Tuesday’s skinny companion? news

Doctor Who

Film

Theatre

British TV

US TV

Classic TV

Lost Gems: Ultraviolet

Let’s face it, vampires are silly. Yes, they are. They so are. Unless you’re stuck in some perpetual Twilight of gothdom/Emodom, the whole “vampiredom is cool/mysterious/sexy/dark/a great way to live” should have been replaced in your psyche by vampiredom is “sad/ridiculous/obvious metaphor for oral sex and venereal diseases” years ago.

To be fair, in part, that’s because of the daftness of general TV depictions of vampires, which should have put you off them altogether. The vampires on Buffy very quickly became laughable and Angel very rapidly became self-parody. The Marc Warren Dracula adaptation was awful, and no matter how good the 1970s BBC adaptation with Louis Jourdan was, his flapping his way up a wall like an overladen man on a spacehopper was enough to cause hysterics – and not the frightened kind – in any viewer.

But it needn’t be so. As Being Human in the UK and to a lesser extent True Blood in the US recently showed, you can do vampires convincingly in this day and age if you do them right.

Ten years ago, Channel 4 did the first – and possibly the best – of the modern vampire stories. Starring Jack Davenport, Susannah Harker and Idris Elba of The Wire, Ultraviolet managed to bring science, intelligence, moral ambiguity, decent characters and all the hallmarks of modern storytelling to the vampire story – all without saying the word ‘vampire’ once.

Although it’s been repeated and issued on DVD, it’s hard to get now (although you can watch every episode on YouTube) as it’s been deleted, so it’s officially a Lost Gem. Here’s a shiny fan-produced trailer for you, albeit one with a very bad choice in soundtrack:

Continue reading “Lost Gems: Ultraviolet”

General thoughts about and weirdnesses of last week’s television

As mentioned in my asides, I didn’t have much time for blogging last week. Sorry about that. But here’s a round-up of a few of my TV thoughts:

Survivors
Pretty rubbish. Couldn’t even be bothered to watch episode two. Interestingly, probably the only instance of a TV show adapted from the novelisation of an older TV show, and there was the name-switch of a couple of characters to fake out the seven people who could remember the original series/novel and who lived/died.

But still very tedious, with no really interesting characters and no real sense of disaster or tragedy. “Oh my God, I’ve had to burn the body of my dead husband. Right, anyone for chips?”

To a certain extent, the problem is with the format, since although it’s got a great starting point – almost everyone in the world dies so how will the survivors manage to eke out an existence? – invariably it descends into decisions about crop rotation, government structures and population stabilisation systems that somehow manage to avoid discussing or depicting sex since it’s mainstream BBC.

But the original series still managed to make the characters interesting so clearly not everything can be blamed on Terry Nation.

Knight Rider
We’ve stopped watching it. It really is very, very bad.

Odd BBC2 links
We were watching Top Gear yesterday when up pops a trailer for Louis Theroux’s programme following the police in Philadelphia. Two things:

  1. Theroux needs a different act if he’s going to do serious journalism. To policeman: “What would have happened if he’d drawn that gun?” “He’d have been shot.” “Who by?” Erm… Are you mental?
  2. The BBC2 announcer then said “It’s just like an episode of The Wire“. So now we’re trailing BBC2 programmes with references to a show that’s only on FX and gets about 36,000 viewers. That’s a bit niche, isn’t it?

24: Redemption
God. Hasn’t television moved on since the last series of
24. That felt ridiculously antediluvian. Can 24 only thrive when there’s a Republican presidency – discuss?

Heroes
Getting bored now, mainly because Ali Larter isn’t in it enough, but also because of all the ridiculous personality switches, the fact there are so few characters who act like grown-ups, general inconsistencies, lack of logic, etc. Sigh. Roll on volume four (hopefully) although some of the spoilers I’ve heard don’t fill me with much enthusiasm. How would you fix the show?

Dexter
Told you you have to wait for a while to see if it gets good. Always around the seven or eighth episode.

The Unit
Why aren’t more people watching it? It’s brilliant.

The IT Crowd
Thank God it’s back. Officially the only comedy show in which Matt Berry and Richard Ayoade have ever appeared in that’s funny. Katherine Parkinson’s great – and a redhead again. Yey! And that magician was great. If only bluffball.co.uk were a real site…

Thanksgiving
Is all good television banned on Thanksgiving in the US?

UK TV

Who should replace David Tennant?

Paterson Joseph

So David Tennant’s heading off for pastures new. Come 2010, we’re going to need a new Doctor in the TARDIS.

Current favourite for the job is Paterson Joseph, best known from Peep Show, at 3-1 odds, but David Morrisey is close behind at 5-1 (and there might be a revelation or two in the Christmas special to look forward to there), James Nesbitt is at 6-1 and John Simm (weirdly enough) is at 8-1.

Question for the day though: who would you like to be the next Doctor. It might be an outlandish suggestion that would never ever happen in real life, but this is Fantasy Doctor League so name your personal fave right now.

I’m currently being persuaded that Idris Elba (of The Wire and Ultraviolet) would be a great choice, although maybe one that wouldn’t actually come about in real life. What do you think?