UK TV

Who’s your favourite Doctor?

The 10 DoctorsTrickier question than it sounds, “Who’s your favourite Doctor?”, even though it’s the most traditional of Doctor Who memes.

I was pondering this the other day, because I realised there wasn’t one Doctor that I ranked above all the others. There’s something dissatisfying about each of them, I realised.

You see the question isn’t really “Which Doctor is your favourite?”, it’s really “Which Doctor and era of the show is your favourite?” Yes, David Tennant is very good and could well be the best Doctor of them all, but he kind of irritated me during the second series of new Who. And there was Daleks in Manhattan to cast a great big shadow over him, too. So I couldn’t, in all conscious, vote for him as my favourite Doctor because of the dead weight of those stories draining off my enthusiasm for him.

So I slowly progressed through each of the Doctors in turn, weighing them up.

  • William Hartnell: The best Doctor for one episode only – the first one, An Unearthly Child, when he’s an evil git. After that, doo-lally tap, flying saucers on a pieces of string and stories that lasted longer than a tax audit and felt as bad to sit through.
  • Patrick Troughton: Good stories and at least one fun companion, but there’s just something about his Doctor that leaves little impression, although I do like his slyness in Invasion.
  • Jon Pertwee: Brilliant for his first season, where he’s imperious, alien and self-serving (“Screw you guys. As soon as I get this TARDIS fixed, I’m sodding off. You can fight the aliens yourself then”) and has the wonderful Liz Shaw as a companion. Then he turns into a wine-tasting git who goes to establishment clubs and has a companion with the mental capacity of a squirrel.
  • Tom Baker: Again, a wonderful first few seasons of stories and a clever final season (that’s a bit dull, admittedly). But hampered by the rubbish Graham Williams era and Tom Baker slowly going round the bend in the middle.
  • Peter Davison: Great stories, although some really turkeys here and there. Some interesting attempts at characterisations of companions, even the ones who were really irritating, as well as Turlough who was great (for a story). But the Doctor himself didn’t really have a personality except in Castrovalva (his first story) and The Caves of Androzani (his last story).
  • Colin Baker: If you were going by his audio adventures only, one of the best Doctors. Possibly even the best. And the idea of a slightly mental, psychotic Doctor was quite fun. Plus he had Peri as a companion. Ah, Peri… But the eighth circle of Hell is probably filled with giant plasma screens playing his TV stories on a continual loop.
  • Sylvester McCoy: Take any other Doctor, give him the same stories (yes, even Time and the Rani and The Happiness Patrol) and he’d make them into instant classics. But with Sylvester McCoy, even the best of the stories have an element that I will describe as “extreme suckiness”
  • Paul McGann: Not a lot to go on really, is there? Could have been good. Definitely could have been better than in the TV movie, and when he’s good in the audio stories, he’s very, very good. But still not worthy of best Doctor honours.
  • Christopher Ecclescake: Oozed loathing for the show from every pore of his body. Are you mental?
  • David Tennant: Could have been the best. But isn’t. See above.

I eventually came to the conclusion that my favourite Doctor was Jon Pertwee, but only during his first season (season seven), although I could potentially swap him out for Tom Baker in Ark in Space.

So over to you guys, assuming you have the time and the inclination. What’s your favourite era of Doctor Who? It can be as long as you like (eg the 80s, any year with a 3 in it); it can be as short as you like (eg the pre-title sequence of Remembrance of the Daleks, the end of Utopia); it can be new Who or old Who; it can be based on any criteria (eg David Tennant iz sooo HOTT in eVERYTHING!!!!!, the hermeneutic coding in Kinda is the best seen in any performed text).

Answers on a postcard to the usual address or in the comments below.

Audio and radio play reviews

Review: The Companion Chronicles 4×7 – The Suffering

The-Suffering-cover.jpgFeminism and Doctor Who haven’t exactly been easy bedfellows. Most female companions are notable for their lack of character development, their tendency to scream and get captured rather than do anything useful, or having been hired mainly as eye candy. Even when the show has tried to embrace feminism through the companions, it’s not really worked – cf Liz Shaw (fired for being too independent and self-confident) and Sarah Jane Smith (marked tendency to scream, get captured and just hector people a lot about women’s lib rather than actually do anything).

So it was with an air of trepidation (and the idea that the play’s title would be only too accurate) that I began to listen to The Suffering, a Companion Chronicle featuring both Steven (Peter Purves) and Vicki (Maureen O’Brien) that’s set during the time of the Sufragette movement. My fears were calmed slightly by the fact that:

  1. It’s written by a woman, Jacqueline Rayner, who can do reasonably good Companion Chronicles.
  2. It’s a Hartnell Companion Chronicle and they’re usually better than the others

I’m not going to say it’s great and it does tread a very fine line between bludgeon-level subtlety and something a little deeper, but it’s okay. But did it really need to be two CDs-long?

No. It really, really didn’t.

Continue reading “Review: The Companion Chronicles 4×7 – The Suffering”

TV reviews

Review: Doctor Who – 3×4 – Daleks in Manhattan

Daleks In Manhattan

There’s something about Helen Raynor’s writing. It’s always nicely put together, doesn’t insult your intelligence too much and has a certain sensibility about it that makes you think she’s trying to write proper drama. But it’s absolutely dull to watch. Witness the third episode of Torchwood for a similar phenomenon.

So it was with Daleks in Manhattan. With a tiny group of Daleks trying to destroy life as we know it with an insidious plan, it evoked memories of classic Who stories, such as Power of the Daleks. It certainly tried to notch up similar amounts of tension and there was the old-school move of making sure all sets, including sewers, had ultra-smooth floors for the Daleks to glide over.

But coupled with a rather spoilerish edition of the Radio Times that removed all traces of surprise from the story, all it managed to do was get yawns out of me. Yawn, yawn, yawn: that was me doing an impression of myself watching the episode.

Continue reading “Review: Doctor Who – 3×4 – Daleks in Manhattan”

News

News to end the week by

Doc girls

I’m off again today. Stu_N knows where. Stu_N knows why.

Doctor Who

  • A cracking bit of art, illustrating the various female companions down the ages. Isn’t Liz Shaw cute, although the David Tennant is pretty cute, too. [via Behind the Sofa]
  • Talking of cartoons, an 13-part animated version of the show is to appear as part of Totally Doctor Who, according to the Mirror (scroll down). Anthony Head will guest-voice.
  • Confirmation of what Paul Cornell’s story will be about in series three.
  • PJ Hammond talks about Sapphire and Steel and Torchwood. He touches in passing on the fact he’s writing an episode for series two and that the ITV revival of Sapphire and Steel has fallen through.

Film

Music

British TV

US TV