Into The Badlands
US TV

Review: Into The Badlands 1×1 (US: AMC; UK: Amazon Instant Video)


In the US: Sundays, 10/9c, AMC
In the UK: Tuesdays, Amazon Instant Video

There is a famous paradox. Although Knight Rider claimed it was Zeno’s Paradox, it’s not. But it is at least a paradox. Here it is:

What happens when an unstoppable force hits an immovable object?

What’s the answer? Into the Badlands. How so? Because it’s an actual, real-world test of that paradox. It takes the unstoppable force that is the Hong Kong martial arts movie and confronts it with the immobable object of an AMC TV series.

Despite the likes of Indonesia’s The Raid coming along to challenge them, Hong Kong martial arts movies are, of course, the fastest genre in the world. If you have any interest in martial movies, you watch Hong Kong martial arts to see the best – and fastest – martial artists the silver screen has to offer. I’m most partial to classic Jet Li myself, but Donnie Yen, Sammo Hung, Jackie Chan et al have all formed part of my viewing habits since Jonathan Ross’s Son of The Incredibly Strange Film Show revealed their delights to me back in the 80s.

And the slowest genre in the world? AMC TV series. The network practically fetishises slowness:


Even its fastest shows – Breaking Bad, The Walking Dead, Better Call Saul – have a glacial chill to them, and that’s before we consider the almost geological time scales over which the likes of Mad Men, Hell on Wheels and Halt and Catch Fire operate.

And Into The Badlands is a deliberate attempt to bring these two genres together. Rather bizarrely the brainchild of Smallville creators Alfred Gough and Miles Millar, it stars Daniel Wu, an American actor but the star of dozens of Hong Kong martial arts movies.

The show is set in a post-apocalyptic America. This isn’t that surprising: martial arts date from before guns and are made largely redundant by the presence of guns, so a martial arts movie usually needs to have a reason for there to not be any guns – something somewhat problematic in modern-day and even historic America, but not so hard in a post-apocalyptic, post-technological society. Unles you turn the guns into a virtue, of course.

As with most other post-apocalyptic societies, everything’s become weirdly patriarchal and feudal in Into The Badlands, with seven ‘barons’ now running America, following a series of wars. Each has made their territory safe and stopped the wars by getting rid of guns. In return, everyone either learns how to be a ‘Clipper’ – martial arts soldier cops – assuming they’re male or goes to work in the fields picking poppies or getting married to the Baron.

Wu plays one such Clipper, who patrols the territories, enforcing the justice of his increasingly unstable, increasingly bewived Baron (Marton Csokas from Falcón, Rogue, The Equalizer, The Bourne Supremacy). One day, he comes across a peaceful boy sought after by another Baron, ‘The Widow’, only to discover that he gets superhero killing powers at odd moments. 

What will he do? WIll he take the boy into the lawless ‘Badlands’ between Barons’ terrorities, looking for the boy’s mother and answers to his own past? And will he do it before the Sun expands into a Red Giant and dies (aka the next AMC Upfronts)?

Continue reading “Review: Into The Badlands 1×1 (US: AMC; UK: Amazon Instant Video)”

News: Zoolander 2 trailer, Bastard Executioner cancelled, Cat’s Cradle adaptation, Red Button to go? + more

Film casting

Film trailers

Australian TV

Canadian TV

  • CBC developing: adaptation of period mother-daughter dramedy Tempting Faith DiNapoli

UK TV

  • BBC to cut £150m, possibly including Red Button

US TV

US TV show casting

New US TV shows

News: Val Kilmer returns to Top Gun, Famous Five movie, Office US and UK stars unite, Hawaiian Dick + more

Film

Film casting

Film trailers

  • Trailer for Alex Proyas’ Gods of Egypt
  • Trailer for 400 Days with Caity Lotz and Brandon Routh

Canadian TV

New UK TV shows

US TV

US TV show casting

New US TV shows

New US TV show casting

  • Cary Elwes and Mary Birdsong to recur on HBO’s Max
The BarrometerA Barrometer rating of 2

Third-episode verdict: Ash Vs Evil Dead (US: Starz)

In the US: Saturdays, 9pm EST, Starz
In the UK: Not yet acquired

Whatever else can be said about Starz’s Ash Vs Evil Dead, there’ll always be the fact that every week, it gives us Bruce Campbell, doing what he does best – fighting the Evil Dead. But the show has more than that. It has comedy. It has horror.

The precise ratio of comedy to horror varies with every episode. Most of the time, Ash Vs Evil Dead is quite funny but filled with a lot of gore, typically involving Bruce Campbell using his chainsaw-for-a-hand to chop off a head, disembowel something, etc. Watching Campbell do this, as his idiotic Ash character does something even more idiotic each week, is a joy to behold.

What it wasn’t until this week, though, was scary. Gory, yes. Scary no. But all credit to the show, as episode three gave us a demon rather than a zombie/Deadite, and was actually very creepy. It was less funny, but as I said, the ratio tends to vary.

What the show hasn’t yet worked out is how to make us give a toss about Campbell’s young helpers. Or the FBI agent chasing after them. And while it does have the obvious asset of Lucy Lawless in the cast, she only gets to show up for about a minute each episode – something that results from the fact each episode is only half an hour long, so there’s not much room for development or anything that properly services the main plot.

So Ash Vs Evil Dead‘s biggest asset is also its biggest problem: Bruce Campbell. It’s his show and there’s not much else that’s interesting about it. It’s fine as comedy-horror goes, and far more enjoyable compared to any other horror show on TV right now, but that comedy-horror only really works when Bruce is around.

I’ll certainly carry on watching it, because Bruce is Gold. But I can’t help but feel the show is coasting a little, getting by on Bruce when it could be doing a lot more. Maybe we’ll get that in time, once Lucy Lawless shows up in earnest to show the kids how it’s done. Then it might be dead good. See what I did there?

Barrometer rating: 2
TMINE’s prediction: Not as great as it could and should have been, but still top comedy-horror, and Starz has already renewed it for a second season.

The BarrometerA Barrometer rating of 4

Third-episode verdict: Agent X (US: TNT)

In the US: Sundays, 9/8c, TNT

I’m starting to wonder this season if there’s any point in anyone reviewing just the first episodes of new TV shows. It was always a slightly questionable area, given how series can get better or worse over time. That’s why the blog gave birth to first the Carusometer and then the Barrometer to measure TV quality over time. But now shows are simply deciding to become different shows from the second episodes. Review just the first episode? You’re almost reviewing a different show now.

Agent X is a case in point. It’s not a show that’s actually got much better over its first three episodes, but it has become different. The first episode – first two in fact – was clearly an attempt to do an American James Bond, albeit with more than a hint of National Treasure, with Sharon Stone becoming vice president of the United States, only to discover there’s a secret article of the Constitution that gives her responsibility over a secret agent, who covertly sorts out US enemies, foreign and domestic. Unfortunately, said ‘Agent X’ is played by the most average US TV actor imaginable, Jeff Hephner, and the infinitely more interesting Stone gets to do little but turn up to parties and make phone calls. Meanwhile, her helper monkey Gerald McRaney tries to do Simon & Simon again, but without another Simon to help him, making it a lot less funny than it was in the 80s.

James Bond was an odd choice for inspiration, particularly given the show was created and is exec produced by William Blake Herron, who co-wrote The Bourne Identity. Indeed, both Herron and TNT seem to have thought so, too, because episode three switched from Bond to Bourne, right down to the music and the occasional shakey-cam. It also decided to add a whole new sub-plot about a secret conspiracy against the government from within, one involving Stone’s deceased husband. 

The change is probably a good idea. Unfortunately, Herron and co are the wrong people to implement it. While Hephner is better suited to the ‘average Joe’ concept of a Bourne – who in the books, at least, had surgery to make him look more average – he’s still an utterly uninspiring and implausible action lead, up there with Chris Vance’s TV Transporter in the scheme of things, but not even that charismatic or handy in a fight scene. Not that the stunt scenes are any good, being bereft of good direction or innovation. They try to be clever, but ‘man hiding behind a series of doors and then opening them’ isn’t as clever or interesting as the show thinks it is.

Stone’s still relegated to doing nothing much; McRaney just gets to growl and mentor Hephner into being duller; and it’s all still deep bobbins of the highest order. I might hang around for another episode or two to watch Stone and see if the conspiracy arc goes anywhere interesting. But to be honest, it’s going to be a bit of a chore.

Barrometer rating: 4
TMINE prediction: Cancelled by the end of the season or subjected to a major Legends-style reboot for season two