Canadian TV

Review: Second Jen 1×1-1×2 (Canada: City)


In Canada: Thursdays, 8.30pm ET/PT, City

I’m thinking of banning all best friends from writing and starring in TV shows together. The litany of TV shows that are terribly, terribly amusing for those appearing in them but terribly, terribly tedious for those watching them is long and indeed terrible: Doll and EmBest Friends ForeverPlaying House, Idiotsitter and now Second Jen from Canada’s City network.

The title is a pun, since it’s about two Asian-Canadian women, both of them second-generation immigrants, both of them called Jen. Doesn’t quite work, though, does it? I mean, who’s the second one? Two Jens would be accurate; Second Jen is something that’s trying to be clever but that can’t quite work out how to do the pun and make the format fit, so just leaves it in a halfway house between clever and funny where it’s actually neither.

How apt.

The two best friends, a Filipina-Canadian (Amanda Joy) and a Chinese-Canadian (Samantha Wan), decide to move in together to try to escape their overbearing families. And next door to them are a couple of cute young hipsters (Munro Chambers and Al Mukadam). Who knows? Maybe there’ll be romance between the four low IQ millennials, as well as a bit of culture-clash comedy – perhaps about authentic Chinese cusine and its propensity to include unappetising bits of animal? That’s new, isn’t it?

Gosh, what fun they seem to be having together. So much fun. So much appreciation of their own jokes. So much obvious willing of the audience to laugh at what the two of them think is funny. So much hammy acting by everyone in the cast to let the audience know they’re watching a comedy, just in case.

Maybe some of the audience is laughing at yet another overbearing Asian tiger mum character (Janet Lo) who uses food and passive aggressive conversation to control her kids while her husband (Richard Tse) literally never says a word. Ever. How amusing it is for everyone that he never says anything, while everyone keeps going on about how chatty he is. That joke never once got old over the course of the first two episodes. Maybe some of the audience is laughing, too. But I doubt it.

Kudos at least to City for giving a sitcom about two young Asian-Canadian women a chance; kudos also to both Joy and Wan for having the wherewithal to write the pilot and make it, after getting bored of having to auditioning for the same old stereotypical roles.

But seriously, don’t let best friends write in and star in TV shows together. Write in. Star in. Not both. Because the only ones laughing will be the friends.

The BarrometerA Barrometer rating of 3

Third-episode verdict: Eyewitness (US: USA)

In the US: Sundays, 10/9c, USA

On the face of it, Eyewitness isn’t a hard show to understand. An adaptation of NRK Norway’s Øyevitne (Eyewitness), it sees two teenage boys witness a horrible murder of a gang of criminals out in rural New York state. The killer gets away but knows someone witnessed his crime. However, the two boys would rather no one know what they saw or that they were even together, so don’t tell anyone.

And that’s basically the plot for the first three episodes. It’s complicated somewhat at the end of episode two by the revelation that the murderer is actually (spoiler alert) the new local head of the FBI and that the foster mother of one of the boys is the local sheriff. It’s also diluted by a side-plot about the fact the two boys are gay, but only one of them has really come to terms with this. But that’s more or less the show.

Which is what’s hard to understand. So used am I to big twists, plots within plots, hugely serial storylines involving large ensemble casts that something so ordinary, so regular, so meat and potatoes is hard to fathom. What’s the selling point? What’s the big reason for watching? I can’t see it.

Sure, it’s a bit edgy, with some nice direction by Twilight‘s Catherine Harwicke. The evil, unstoppable, Terminator-like bad guy in a position of authority from whom the boys are trying to escape is also a hebephile – because he wasn’t evil enough – which is unusual. There’s a LGBT storyline that for a change is not about pretty lesbians but pretty boys, which is also unusual. There’s an obvious The Killing vibe to the whole piece, with just a touch of No Country For Old Men, with the community grieving and the sheriff in particular struggling to cope while El Terminator cuts a swathe through the population of local teenagers with ruthless efficiency. There’s also a bit of moral compromise, with a local FBI agent having to cover up her sister’s involvement in the case.

And all of this would work very nicely with a Norwegian accent and two hours of daylight, but in a sunnier, more hopeful American context, everything feels very vanilla and apple pie rather than claustrophobic and exposing of the horror deep in the core of the human spirit. It’s not bad, but it’s also not a huge step above the average episode of Law & Order.

I might keep watching for the prettiness of the direction, but Eyewitness is probably a show that worked a whole lot better as Øyevitne than as Eyewitness.

Barrometer rating: 3
Would it work better with a female lead? N/A
TMINE’s prediction: It’s an anthology show, so everything changes at the end of the season, so it might get a second chance if it’s lucky.

What have you been watching? Including Falling Water, Hyde and Seek, Lucifer, Supergirl and Timeless

It’s “What have you been watching?”, my chance to tell you what movies and TV I’ve been watching recently that I haven’t already reviewed and your chance to recommend things to everyone else (and me) in case I’ve missed them.

The usual “TMINE recommends” page features links to reviews of all the shows I’ve ever recommended, and there’s also the Reviews A-Z, for when you want to check more or less anything I’ve reviewed ever. 

As a great man once said, “Never give up! Never surrender!” I’ve been away for a few days, during which I watched close to zero TV, but that doesn’t mean I won’t have caught up again by next week.

In the past seven days, I’ve reviewed the first episodes of The Great Indoors (US: CBS; UK: ITV2) and Pure Genius (US: CBS; UK: Universal), as well as passed third-episode verdicts on Travelers (Canada: Showcase; UK: Netflix) and Dirk Gently’s Holistic Agency (US: BBC America; UK: Netflix). But in the next few days, I’m hoping to have reviewed in some form or other Good Behavior (US: TNT), People of Earth (US: TBS), Stan Against Evil (US: IFC), Second Jen (Canada: City) and Frontier (Canada: Discovery; UK: Netflix), and maybe pass a third-episode verdict on Eyewitness (US: USA) as well. Fingers crossed, lovely wife and I will have made it through to the end of the rather good The Crown (Netflix), too.

But of the regulars, I’ve not watched as much as I should or would have liked, meaning that after the jump, I’ll only be able to regale you my thoughts on the latest eps of Falling Water, The Flash, Hyde and Seek, Lucifer, Supergirl and Timeless. Still, this is ‘What have you been watching?’, so why not let everyone else know what you’ve been up to?

Continue reading “What have you been watching? Including Falling Water, Hyde and Seek, Lucifer, Supergirl and Timeless”

The BarrometerA Barrometer rating of 3

Third-episode verdict: Dirk Gently’s Holistic Detective Agency

In the US: Saturdays, 9/8c, BBC America
In the UK: Netflix. To be made available December 11

Dirk Gently is still odd. Dirk Gently? Only a little.

Following in the footsteps of BBC Four, BBC America’s adaptation of Douglas Adams’ Dirk Gently’s Holistic Detective Agency isn’t really an adaptation at all, more a continuation, in which Dirk is relocated to the US where he and hapless new sidekick Elijah Wood have to investigate the weird death of rich guy Julian McMahon, who’s killed in a hotel room by a shark – and who predicted he would be, months before his own death.

The first episode simply went from odd, inexplicable thing after odd, inexplicable thing, all seemingly unconnected, but in actuality laying out the clues that would all come together later on. Naturally, that’s meant the subsequent two episodes have both been about tying everything together and explaining what’s so important about a particular corgie, why there’s such a thing as a holistic assassin randomly murdering people and why a missing girl is holed up with Chief Tyrol from Battlestar Galactica. And by episode three it all seems to be coming together quite well – squint and you can see what’s going on – while still adding on the occasional new bit of odd.

Now, on the one hand, this is all divorced from the book(s), following none of their events. On the other, it’s got direct lifts from the books that have been altered to reflect more American concerns, with (third episode spoiler alert) time machines being built into basements of old houses rather than old Cambridge colleges, more familial elements, the CIA (of course) and – oh the horror! – an unnecessary origin story of sorts evolving for Dirk himself. 

What it definitely still is is bonkers, offering something that is as close to an American equivalent of a Douglas Adams story as I can remember. It’s not blessed by his genius when it comes to original ideas or comedy, but it comes reasonably close to a decent emulation and is actually pretty clever.

This new Dirk Gently’s Holistic Detective Agency isn’t must-see TV by a long-chalk and Samuel Barnett is only just about tolerable as this new incarnation of Dirk. But it’s better than the BBC Four version, closer in spirit to the books and is more imaginative. If you fancy believing six impossible things before breakfast, give it a whirl. 

Barrometer rating: 3
Would it be better with a female lead? Yes. Or Richard Schiff
TMINE’s prediction: Might well get a second season, but Netflix will get the final say.

The BarrometerA Barrometer rating of 2

Third-episode verdict: Travelers (Canada: Showcase; UK: Netflix)

In Canada: Mondays, 9pm ET, Showcase
In the UK: Acquired by Netflix

So I have to admit to really rather enjoying Travelers, Canada’s latest piece of world-beating science-fiction in which a group of time travelers from the future project their souls back into the bodies of people dying in the present day, so that they can prevent a terrible disaster from happening. They possess the skills, they know what they’ve got to do – what they don’t know is what their ‘hosts’ lives were like before they died.

The first episode was a nice, edgy but still humorous piece of work that introduced us to the team’s old hosts, before introducing in less detail the team themselves. Episode two then gave us more of an introduction to the team members and the types of missions they’d go on.

I thought that would be the pattern laid down for the rest of the series, but what became clearer in the third episode is that the show may essentially bea spy show with a bunch of sleeper agents waking up from their normal lives to undertake secret missions, but it’s also as much about relationships and character as anything else. As well as continuing to focus on the different lives of the hosts to demonstrate how much detail there is that can get overlooked and what patterns of behaviour are expected of us, it also looked at the psychological impact of knowing how the future will turn out and who will live, who will die, how and when. Could you stand back and let others perish, knowing all you had to do was say “Don’t go left there for another minute” and they could live?

What saves the show from being a gloomy, self-important piece of sci-fi is a combination of the performances and the characters. Eric McCormack of Will and Grace is cast against type as an FBI agent, and his character manages to give the show a much needed sense of humour. MacKenzie Porter’s closed performance makes her formerly learning disabled host come smart doctor a source of intrigue, while Reilly Dolman’s douchebag school quarterback turned kind engineer gives the show heart and gentility. 

But there are jokes, too. No show that can use pre-pubescent children as temporal radio transmitters can take itself too seriously.

Travelers is a thoughtful, but often action-packed piece of science-fiction with feeling that isn’t that bothered with saving the future – there are dozens of other ‘travelers’ around the world so maybe they’ll do it. Instead, it’s more concerned with people. It could do with fixing a few plotholes and making its crack team of spies just a little bit better at blending in, but its focus on the little things in life is welcome in a genre so focused on the intellectual and the abstract.

Barrometer rating: 2
Would it be better with a female lead? N/A
TMINE’s prediction: Should run for a good few seasons