US TV

Review: Conviction 1×1 (US: ABC; UK: Sky Living)


In the US: Mondays, 10/9c, ABC
In the UK: Acquired by Sky Living. Will air in November

This is not a paying job. I try to keep the ads to a minimum. I ignore the now daily requests for ‘native advertising’ (“I am interested in publishing an article on your website which will be relevant to the theme of your website and am happy to suggest some topics to you”) – they are not for me. I want this place to stay classy.

That does mean everything on TMINE has to fit round the stuff I actually do get paid for, though, so I don’t always have the time to do everything I’d like to do. Like proof-read. You probably noticed that.

Anyway, right now, all things being equal, I’d be getting out my copy of Adobe Illustrator CC to design a cracking mock up of an Ikea illustration in which a rather large number of bog standard parts are put together to assemble a television that looks exactly the same as any other television. Maybe I’d even make a video of it being assembled in Premiere.

But I don’t have the time to do that. Instead, I’ll have to paint a picture of Conviction with mere words. 

Imagine basically any ensemble procedural show in which you have a crack team of lawyers/doctors/antelope wranglers, all the top of their respective fields, all representing at least one aspect of diversity, but each with one specific issue that none of the others has. They’ll work very hard each week to solve whatever the problem is, because they care so very, very hard and are just so, so brilliant. But they’ll work extra hard if in some way the problem of the week touches on their issue.

However, said show can’t be something like Chicago Fire, Chicago Med, Chicago PD or Chicago Justice. No, it has to be the specific sub-variety of “brilliant but damaged leaders who speak their minds” shows, where the show is really about the leader and everyone else is subversient to him or her, no matter how racist they are. Think Shark. Think House.

In fact, specifically think House because Conviction‘s co-creator is Liz Friedman, last seen being played by the ridiculously marvellous Hudson Leick on the equally ridiculously marvellous Hercules: The Legendary Journeys episode Yes, Virginia, There Is A Hercules. No, really – watch for a couple of minutes and you’ll see what I mean.

Anyone, she was a producer on House so knows how to do these things backwards. 

And now, you’ve got Conviction in which Hayley Atwell (Marvel’s Agent Carter) plays the messed up genius who heads the team of underlings who work hard every episode to prove her right. She’s the daughter of a former president, she used to be a DA with a 95% prosecution rate, then she became a law professor. Then she started taking cocaine and shagging all her students. Oops.

Anyway, DA Eddie Cahill – whose greying temples make me feel so old because I remember him when he was Rachel’s ‘toy boy’ boyfriend on Friends – lets her off, provided she head up his new unsafe convictions unit. Her job is to make sure everyone in prison should be in prison, the theory being that it takes a coke-addict bad girl to spot a coke-addict bad girl. At first, she takes it as sinecure. But soon, she begins to enjoy the job.

And that’s all you really need to know. It is absolutely generic procedural TV. Atwell, who’s forced to deploy an exceedingly wobbly American accent, clearly accepted Conviction as a lifeboat role when Agent Carter was being cancelled. There’s certainly no artistic merit to it, nothing remarkable about it, other than the idea that the only unique thing a female leader could offer is cleavage and an ability to party. I’m not sure that’s a selling point.

Of course, Atwell can’t actually be truly heartless in the same way as Gregory House is, because she’s a woman so wouldn’t be likable. So there have to be signs she cares and she’s touched when mothers demand she care about their innocent/dead sons and daughters. Little tears and everything. 

Legal insights are also minimal and there are attempts to steal from any other crime show that’s passing in the hope that something might be popular – we even have some CSI-ing by lawyers, in which they take a pig carcass out into the woods at night to see if there are any flies on it in the morning. Guess what, idiots: either you scared the flies away or you didn’t wait the several days necessary for the eggs to hatch, none of it’s admissable and you could have just asked a forensic scientist. So why did you spend an entire night in the woods with a pig carcass, you great steaming twats?

Anyway, insert tab A into slot A, take flange B and attach it to nozzle C. Now you’ve built your own Conviction, you don’t need to take this one home.

The BarrometerA Barrometer rating of 3

Third-episode verdict: Designated Survivor (US: ABC; UK: Netflix)

In the US: Wednesdays, 10/9c, ABC
In the UKNetflix. New episode every Thursday

Hindsight is a beautiful thing. It’s also annoying.

Three episodes into Designated Survivor, ABC’s new political thriller in which lowly US cabinet member Kiefer Sutherland gets promoted to president after a terrorist incident kills every member of the US government, and it’s becoming clear that it’s essentially a great big what if: ‘What if a smart, liberal, circumspect Democrat were President following 9/11, rather than George W Bush? Would we still have invaded Afghanistan or Iraq? Would civil liberties still have been trampled? I bet not!’ Married with West Wing and Dave-based optimism, the show effectively then shows us how everything should have been done.

Except it’s not quite as simple as that. While the whole show does have a certain fluffiness to it, despite thousands of people having been killed, it also wants to demonstrate that such naivety won’t get you very far in politics. Try to organise a heroic photo shoot in front of scared plebs and chances are you’ll end up rushed away by your protective detail when the crowds turn ugly. Tell your one main political rival (Virginia Madsen) the truth and chances are it’ll be used against you before she’s even out the room. There’s a dark underbelly of realpolitik to the show, with no good deed of Kiefer’s ever going truly unpunished – only when his intelligence and compassion are married with a certain ruthless and deceptiveness does he manage to achieve what he wants.

Nevertheless, all that fantasising and ‘we know better’ is pretty irritating. The world doesn’t work like that. That’s why everything happened the way it did. The realpolitik only covers the fluffiness, not replace it.

On top of that, Designated Survivor‘s additional problems are small but numerous: Kiefer’s family, including wife Natasha McElhone, are an endless drain on screen time, with the writers not having anything much to say about them other than “It’s difficult being in the spotlight”; the supporting cast, including Kal Penn, are less political animals, more political poodles; there’s minimal excitement in the FBI (principally Maggie Q)’s hunt for the terrorists, who from the end of the first episode were obviously going to be homegrown or working with elements in the US government; a repeated focus on administrative paperwork and how exactly you form a government when everyone’s dead doesn’t make for great TV; and not allowing Sutherland to go full Jack Bauer at every opportunity is clearly insane.

Combined with that omnipresent hindsight, Designated Survivor is less exciting, less dark than it should be, and watching it less than mandatory. I’ll stick with it for a little longer, but unless they let Kiefer hulk out properly soon, this might a classic case of a promising idea that ends up mired in irrelevant detail.

Barrometer rating: 3
Would it be better with a female lead? Yes, if it were anyone except Kiefer 
TMINE’s prediction: Could go either way. Might last more than a season, might not

News: E4 acquires black-ish; Humans and Brooklyn Nine-Nine/New Girl crossover trailers; + more

Internet TV

UK TV

New UK TV show casting

  • Jessie Buckley, Jessica Raine, Ben Miles et al join BBC One’s The Last Post

US TV

US TV show casting

New US TV shows

New US TV show casting

Falling Water
US TV

Preview: Falling Water 1×1 (US: USA)


In the US: Thursdays, 10/9c, USA. Starts October 13

You’d be hard-pushed to think of anyone who watched more than an episode or two of Netflix’s Sense8 and thought to themselves, “Let’s have more of that, please.” Well, maybe a few masochists and sex-starved teenagers, but that’s about it.

And to be fair, Falling Water, USA’s new show about three strangers who (literally) share a dream has been in the works since 2013. But you’d still have thought USA would have put an end to it as soon as Sense8 came out, not just because of the similarities but because Sense8 really is that bad.

Maybe they thought to themselves, “Well, it’s a bit different. Maybe a bit more like Inception or Dreamscape. We can get away with it, surely.”

No. You can’t, USA. Because Falling Water is almost as bad as Sense8. Almost.

Here’s a trailer that’s about five times more exciting than the first episode.

Continue reading “Preview: Falling Water 1×1 (US: USA)”

News: American Horror Story renewed; AMC joins Lodge 49; the Birth of the SAS; + more

Internet TV

Australian TV

European TV

UK TV

New UK TV shows

  • Big Talk developing: adaptation of Gordon Stevens’ The Originals: The Secret History of the Birth of the SAS

US TV

US TV show casting

  • Ray Wise promoted to regular on Fresh Off The Boat

New US TV shows