Two articles in the space of a week – one on Time Out, one on The Guardian‘s web site – argue that TV is better than film, not just artistically but also because you don’t need to endure other people at the cinema.
What do you think? Do you prefer TV or would you rather watch a good movie? And are The Guardian and Time Out merely rebelling against modern cinema and are swayed by the lower quality of much of modern television? Would the argument have been any different if it had been held in the 70s or 80s?