US TV

Mini-reviews: Sean Saves The World 1×1 (NBC)

Sean Saves The World

In the US: Thursdays, 9/8c, NBC

Well, ITV has already shown us what you get when you take a traditional British sitcom format and fill it with much loved gay actors playing (horribly) stereotypical gay characters: you get the terrible Vicious. Now NBC shows us when happens when you take a traditional US sitcom format and fill with a much love gay actor playing a (slightly) stereotypical gay character: you get something a lot better.

Sean Saves The World is a multi-camera comedy, filmed in front of a studio audience and directed by James Burrows of Cheers fame, who’s been directing sitcoms since the 1980s. It sees Sean Hayes from Will and Grace playing a single dad trying to bring up his teenage daughter with the help and hindrance of his mother (Linda Lavin). At the same time, he also has to deal with his employees at work (including Vik Sahay from Chuck) as well as his company’s new owner (Thomas Lennon from Reno 911).

So far, so absolutely conventional. A lot of the dialogue is very conventional and there’s heart-warming family bonding at the end. Beyond the fact it has a gay central character, this could have been shot in practically any decade since the 1960s.

The show has two big points things going for it though. The first is Hayes, who manages to lift even the most ordinary dialogue into something much better. The result is quite a few laughs, which in this year’s season of supposed comedies, is a standout trait.

The second is Thomas Lennon. Not only does he have the same comedic talent as Hayes, his evil boss character is something different: he constantly imagines himself to be in a battle of wits with Hayes, trying to score points and lay traps at every point, even claiming prizes when he wins. Pretty much every scene with him in it is better than any other scene without him.

And, just to repeat, it’s actually quite funny. Okay, the female characters aren’t especially, with teenage daughter (Samantha Isler) really there as a problem to be solved and Sean’s mother no different from any other hectoring, not especially maternal sitcom mom, ready to toss out zingers at her progeny’s expense. There’s also a co-worker (Megan Hilty, who replaced Lindsay Sloane directed after the show went to series) who’s a colossal over-actor, too.

But, again, this does need repeating again, it’s actually quite funny. Will marvels never cease?

Thursday’s “David Tennant to star in Broadchurch (US), more Wilfred and SHIELD down” news

Film

Film casting

Trailers

  • Trailer for Last Vegas, with Michael Douglas, Robert De Niro, Morgan Freeman, et al

Theatre

UK TV

US TV

US TV casting

New US TV shows

New US TV show casting

News

Wednesday’s “Camp cancelled, more Cedar Cove, ABC’s musical fairy tale and more Narnia” news

Hannibal - season two

Film

Film casting

Trailers

  • Trailer for Delicious, with Louise Brealey and Nico Rogner
  • New trailer for The Hobbit: THe Desolation of Smaug

UK TV

  • Trailer for ITV’s Breathless, with Jack Davenport, Iain Glen, Joanna Page et al

US TV shows

US TV show casting

New US TV shows

The BarrometerA Barrometer rating of 3

Third-episode verdict: Sleepy Hollow (Fox/Universal)

In the US: Mondays, 9/8c, Fox
In the UK: Wednesdays, 9pm, Universal. Starts October 9th

As you might expect for a show that relies so much on throwing the crazy out there, Sleepy Hollow is a somewhat hit or miss show, aiming for multiple targets in the hope that something will land. One moment it’s giving us an updating of the Ichabod Crane story, complete with Headless Horseman armed with a sub-machine gun; the next it’s all Omen-ish, giving us the Book of Revelations and Witnesses to the end of the world; the next we’re in Dan Brown conspiracy theory territory, with sects of witches running the US throughout the ages; the next we’re in Kolchak, Grimm, X-Files and Torchwood territory, with Ichabod, clad constantly in the same outfit he’s been wearing while buried in peat for the past 200 years, and his female partner investigate demons of the week against a heavy mythologised background.

The third episode did suggest that it might be finding more of an American Horror Story niche, exploiting old horror stories and American myths. It’s not a bad tack, given that to a certain extent the show is already based in American myth – the American revolution myth – the third episode giving us the interesting ‘fact’ that the Mohawks fought on the side of the colonists in the war, when actually they sided with the Crown and ended up getting shipped off to Canada by Washington after the war as a result. It would certainly be better than American Horror Story.

But beyond the occasional bit of frightening imagery, some good CGI, the central performance of Tom Mison, there’s not much to recommend the show. Supernatural has done all of this better, albeit crasser and less slickly. The really fun stuff seemed to have got burnt off in the first episode. The show drips with too much mythology already and we’re only three episodes in. It’s not a great show, even if it’s prone to having good moments.

Try it, see if you like it, but don’t expect too much of it.

Barrometer rating: 3
Rob’s prediction: It’ll probably losers viewers over the first season and renewal will be touch or go. Might make it, might not, if it doesn’t do something to lift it out of the supernatural ordinary.