Third-episode verdict: Into The Badlands (US: AMC; UK: Amazon Instant Video)

The BarrometerA Barrometer rating of 3

In the US: Sundays, 10/9c, AMC
In the UK: Tuesdays, Amazon Instant Video

The famous physicist, Richard Feynman, used to talk about ‘cargo cult science’:

In the South Seas there is a cargo cult of people. During the war they saw airplanes land with lots of good materials, and they want the same thing to happen now. So they’ve arranged to imitate things like runways, to put fires along the sides of the runways, to make a wooden hut for a man to sit in, with two wooden pieces on his head like headphones and bars of bamboo sticking out like antennas—he’s the controller—and they wait for the airplanes to land. They’re doing everything right. The form is perfect. It looks exactly the way it looked before. But it doesn’t work. No airplanes land. So I call these things cargo cult science, because they follow all the apparent precepts and forms of scientific investigation, but they’re missing something essential, because the planes don’t land.

I’d like to propose ‘cargo cult television’ to describe shows like Into The Badlands – they follow all the apparent precepts and forms of television or specific genres of television, but they’re missing something essential. In the specific case of Into The Badlands, it’s trying its level best to be a Hong Kong martial arts movie. It’s got a star of Hong Kong martial arts movies (Daniel Wu). It’s got a script derived from a work of classic Chinese literature (Journey Into The West). It’s even got trademark manoeuvres and stunt scenes lifted almost wholesale from Hong Kong martial arts movies. It’s even got a bit of magic.

But it’s just not a Hong Kong martial arts movie. It’s missing something essential. 

Some things, actually. Enough fights per episode. Speed of execution. Engaging, original scripts. Even the magic’s been used only once in the three episodes we’ve had so far. 

Don’t get me wrong – it’s very beautiful to look at. The fight scenes even achieve a level of beauty themselves. But just like The Matrix before it, every blow lands without weight. Unlike The Matrix, though, there’s nothing to fill the gap beyond a feudal society where everyone goes around punching everyone as a ‘Clipper’ or a ‘Colt’ (Clipper in training), works in a bar or a field, or is a sex slave. And because it’s AMC, we’re already halfway through the first season of six episodes and we haven’t even entered the Badlands*. I’m assuming that’ll be somewhere around season four. 

The show has at least improved a bit since the first episode, having remembered women exist and might not all want to be prostitutes or wives in our dystopian future. There were times when I even became engrossed at points.

But ultimately, this is a poor imitation of a genre that throws out 50 or so movies a year, almost all of them more interesting and more exciting than Into The Badlands. All the same, it’s on Sunday, so what else you going to watch?

Barrometer rating: 3
Rob’s prediction: It’s AMC. Like a dinosaur, it’ll take about two years before it realises it needs to cancel the show

* Confusingly, we may already be in the Badlands and we actually have to leave the Badlands on our future journey




  • benjitek

    For now it's entertaining me quite well, maybe because I'm not a fan of the genre and haven't actually every watched anything martial-arts specific. With luck they'll resolve the story before it is cancelled…

  • “…haven't actually every watched anything martial-arts specific”

    I'm almost envious. It must be like looking at the world with new eyes, where everything's fresh. Shame they had to see Into the Badlands first, really 😉

    “With luck they'll resolve the story before it is cancelled…”
    With luck they might start the story, too…

  • benjitek

    It's started for me — though things in the 3rd episode dragged a little and I started questioning the casting of magic-boy. I think the kid that plays young Batman in Gotham would've been great in the role.

  • It did start telling a story in the first episode, but it seems to have stalled every since, basically retelling that same story again twice. Rival barons? Check. Need to find mummy? Check. Current baron a nutter? Check. Nothing really significant has happened since to change things.

    But Young Master Bruce would have been good in this, as he's probably the best thing about Gotham (apart from Sean Pertwee, surprisingly). Has he been doing anything more than been grumpy in season two, do you know?

  • benjitek

    I have a hard time sitting through an entire episode of Gotham, though I think it might be an OK show once they fast forward a decade-ish and start doing Batman stories. Many episodes back I'd already endured way more information than I wanted on villain origins and Commissioner Gordon. I have sort of watched the last 2 episodes as they gave Bruce more airtime — fast-forwarding through any scenes he wasn't in. He's still 'brooding', but his feelings did poke through towards a love-interest… only to get burned. Unfortunately, it was all surrounded in a plot concocted by writers who were grasping at straws. That's all concluded, next up: Mr. Freeze's origins… yay…

  • Ah. Sounds like I was right to give up on it then. The Penguin stuff was all good, but everything else villainous just was too daft for my taste

  • benjitek

    You're very wise 🙂

  • Pingback: The Medium is Not Enough TV blog()