Third-episode verdict: Robin Hood

Robin Hood

So there was much debate about the first episode of Robin Hood. Just too silly and naff for words? All round, good fun, family entertainment? Bloodless tripe? The jury was out, but the third episode has aired and they’re now ready to pass verdict.

It’s definitely improved. I’ll give it that much. It’s certainly on a par now with the worse episodes of the Jason Connery season of Robin of Sherwood. The heavy-handed political references have died away now the show’s creators have handed writing chores over to people like Paul Cornell. Marian’s got herself something to do. The whole question of whether Robin is actually capable of killing anyone on primetime TV has been answered (he can, but not frequently). So definite improvements all round.

But it’s all very generic. Jonas Armstrong has the charisma of plankton. None of the other members of Robin Hood’s gang has had a second of characterisation or good dialogue between them. And Robin and co have not yet experienced any real dangers: breaking into Sherwood Castle is seemingly about as tricky as turning up at reception and signing in for a visitor’s badge; being hunted by dogs, something that put paid to Robin of Sherwood number one, only resulted in the loss of the gang’s larder.

So for adults, by this third episode, ‘Bobbins Hood’ is probably about right. I think if you’re a kid, this might be relatively enjoyable stuff. But 20 years from now, no one’s going to be fondly remembering it as classic television, I don’t think.

Review: Man to Man with Dean Learner

Man to Man with Dean Lerner

In the UK: Fridays, Channel 4, 11.10pm

In the US: I don’t think so

Garth Marenghi’s Dark Place has been undergoing a revival of late for no adequately explored reason. The SciFi Channel in the US picked it up in July; it’s just come out on DVD. I don’t understand why. It’s not funny.

Okay. Let’s qualify that. Garth Marenghi, a composite of horror writers like Stephen King and Shaun Huston, is funny. The show wasn’t.

Now, from the same writers, comes Man to Man with Dean Learner. And, oh wait, the same characters.

Continue reading “Review: Man to Man with Dean Learner”

Review: Simon Schama’s Power of Art

Simon Schama's Power of Art

In the UK: Fridays, 9pm, BBC2, 9pm. Repeated Fridays, BBC1, 1.40am

In the US: Nowhere yet

There’s a certain quality of being thrown in the deep-end with Simon Schama’s Power of Art. Unless you look at the web site, you’ll be at a loss to know what the point of the show actually is. There’s no introduction, no explanation, just Simon Schama bleating on about Caravaggio from the word go. I thought I’d missed an episode at first. But no. We’re here to watch Simon Schama and it’s about art: that’s all we need to know apparently.

The actual explanation for the show, “This is not a series about things that hang on walls, it is not about decor or prettiness. It is a series about the force, the need, the passion of art… the power of art,” makes approximately no sense whatsoever. Instead, it’s best to think of the show as “Art: The Rock and Roll Years”, a series about ‘interesting’ artists and their lives. On the schedule: Caravaggio, Bernini, Rembrandt, David, Turner, Van Gogh, Picasso and Rothko. And, so far, it’s pretty good.

Continue reading “Review: Simon Schama’s Power of Art”

I’m With Stupid being remade for the US

If you worked for a US network and you wanted to remake a sitcom set in a home for the disabled, who would you get? The Farrelly Brothers, of course. So naturally, that’s whom NBC has hired to retool BBC3’s I’m With Stupid.

That’s quite handy since both 30 Rock (which is very good) and 20 Good Years (the second episode of which I only got halfway through, it was so bad) are not doing at all well in the ratings. Perhaps NBC was right to talk about cutting back on its scripted comedy.