US TV

Preview: Covert Affairs 1×1

Covert Affairs

In the US: Tuesdays, 10/9c, USA Network. Starts 13th July

Piper Perabo should have had a great career in the movies. Okay, Coyote Ugly wasn’t exactly a great starting point, but she’s a good actress, she did well in The Prestige – exciting things should have happened but didn’t. Maybe it’s because most people confuse her with Jennifer Garner.

So it’s good to see her getting her own TV show, Covert Affairs, even if it does appear the producers were trying to remake Alias and got her confused with Jennifer Garner as well.

In Covert Affairs, Perabo plays a new recruit to the CIA whose language skills and aptitude for the job get her rushed into the field by her occasionally helpful bosses Arthur Campbell (The OC‘s Peter Gallagher) and his distrustful wife Joan (Kari Matchett from Leverage and 24). While out and about, she gets to have fights and car chases, while putting on array of accents to fool the police, FBI and even, sometimes, the enemy. No wigs mind. That would have been too obvious.

But since this is about a “single woman [with a] double life” (as the show’s posters and ads say) and the show is called Covert Affairs (emphasis on the second word), we also have possible romantic interest for her in the form of the helpful Auggie Anderson (Jake 2.0/Ugly Betty‘s Christopher Gorham), the smooth Jai Wilcox (Sendhil Ramamurthy from Heroes, but only from episode two) and whomever her unknowing sister (Anne Dudek from House and Mad Men) sends in her direction. If only she weren’t pining for that guy she met on vacation all those years ago…

While it’s not quite up there with Burn Notice, Covert Affairs just about manages to blend humour, romance and spy action to create something that while not unmissable, should make any pangs you have for the return of Alias disappear.

Continue reading “Preview: Covert Affairs 1×1”

Question of the week: what’s the point of Doctor Who’s companion?

Stuart and I are having a little discussion over on his blog. We basically disagree on the nature of the companion’s role, particularly in the case of a female companion, on Doctor Who.

I argued that “It’s sexist to assume that the companion should not be shown to have other skills that may be as valuable as the Doctor’s and in some areas superior – or if she doesn’t, to fail to address her feelings on the subject.”

Stuart argues that “the companion is wholly subsidiary to the Doctor and need only exist to be a mouthpiece for the audience. I personally have no interest at all in the companion much beyond that.”

What do you think? Let’s throw it open to y’all with a question of the week:

What is the point of Doctor Who‘s companion? Should time be spent developing the role and showing his or her strengths? Or is that just a waste of time when all we really want is a cracking adventure and the Doctor saving the day? If so, is that sexist or simply the nature of a format in which there’s a 900-year-old male genius at the centre of it all? And are you even interested in the companions as characters?

As always, leave a comment with your answer, a link to your answer on your own blog or even leave it on Stuart’s blog for a change

Thursday’s “Debbie Gibson fights Tiffany” news

Film

Radio

British TV

US TV

US TV

Review: Scoundrels 1×1

Scoundrels

In the US: Sundays, 9/8c, ABC

It’s official. The UK’s drama output has sunk to an all-time low. You know how I know? Because not only has US TV stopped plundering us for formats, it’s now started plundering New Zealand TV for idea.

Outrageous Fortune is one of NZ’s most popular shows, a slightly Shameless affair about a criminal family trying to go straight. Now ABC in the US has decided to remake it as Scoundrels – since clearly the cancellation of The Riches wasn’t warning enough.

It’s put some fair old talent into it, too: Virginia Madsen (Dune, Sideways et al), David James Elliot (JAG), Leven Rambin (The Sarah Connor Chronicles), Carlos Bernard (24), Patrick John Flueger (Brothers) and Jessica Collins (Tru Calling). So why does it fall so flat? Oh yes, because it’s mainstream summer TV and edgy is just not what we’re looking for.

Here’s a trailer for Scoundrels followed by a trailer for Outrageous Fortune: see if you can spot the difference.

Continue reading “Review: Scoundrels 1×1”