US TV

Review: Numb3rs 3.1

Numb3rs

In the US: Fridays, 10pm ET/PT, CBS

In the UK: First season currently being repeated on ITV3. No word on third season.

Characters re-cast: 0

Major characters gotten rid of: 0-2 (we’ll see in part two)

Major new characters: 0, but Dylan Bruno is now in the main cast list

Format change percentage: 0-25%, depending on part two

Pointless maths techniques performed: Many

There was something refreshing about Numb3rs when it first appeared. It was smart, for one thing: a maths professor helps his FBI agent brother to solve crimes, without either brother ending up looking stupid. But after the first few episodes, the shine started to go. It stopped being the CSI of mathematical criminal investigation shows (a small band, admittedly. Anyone name any others?) and become the CSI: New York instead. I’ve kept watching, more out of habit than because the show is drawing me in, although the occasional script does show a glimmer of the quality the show once had.

And now, it’s back. After its summer break, has it managed to recapture its former glory? I’d say, no, with an accuracy of 25-35%.

Continue reading “Review: Numb3rs 3.1”

US TV

Third episode verdict: Men in Trees

Men in Trees againWhat a difference a good writer makes. Conversely, what a difference a bad writer makes. I actually really liked the first two episodes of Men in Trees. They were fun bits of rom-com plotting from one of the head writers of Sex and the City.

The third episode zoomed by on Friday and I think I’d rather brave a pack of ravenous jackals than sit through it again. On aggregate anyway: the second half was slightly better – I might be willing to brave a slightly malnourished jackal instead of watching that.

But my God, that was appalling. If I were to suggest an image of its quality, I’d offer one of Elmo’s racoons trawling through a skip and chucking out an old Northern Exposure script covered in unmentionable forms of slime. Dull, stupid and utterly unengrossing: ooh, a fund-raising event that auctions off men – never seen that before.

And correct me if I’m wrong, but aren’t there supposed to be ten men for every woman in Elmo: do they really need an auction as a way to meet men*? Isn’t it the whole point of the show that Elmo is a town where women have the upper hand, simply because there are so few of them, and they can therefore get almost anything they want, thanks to the laws of supply and demand? Marin Frist is supposed to be finding herself, not bidding for the chance to have a date with a guy. Dear oh dear.

So I’m not sure what to recommend to you, the reading and viewing public. Judging by word of mouth, Men in Trees isn’t likely to last very long, and if this is what the scripts that aren’t by Jenny Bicks are going to be like, I’ll grab my shotgun and help put it out of its misery myself. But if this is just a blip – and a very ill-timed one for my third-episode verdict – maybe it will be worth struggling on with.

I’ll watch next week’s just to be sure, but I’m now going for a thumbs down on this one.

* Footnote: There is a saying, apparently, about the chances of meeting a man in Alaska – “The odds are good, but the goods are odd”. The goods aren’t that odd in Elmo though, so I don’t think that should alter things too much.

US TV

Review: CSI 7.1

CSI Cirque du Soleil

In the US: Thursdays, 9pm ET/PT, CBS

In the UK: In the usual places from January.

Characters re-cast: 0

Major characters gotten rid of: 0

Major new characters: 0, but Louise Lombard is in the credits now

Format change percentage: 0%, unless you count Sara and Grissom acknowledging their love

Beards lost: 1

Is it really over six years since CSI started? It doesn’t seem possible, does it? Yet here we are on season seven. Doesn’t time fly?

The original CSI has always been the greatest of the three franchises. It’s smarter, has better characters, better characterisations, better plots, better dialogue. Better everything really. And at least the forensic science is somewhere close to being true and it’s not seen as some kind of magic that can prove all things.

Enough. Rant over. The best is back, but can the champ still knock out the opposition?

Oh yes. It’s the end of round one and the others are on the floor in a stupor.

Continue reading “Review: CSI 7.1”

US TV

Review: Six Degrees

Six Degrees

In the US: Thursdays, 10/9c, ABC

In the UK: ITV1 from early in 2007, with repeats on ITV2.

You all watch Lost, right? So what do you love about it? The mystery? The weirdness? The romance?

Oh. You love the flashbacks, where it turns out that everyone really knew everyone else before they got on the island? And you’d really love a show that’s exactly like Lost‘s flashbacks?

Well, here you go. Have Six Degrees. And guess what: it’s by the creator of Lost, JJ Abrams.

Continue reading “Review: Six Degrees”

Third episode verdict: Happy Hour

Not much’s changed since the first episode of this one, which didn’t overly impress me. It didn’t help that Fox showed episode two and episode three out of order, resulting in some very odd behaviours for the characters.

I do kind of like it. As mentioned, there’s an inner sadness to most of the characters that does make you feel sorry for them and if you forget the laughter track, it’s actually an interesting drama with occasional comedic moments. But as a sitcom, it’s really not very good.

Avoid if you’re looking for laughs; watch if you want to see the tears of supposed clowns.