Third-episode verdict: Burn Notice

The Carusometer for Burn Notice
2, a partial Caruso

Oh dear. And it started so promisingly. I really had high hopes for this but the deadening hand of the USA Network has struck again.

The first episode showed promise. Burn Notice could have been a very good spy show with a quirky side. Instead, it’s now a quirky show with a slight spy side. The balance is all off. Worse still, Bruce Campbell has almost nothing to do.

True, Gabrielle Anwar dispensed with her rubbish Irish accent in the second episode, but she replaced it with an American accent that was only slightly better. The arcing “who gave Jeffrey Donovan a burn notice?” plot is now restricted to just a couple of minutes at the start and finish of the episode, while the “let’s help a loser using my special spy powers so that I can learn about family” guff is now the predominant theme of the show. Blurgh.

Still, there’s just a hint of dark left to the show, with Donovan and co willing to bump off, blackmail, fire bomb and generally do anything underhand that they like in order to right wrongs, which can”t be all bad. I suspect that as the arcing plot gathers momentum, we’ll be back to the original promise of the first episode, although I’ll probably be proved wrong.

So The Medium is Not Enough has no great pleasure in declaring Burn Notice a two or “Partial Caruso” on The Carusometer quality scale. A Partial Caruso corresponds to “a show with two walk-on cameos by David Caruso as a self-proclaimed master spy. He will try to get his character, Mick McGrady McMurphy, to explain the history of the Irish Republican Army. Unfortunately, his only only reference material is a copy of Tom Clancy’s Patriot Games and a box of Lucky Charms cereal. Before he can ad lib a scene in which he decides to bomb the ‘train between Dublin and London’, the producers send him a swatch book for his trailer decorations and they are able to recast him before he’s chosen ‘ultramarine’”.




  • Rob,
    I don’t remember seeing anything mentioned here, and the search function didn’t bring it up, but have you been watching ‘John From Cincinnatti’? Curious as to what you think of it – or thought of it if you’ve already bailed….

  • That, my friend, is because you weren’t searching for John From Cincinnati. ‘John From Cincinnatti’ is the alternate Tubeworld version I suspect. You can quickly find what I’ve been watching in the “This week, I’ve mostly been watching…” bit in the left sidebar, which includes JFC (hmm. Clues in the initials?) And here’s a link to my third episode verdict.
    I really like it: Sunday’s was a stonker, wasn’t it?

  • LOL! I’ll have to find out what “stonker” means, but I’m still trying to put my head back together after that sermon in the parking lot! Alan Sepinwall’s blog had the complete transcript of it today and even seeing it in cold print doesn’t help clarify things. But man, I’m jazzed now to see how it all ends.
    I wonder if a new relgiion will someday grow out of a TV show?

  • LOL! I’ll have to find out what “stonker” means, but I’m still trying to put my head back together after that sermon in the parking lot! Alan Sepinwall’s blog had the complete transcript of it today and even seeing it in cold print doesn’t help clarify things. But man, I’m jazzed now to see how it all ends.
    I wonder if a new relgiion will someday grow out of a TV show?

  • Yikes! I posted to that third episode verdict, and I don’t even remember doing so! That cinches it – the synapses are shot!

  • Stonker (definition two)
    “I wonder if a new relgiion will someday grow out of a TV show?”
    I think it might be an old religion in disguise.
    “That cinches it – the synapses are shot!”
    See God, Toby. Hear my father’s word.