TV reviews

A complete archive of The Medium is Not Enough’s reviews of TV programmes since 2005

The CarusometerA Carusometer rating of 2

Third-episode verdict: Royal Pains

20 June 2009 Rob Buckley 2 Comments

Over the summer, it seems, if you’re going to watch any network’s programming, USA has it all sown up. While NBC is sticking out bland-to-rubbish content like Merlin and The Listener, and the other networks are content with re-runs, rubbish and reality TV (mix that up as much as you like), USA is quietly sticking out some of its best work. Burn Notice has been topping the ratings for three seasons now and Royal Pains, its new Thursday-night stablemate, is shaping up pretty well, too.

We’re three episodes in, now, and as I said during my review of the really quite good first episode, the show could have gone one of two ways: desperately dull or still entertaining and leisurely – a perfect summer show. Happily, it’s continued in the same vein as before, a kind of cross between Gossip Girl (but without the excesses), House (but without the mean nasty doctors, just the nice ones), MacGyver (but without the mullet or spies) and The Apprentice (but without the strange hairpiece) in which amiable doctor Mark Feuerstein has to work out what the matter is with a bunch rich people (and anyone else he comes across), usually with the aid of whatever he finds lying around, all the while trying to build a new business and romance the local hospital administrator.

And it does it all very well. The relationships are nicely handled, nothing seems too forced, nothing too bad seems to happen, and no matter how rich or how poor characters are, they all seem relatively nice. It’s a feel good show about people feeling well.

If I had to criticise, Dr Hank’s brother is a bit of an arse and deserves a spade to the back of the head, and in an effort to stay away from anything too unpleasant for too long, there’s a little shallowness to the characterisations. But it’s just a nice to show to watch. It would last about five seconds in a winter schedule, but in summer, you’d be hard pressed to find anything better or more apt.

Carusometer rating: 2
Rob’s predication: Should last for a good few seasons, unless the American economy falls into a giant hole in the next year or so. Or at least a bigger giant hole.  

US TV

Review: Hawthorne 1×1

18 June 2009 Rob Buckley 5 Comments

In the US: Tuesdays, 9/8c, TNT

There’s a sudden rush to get dramas about nurses onto our screens. We’ve already had Nurse Jackie on Showtime, Mercy is coming to NBC in the Fall and now we have TNT lifting the lid off Hawthorne.

Unlike Nurse Jackie, Hawthorne is one of those caring, sharing angelic types of nurses, who do their best in terrible circumstances, never doing anything bad. And much like its eponymous heroine, the show might have its heart in the right place, but it’s also very, very dull.

Continue reading “Review: Hawthorne 1×1”

UK TV

Review: That Mitchell and Webb Look 3×1

12 June 2009 Rob Buckley 5 Comments

That Mitchell and Webb Look

In the UK: Thursdays, 10pm, BBC2

They’re back. The ubiquitous Robert Webb and David Mitchell are back! Of course, being ubiquitous, it’s not like they seem to have gone away, of course, but here they are, back again, with a new series of That Mitchell and Webb Look, which is – equally, of course – based on their radio show That Mitchell and Webb Sound.

When people say ubiquitous, they generally mean that in a bad way. But having Robert Webb and David Mitchell on just about every TV and radio programme on every TV channel imaginable – whether it’s talking about poetry, dancing on Comic Relief, acting on Peep Show, appearing on game show panels or featuring in ads – is actually a good thing. Because they are very, very funny.

Most of the time.

Continue reading “Review: That Mitchell and Webb Look 3×1”

UK TV

Review: Property Snakes & Ladders 1×1

11 June 2009 Rob Buckley 8 Comments

Property Snakes and Ladders

In the UK: Tuesdays, 8pm, C4

Hard to believe it, I know, but Property Ladder and everyone’s favourite property developer, Sarah Beeny, have been with us for over eight years. With each series of the show, Beeny has regaled us with advice on how to make money from property, using the examples of regular people turned property developers to show us what to do – and more often what not to do.

Typically, the show would run as follows: Beeny turns up on the doorsteps of two developers. The developers tell Beeny what they intend to do. It’s just plain awful, stupid or wrong, so Beeny gives them some better ideas. They still do what they intended to do. They cock up significantly, spending masses more money than they needed to. Then they relent, do as Beeny suggested, and hey presto, all’s good with the world again. Then, at the end, despite the cock-ups and over-ambition, Beeny reveals that "thanks to a rising market", they still managed to make money.

Well, guess what. The rising market has gone. It has ceased to be.

So, you might ask, what’s the point of Property Ladder? Can it survive in this climate?

The short answer is no. However, the long answer is yes, but only if it gets a name change.

Ladies and gentlemen, may I present to you Property Snakes & Ladders.

Continue reading “Review: Property Snakes & Ladders 1×1”

The CarusometerA Carusometer rating of 3

Third-episode verdict: Mental

10 June 2009 Rob Buckley 3 Comments

Time for a third-episode verdict, I think. The first episodes of any show are always a bit mental, so it’s forgivable that the first episode of Mental was a touch touched.

Nevertheless, since then, there have been definite signs of improvement. While we’re still in airy fairy Patch Adams land, where anyone associated with pharmaceutical companies must be pure evil and any kind of standard therapeutic practice is too much head when all we really need is heart, Mental has started to realise that maybe there’s some method to psychiatry’s madness.

Episode two, while still bat-sh*t crazy enough that even the characters had to point out how bat-sh*t crazy (dangerous, expensive, etc) Dr Lovely’s planned treatment was, did acknowledge that sometimes all you need isn’t love. It also managed to flesh out the characters a little more, set up the ‘romantic intrigues’ more realistically (and offensively in one case), and give us a House-ian mystery to deal with. Okay, the romance mainly consisted of whether a wife should cheat on her husband, so not that romantic, but at least we had some character work.

On the face of it, episode three should have been a lot worse. It featured both the late David Carradine doing little more than sitting paralysed in a wheelchair and Estella Warren doing little more than pouting and emoting, and phased out “all you need is love” in favour of “tough love”. It also had Dr Lovely kicking pharmaceutical sales reps down flights of stairs – something I’m sure won’t come back to haunt him – as well as the beginning of an evil plot against Dr Lovely from evil pharmaceutical people’s allies. And the romance was dialled down to zero.

However, since it still came across as vaguely rational, it really wasn’t that much worse at all, and it did at least add flesh to the ‘Becca’ subplot – who is the mysterious mentalist Dr Lovely is always on the phone to? Well, now we know.

It’s really not that brilliant. None of the characters is compelling. Dr Lovely acts like he’s on Vallium the whole time, and everyone else is either pretty batty, but not in an interesting way, or just dull. The plots have tended towards ‘mental illness of the week’ territory and while they’ve all been interesting in their own ways, their resolution has tended towards the irritating, stupid or just plain wrong.

It’s not without redeeming features – it’s simply not got that much going for it.

Incidentally, it turns out it’s a Canadian co-prod. I did not know that.

Carusometer rating: 3
Rob’s prediction: Will be lucky if it lasts a season, but it certainly won’t make it to two.