Thursday’s “The Best Little Akira, Laverne and Shirley in a Big Whorehouse Valley in Hawaii” remake news

Doctor Who

  • Interview with guest actor Neve McIntosh reveals returning monster [spoilers]

Film

British TV

US TV

Question of the week: what’s acceptable TV viewing?

In honour of boundary-breaking Spartacus, this week’s question asks you, the gentle reader:

What’s acceptable TV viewing?

Is graphic violence okay? Full-frontal nudity of either gender? Sex? What kinds of sex? Swearing? Any particular words verboten? Should there be different rules for different times or different channels? Does sex, violence and bad language devalue the human soul? Is it demeaning to women – or men? Or should anything go since that’s what life’s like?

As always, leave a comment with your answer or a link to your answer on your own blog.

The CarusometerA Carusometer rating of 4
Spartacus: Blood and Sand
US TV

Third-episode verdict: Spartacus – Blood and Sand

It’s hard to know what the makers of Spartacus: Blood and Sand think they’re doing. It could be the show is intended as a way:

  • to exploit the liberal regulatory regime on US cable television to push the boundaries of acceptable taste
  • to show us what a graphic novel, complete with rubbish dialogue and plotting, would be like if it were turned into a TV series
  • to replace traditional dialogue with nothing but swearing
  • to give Lucy Lawless some work
  • to give lots of bad New Zealand and Australian actors work
  • to educate and inform viewers who missed HBO’s Rome about what life was like in Roman times
  • to homage I, Claudius.

No matter, three episodes in, it’s time to decide whether to keep watching or not.

Continue reading “Third-episode verdict: Spartacus – Blood and Sand”