What have you been watching? Including The Grand Tour, Hypernormalisation, Doctor Doctor and Hyde & Seek

It’s “What have you been watching?”, my chance to tell you what movies and TV I’ve been watching recently that I haven’t already reviewed and your chance to recommend things to everyone else (and me) in case I’ve missed them. There’s also the Reviews A-Z, for when you want to check more or less anything I’ve reviewed ever. 

Ironically, just as I’ve started catching up with everything again, we’re about to enter the lull in US TV marked by Thanksgiving December. That means that this week will probably be marked by ventures into Internet TV again, including, I hope, a return to Le bureau des légendes (The Bureau). But always expect the unexpected, since there’ll be a few new shows popping up, I’m sure. Hell, Australian Community TV just debuted the six-part ghostly Sonnigsburg, so I’m sure there’ll be something coming along I wasn’t expecting.

Elsewhere this week, I reviewed Good Behavior (US: TNT) and Shooter (US: USA; UK: Netflix). We’ve still not got round to watching any more of The Crown, Westworld or Humans, and I’ve not yet made a start on Y Gwyll, so that means that after the jump, we’ll be looking at the latest episodes of Ash vs Evil Dead, Chance, DC’s Legends of Tomorrow, Designated Survivor, Dirk Gently’s Holistic Detective Agency, Falling Water, Frequency, Good Behavior, The Great Indoors, Lethal Weapon, Lucifer, People of Earth, Supergirl, Timeless and Travelers, as well as the season finales of Doctor Doctor and Hyde and Seek. One show’s getting promoted, at leat one show’s getting dropped – can you guess which?

But first, as well as a film review, a slight diversion from TMINE’s normal remit…

The Grand Tour (Amazon)
TMINE’s dedication to scripted shows wasn’t always so pure, back in the day. That meant I used to cover shows that included Top Gear. That stopped a while ago, in part because of the shift in focus caused by there not being enough time in the world to watch unscripted as well as scripted TV, but also in part because I stopped watching Top Gear – it had simply stopped doing anything new, and I was bored.

Following Jeremy Clarkson’s leaving the BBC, James May and Richard Hammond in his wake, the Top Gear trio signed up with Amazon to do a new show. What manner of show it would be we didn’t know, because Clarkson allegedly had a non-compete clause prohibiting him from doing another car show. Given the name, The Grand Tour, maybe it was just going to be a bunch of the old Top Gear travel documentaries.

Anyway, for old time’s sake, I decided to ‘tune in’ today to see what The Grand Tour was like.

Guess what. It’s… a car show. More so, it’s Top Gear again, just a bit swearier and a bit glossier. More or less every feature of Top Gear has, in fact, moved over to The Grand Tour (note the reversed initials in the title), with just a few changes.

For starters, in its first episode at least, it simply relocates its studio setting from an old hangar in SW London to a tent in the Mojave desert, with each subsequent episode relocating the show to another part of the world (Johannesburg and Barbados have been promised).

From inside the tent, surrounded by a native audience, the trio then do the same bickering routine as always, with plenty of races with supercars to break that up. However, everything is done on an Amazon budget, with computer graphics, travel to Portugal for races, et al. And where an element might have got copyright-infringingly close to Top Gear, the show makes changes to the format. Gone is the Stig, replaced by… The American, a tame Nascar driver, for example, and since they can’t use the Top Gear track to test cars any more, they’ve had to use a different one.

As I said, the reason I gave up on Top Gear was that it stopped innovating. Unsurprisingly perhaps, it’s all the changes, rather than the keepers from the Top Gear format, that are the best bits of The Grand Tour and remind you how good the former was before it started coasting. The celebrity guest spot was great; the new parts of the track are great; the more scripted aspects of the audience interactions are great; the celebrity guests spot was great.

Where it was at its most dull was when it was Jeremy Clarkson just driving around in a supercar to amuse himself. Nearly nodded off at that point I did.

As a show, Top Gear was at its best when it was all three of the hosts together in an engine-driven bickerfest travelogue in the style of Three Men In A Boat. The fewer of the hosts together and the more it was about cars, the less interesting it became. If the producers of The Grand Tour remember this and remember not to rest on their laurels, The Grand Tour could become what Top Gear once was – a weekly fixture in our house.

Hypernormalisation (iPlayer)
I’d already given you the bingo card, but I’ve now had a chance to watch this latest Adam Curtis documentary about why the world is the way it is. Impeccably timed to arrive in a post-Brexit, post-Trump world, it shows how attempts to create stability without politics has given us an era in which everything seems real, nothing seems true and no one wants to do anything about it through politics for fear that the boat will be rocked in ways no one can predict.

Clocking in at just under three hours, Hypernormalisation gives us all manner of brilliant and astonishing documentary footage, but is still the least persuasive of Curtis’ oeuvre so far. Ironically, given that Curtis critiques our need for simplistic answers to complex problems, his argument is probably too simplistic to be true. But it still takes us to exciting thoughts and considerations about the world that are probably close to the truth but which nevertheless are just hints at the real truth – if such a thing now exists.

All the same, simply through reminding us of all manner of things that have long since been forgotten about, as well as of the fact that what’s normal now wasn’t always, it’s well worth a watch.

Continue reading “What have you been watching? Including The Grand Tour, Hypernormalisation, Doctor Doctor and Hyde & Seek”

Question of the week: what shall we call cancelled shows now that cancelled is cancelled?

Earlier this year, Fred had a request:

Hi Rob, firstly I’m a big fan of your site, many thanks; but as customary I must follow a compliment with a complaint, albeit a small one! As has happened on several occasions, while digesting your daily snippets with a bowlful of porridge, I have nearly choked by the headline that one of my favorite shows has been CANCELLED!! My blood pressure subsequently drops after I’ve clicked the link and discovered that in fact the show in question (Episodes today!) is actually just ending after it’s final season. For me Cancelled means a show has been pulled usually without any chance of resolution (I know sometimes the writers get enough time to create a hurried ending). But a show Ending after it’s final season (which hasn’t started airing and sometimes hasn’t even finished filming) usually means the creatives will be given an opportunity to conclude their story. I know grey areas exist, but surely if Cancelled and Ending are interchangeable then effectively all shows are ultimately cancelled (except the Simpson, that’ll never die!). I hope you could maybe reword some of your headlines in the future, if only just to prevent spike rises in my, and I’m sure a few others, Blood Pressure!

We then mused muchly on what it actually means for a show to be cancelled in this day and age. It involved some legal talk.

However, it seems that we’re not the only ones having problems with ‘cancelled’. The Hollywood Reporter says that the word is on the way out:

Getting canceled is a television rite of passage that dates back to the early days of the medium. But you’re not likely to hear the word often in executive suites these days. As viewership fractures and the bar between success and failure becomes more blurred than ever, broadcast networks have become more gun-shy of outright yanking a show off the air.

Hence the rise last season of wishy-washy buzzwords such as “trimmed” or “reduced” as unproduced episodes foretold a slow death for several shows. That trend has continued this season. ABC dud Notorious was reduced from 13 to nine episodes, and on Nov. 8, the network said it would not order more of Hayley Atwell’s barely watched Conviction, but it wouldn’t be pulled from the schedule (at least not immediately).

It then lists the different euphemisms for cancelled/dwindling support for, used by various networks over the past couple of years:

  • ‘Order Has Been Trimmed’: Notorious (ABC), Making History (Fox), Imaginary Mary (ABC)
  • ‘Unscheduled but Will Air at a Later Date’: Angel From Hell (CBS, 2015), Wicked City (ABC, 2015), The Assets (ABC, 2014)
  • ‘Remaining Episodes Will Air on Hulu’: Selfie (ABC, 2014), Manhattan Love Story (ABC, 2014), Don’t Trust the B— in Apt. 23 (ABC, 2013)
  • ‘Actually … You’re Canceled’: Of Kings and Prophets (ABC, 2015), Welcome to the Family (NBC, 2013), We Are Men (CBS, 2013)

All of which makes reporting the news each day a bit tricky. After all, ‘network doesn’t order any more episodes of’ is difficult to quantify as news – pretty much every day, networks don’t order new episodes of anything, and even if they announce they’re not ordering any more episodes of show, that’s still not cancelled.

So this week’s question of the week is: what should I say instead if a network announces that it won’t order any more episodes of a show… for now? Should I even mention it at all and if I should, what word or phrase should I use? And should it be used an alternative to cancelled, too? Any suggestions?

News: Doctor Who Christmas clip; Emilia Clarke joins Han Solo; + more

Film trailers

Doctor Who

  • Clip from the Christmas special

Internet TV

US TV

US TV show casting

New US TV shows

News: Berlin Station, Graves, The Night Shift renewed; Baby Cow’s Swing Time; BBC4’s Bucket; + more

Internet TV

  • Russell Hornsby, Raul Castillo and Zackary Momoh join Netflix’s Seven Seconds

New UK TV shows

US TV

US TV show casting

New US TV shows

New US TV show casting

Classic TV

Nostalgia Corner: Schalcken the Painter (1979)

Making art history programming interesting, accessible and memorable is a tricky thing. Doing two of those isn’t necessarily hard, but all three is tricky. 

For example, I watched all of Simon Schama’s Power of Art, but while I found it very interesting and accessible, I can’t tell you much about what our Simon said except that Caravaggio was very realistic and good with lighting. For me, it failed in actually educating me about art.

Dramatisation, which was one of Simon’s tactics, can certainly help with making art history interesting and accessible, but there are few arts programmes that have gone as far as Omnibus did in using dramatisation to make it memorable, too. In 1979, the BBC arts programme included an hour-long drama about 17th-century Dutch painter Godfried Schalcken. What was even more novel about it and helped it to be memorable was that rather being a simple biopic, it was also a ghost story.

In common with Jonathan Miller’s original adaptation for Omnibus of Whistle and I’ll Come To You, Schalcken The Painter is not officially part of the BBC’s long-running series A Ghost Story for Christmas. Yet not only did the episode air in the series’ traditional slot of 23 December, vacated when the series was cancelled in 1978, it also fit in tonally, while still being an arts programme dedicated to exploring Schalcken’s life and art.

Based on Sheridan Le Fanu’s short story Strange Event in the Life of Schalken The Painter (sic) and narrated by Charles Gray as’Lefanu’, the episode follows Schalcken (Jeremy Clyde)’s career from his early days as a pupil of Gerard Dou (Maurice Denham), one of Rembrandt’s most famous pupils. 

There he falls in love with Dou’s niece Rose (Cheryl Kennedy), but before they can be betrothed, a pale man called Vanderhausen (John Justin) comes to the door, offering a huge sum of money in exchange for her hand in marriage. Rose begs Schalcken to take her away before the marriage goes ahead. Does he? Well, you’ll have to watch to find out.

Schalcken's ghost

Schalcken the Painter was directed by Leslie Megahey, the producer in charge of Omnibus, who had actually only accepted the job on condition that she could adapt Le Fanu’s short story for the programme. Inspired by Walerian Borowczyk’s Blanche, she shot the film in the style of a docudrama, using the absolute bare minimum of dialogue.

To meet the Omnibus remit, many scenes depict Schalcken recruiting models and posing them for his most powerful works, with Gray exploring the merits of each composition and how it might have derived from Schalcken’s life and mental state.

The most important of these, ironically, is a fake – an adaptation by the production team of ‘Young Girl With A Candle’ in the style of Schalcken that starts and finishes the episode and purports to be the inspiration for Gray’s narration.

Girl with a candle

(Fake) Schalcken picture

But Schalcken is not the only artist to feature. As well as Dou, Rembrandt (Charles Stewart) himself turns up to commission Schalcken. And the production team used the paintings of Vermeer, de Hooch and Dou to learn what interiors of 17th century Dutch domestic dwellings were like, as well to compose scenes.

Schalcken Interior

For the more frightening qualities of the story, they also took inspiration from both Schalcken’s and Rembrandt’s work and their mastery of darkness.

Darkness in Schalcken

Girl posing in 'Shalcken The Painter'

As a piece of art history, the fictional nature of the story obviously means Schalcken The Painter is flawed, particularly since its most enduring image isn’t actually by Schalcken. But it’s now probably more famous than Schalcken himself and certainly more people will have heard of him because of it than would otherwise have done. Certainly, I did.

Here’s the first few minutes, but if you like it, as always, buy it (iTunes if you prefer)!