Tuesday’s “Channel 4’s new dramas, Fry and Laurie reunite, NBC’s pirate show and a Rob Riggle comedy” news

Film

  • Alan Rickman to play Hilly Kristal in CBGB founder’s biopic

Trailers

  • Trailer for The Good Doctor with Orlando Bloom

UK TV

US TV

  • Richard Burgi to guest on Burn Notice, Gloria Votsis to return to White Collar
  • Oh wait. Season seven will be the last for 30 Rock
  • Kate Hudson and Sarah Jessica Parker to recur on Glee
  • Sunday ratings: Desperate Housewives finishes with 11.1m

US TV pilots

Weird-arse movies that Channel 4 showed in the 1980s based on Arabian mythology that you remember being weirded out by when you watched them and that starred Peter Firth and Nabil Shaban #1: Born of Fire

It’s going to be a short series.

Unusual and violent activity is observed on the surface of the sun during an eclipse. A dormant volcano erupts in Turkey. A musician (Peter Firth) is haunted by a strange melody. These are the starting points of what turns out to be a surrealist journey into Arabic mythology.

After meeting an astronomer (Suzan Crowley) who observed the strange activity on the sun, Firth visits his mother on her deathbed. She tells him of the Master Musician, a mysterious being living in Turkey, where his father, also a musician, died a long time ago.

Firth takes off for Turkey, to face the demons of his father’s past and find this mythical Master Musician. His trip takes us deep into the heart of arabic mythology, into a world inhabited by Djinns and Shaytans, respectively born of Air and Fire. He will learn many things about his father’s life that will bring him to the brink of insanity.

And there be trailers for some of NBC’s new shows now: Revolution, Go On, The New Normal, Animal Practice, Guys With Kids and Chicago Fire

As if all today’s clips and programme summaries weren’t enough, here are a whole bunch of proper trailers for all NBC’s new shows, as well as their Facebook and Google+ pages (good luck with that one, guys) and their Twitter accounts and hashtags. Any look good to you?

REVOLUTION
Facebook
Twitter #Revolution
Google+

GO ON
Facebook
Twitter #GoOn
Google+

THE NEW NORMAL
Facebook
Twitter #NewNormal
Google+

ANIMAL PRACTICE
Facebook
Twitter #AnimalPractice
Google+

GUYS WITH KIDS
Facebook
Twitter #GuysWithKids
Google+

CHICAGO FIRE
Facebook
Twitter #ChicagoFire
Google+

Question of the week: is swearing all right when no one understands it’s swearing?

Secret swearing has a long and honourable TV and movie tradition. Usually intended to outwit the censors, it can vary in execution but ultimately has the same aim. Star Trek: The Next Generation allowed Jean-Luc Picard to say merde, because it was assumed that no US viewers would understand it meant sh*t in French. Star Trek itself managed to sneak Uhura denying that she was a ‘fair maiden’ past the censor, while Battlestar Galactica pioneered new forms of swearing altogether with copious use of the word ‘frack’ as a replacement for the f-word.

The Avengers/Avengers Assemble recently took a leaf out of Worzel Gummidge‘s book – a show in which Jon Pertwee used to delight himself by using as many Elizabethan swearwords, including the likes of ‘swive’ as he possibly could – by having Loki describe Black Widow as a ‘mewling q**m’ – that would be a word that rhymes with ‘whim’ and is a Chaucerian synonym for the c-word. Now, if you look at the BBFC’s web site [spoilers], it gives an explanation in its extended classification information as to why it gave the film a 12A certificate:

The film also contains some mild bad language, such as uses of ‘hell’, ‘damn’, ‘ass’, ‘son of a bitch’, ‘pissed off’ and ‘bastards’

No mention of the use of the q-word. Whether that’s because no one at the BBFC knows what it means or because they figured that no one in the audience is likely to know or care, I can’t say. But it does lead to this week’s question:

Should the BBFC take into account swearing that only a portion of the audience will understand when it classifies movies? Should TV shows and movies forego fake swearing that has the same intent as swearing? Or is this all linguistic silliness?

Answers below or on your own blog, please