TV reviews

In the US: Sundays, 10/9c, NBC

Three episodes into Crisis and we’ve been through highs and lows. This isn’t because of all the poor like rich kids who have been abducted in order to force their VIP parents to do various things at the behest of the bad guys; it’s because the show has been quite variable.

What saved the first episode from being simply CBS’s Hostages but with more kids and less budget was a degree of intelligence and a slight political edge. As well as showing – within dramatic limits – that the producers had actually thought about how it would be possible for people to kidnap a whole bunch of important kids then evade detection in this surveillance age, Crisis to some extent has had us side with the baddies in wanting to watch the entitled suffer.

To a certain extent this was necessary, since the heroes themselves (Rachael Taylor and Lance Gross) weren’t exactly that interesting. The two episodes since have wisely chosen to focus on the various guest parents of the week (Gillian Anderson, Faran Tahir, Melinda McGraw*) as they’ve been forced to do things by the kidnappers. Indeed, the show has in some ways become 24, but as if Jack Bauer were really dull and only capable of running around a lot and waving his gun and each episode involved him hunting down car salesmen and civil servants.

What kept the show’s head above the water for all this was a degree of intelligence. When it forgot to be intelligent and instead went for downright stupid – the second episode, which saw (spoiler alert) a CIA safe house inside the Pakistani embassy – it became a regular, vanilla, unwatchable NBC action show. Fortunately, episode three restored not only the Occupy Wall Street mentality of the first episode as well as that intelligence, although obviously not to such an extent that you’d truly believe any of this could really happen: highlight of episode three was our black hero being stopped by a black security guard after a black female baddie called to say she’d seen a black man with a gun and she was frightened. It was a sly but complicated musing on racism in the middle of some action that you probably wouldn’t get on CBS.

There are still obviously problems with the plot, the dullness of the heroes and the sheer logistics of it all – if the chief baddie was inspired to take the rich people down because of all their wealth and the fact he couldn’t pay his mortgage, where did he get the cash for this not exactly cheap scheme? And why aren’t his comrades more clued into his motivations? But there’s enough of a spark in each episode that while it’s not exactly perfect, there’s usually something surprising or new that it’ll probably be worth watching the rest of the series.

Barrometer rating: 3
Rob’s prediction: Will last a season but probably not more than that

* I’m enough of an X-Files nerd that I’m chuffed that the First Lady of Crisis is Melinda McGraw, who played Scully’s sister on The X-Files, so I’m hoping for a scene or two featuring both McGraw and Anderson

In the US: Sundays, 9/8c, ABC

Ah, what a shame. After such a promising start, Resurrection has failed to live up to expectations.

Alternately moving and mystifying, the first episode gave us a small-town American child waking up in China, only for immigrations official Omar Epps to discover once he gets the child back to his home that he died 30 years earlier.

Qu’est-ce qui se passe? Well, this isn’t Les Revenants, so stop asking questions in French, but three episodes in, we’re still not sure.

In fact, we’re pretty much in exactly the same place we were in by the end of the first episode, with the producers essentially extending the mystery by bringing back a new dead person at the end of every episode. The only explanation for events that we have so far – it’s all linked to the town’s river somehow – has proved to be a clunker already.

To a certain extent, this isn’t really a show about plot, though. This is a show about loss, what it would mean emotionally to people to have a loved one restored and how everyone would react if they did. So far each returning dead person has been intended at showing a different facet of these experiences.

But ultimately it’s been empty, since it’s not really explored the issues in much depth and often times, despite its unique set-up, it simply states the blindingly obvious or something that didn’t need the supernatural to be explored. So, for example, the local churchgoers are suspicious that it’s the work of the Devil, but no one ponders on what it means for Jesus if he’s not uniquely resurrected – or if he’s now bringing people back. Older parents do find it harder to raise energetic young children: this is as true for normal kids as it is for formerly dead ones. And so on.

So we have something that falls between two stools: it’s not proper science-fiction or fantasy, since it’s singularly failing to explore both the mechanisms and implications of resurrection; it’s not proper drama since it lacks true depth and what emotion there was largely got left behind in the first episode. And it clearly should have been half its length, judging by how far the plot has been strung out already.

Everyone’s doing their level best, but this is an idea apparently best left to the French.

Rob’s rating: 3
Rob’s prediction: Will last for a season but no more