News: Ghost in the Shell, Taboo trailers; no First Wives Club; + more

Film trailers

  • Trailer for Ghost in the Shell, with Scarlett Johansson

Internet TV

UK TV

New UK TV shows

US TV

New US TV shows

Canadian TV

Review: Second Jen 1×1-1×2 (Canada: City)


In Canada: Thursdays, 8.30pm ET/PT, City

I’m thinking of banning all best friends from writing and starring in TV shows together. The litany of TV shows that are terribly, terribly amusing for those appearing in them but terribly, terribly tedious for those watching them is long and indeed terrible: Doll and EmBest Friends ForeverPlaying House, Idiotsitter and now Second Jen from Canada’s City network.

The title is a pun, since it’s about two Asian-Canadian women, both of them second-generation immigrants, both of them called Jen. Doesn’t quite work, though, does it? I mean, who’s the second one? Two Jens would be accurate; Second Jen is something that’s trying to be clever but that can’t quite work out how to do the pun and make the format fit, so just leaves it in a halfway house between clever and funny where it’s actually neither.

How apt.

The two best friends, a Filipina-Canadian (Amanda Joy) and a Chinese-Canadian (Samantha Wan), decide to move in together to try to escape their overbearing families. And next door to them are a couple of cute young hipsters (Munro Chambers and Al Mukadam). Who knows? Maybe there’ll be romance between the four low IQ millennials, as well as a bit of culture-clash comedy – perhaps about authentic Chinese cusine and its propensity to include unappetising bits of animal? That’s new, isn’t it?

Gosh, what fun they seem to be having together. So much fun. So much appreciation of their own jokes. So much obvious willing of the audience to laugh at what the two of them think is funny. So much hammy acting by everyone in the cast to let the audience know they’re watching a comedy, just in case.

Maybe some of the audience is laughing at yet another overbearing Asian tiger mum character (Janet Lo) who uses food and passive aggressive conversation to control her kids while her husband (Richard Tse) literally never says a word. Ever. How amusing it is for everyone that he never says anything, while everyone keeps going on about how chatty he is. That joke never once got old over the course of the first two episodes. Maybe some of the audience is laughing, too. But I doubt it.

Kudos at least to City for giving a sitcom about two young Asian-Canadian women a chance; kudos also to both Joy and Wan for having the wherewithal to write the pilot and make it, after getting bored of having to auditioning for the same old stereotypical roles.

But seriously, don’t let best friends write in and star in TV shows together. Write in. Star in. Not both. Because the only ones laughing will be the friends.

News

News: Walter acquires Valkyrien; 4-way superhero crossover, Magicians, Valerian, Expanse trailers; + more

Film trailers

  • Trailer for Luc Besson’s Valerian and the City of a Thousand Planets

Internet TV

European TV

New UK TV shows

US TV

US TV show casting

New US TV shows

News: more DC’s Legends of Tomorrow; a Time Bandits TV show?; Rosie O’Donnell’s SMILF; + more

Internet TV

US TV

US TV show casting

New US TV shows

New US TV show casting

The BarrometerA Barrometer rating of 3

Third-episode verdict: Eyewitness (US: USA)

In the US: Sundays, 10/9c, USA

On the face of it, Eyewitness isn’t a hard show to understand. An adaptation of NRK Norway’s Øyevitne (Eyewitness), it sees two teenage boys witness a horrible murder of a gang of criminals out in rural New York state. The killer gets away but knows someone witnessed his crime. However, the two boys would rather no one know what they saw or that they were even together, so don’t tell anyone.

And that’s basically the plot for the first three episodes. It’s complicated somewhat at the end of episode two by the revelation that the murderer is actually (spoiler alert) the new local head of the FBI and that the foster mother of one of the boys is the local sheriff. It’s also diluted by a side-plot about the fact the two boys are gay, but only one of them has really come to terms with this. But that’s more or less the show.

Which is what’s hard to understand. So used am I to big twists, plots within plots, hugely serial storylines involving large ensemble casts that something so ordinary, so regular, so meat and potatoes is hard to fathom. What’s the selling point? What’s the big reason for watching? I can’t see it.

Sure, it’s a bit edgy, with some nice direction by Twilight‘s Catherine Harwicke. The evil, unstoppable, Terminator-like bad guy in a position of authority from whom the boys are trying to escape is also a hebephile – because he wasn’t evil enough – which is unusual. There’s a LGBT storyline that for a change is not about pretty lesbians but pretty boys, which is also unusual. There’s an obvious The Killing vibe to the whole piece, with just a touch of No Country For Old Men, with the community grieving and the sheriff in particular struggling to cope while El Terminator cuts a swathe through the population of local teenagers with ruthless efficiency. There’s also a bit of moral compromise, with a local FBI agent having to cover up her sister’s involvement in the case.

And all of this would work very nicely with a Norwegian accent and two hours of daylight, but in a sunnier, more hopeful American context, everything feels very vanilla and apple pie rather than claustrophobic and exposing of the horror deep in the core of the human spirit. It’s not bad, but it’s also not a huge step above the average episode of Law & Order.

I might keep watching for the prettiness of the direction, but Eyewitness is probably a show that worked a whole lot better as Øyevitne than as Eyewitness.

Barrometer rating: 3
Would it work better with a female lead? N/A
TMINE’s prediction: It’s an anthology show, so everything changes at the end of the season, so it might get a second chance if it’s lucky.