Thank you for being open minded and not judging Moonlight solely on its pilot episode. :) Most reviewers do not seem to take the time to revist shows or to admit if they have a change of opinion.

When I first heard about Moonlight and all the behind the scenes drama, I was not sure what to think. However, that was not going to stop me from taking a look. I never expect a new show's first episode to be flawless. After all, the cast and crew just met yesterday. ha! Alex and the spark of story convinced me to keep watching Moonlight. Soooo glad I did! In my opinion, the show really hit its stride with the Fever episode (#4).... and has only grown & improved every week since then.

No other show has compelled me to leave comments all over the Internet, write/call the network, contact reviewers and even create my own blog [moonlightfan on blogspot]. I am happily addicted! :)

XO ~
Kandye

In many ways, the work of a critic is easy. We risk very little, yet enjoy a position of power over those who offer up their work to ourselves and our judgement. We thrive on negative criticism, which is fun to write and to read. But the bitter truth we critics must face is that in the grand scheme of things, the average piece of junk is probably more meaningful than our criticism designating it so. But there are times when a critic actually risks something, and that is in the discovery and defense of the new. The world is often unkind to new talent, new creations. The new needs friends.

It is fun to be naughty, isn't it? ;> That was very well said and thought out. I wish more critics followed that code. Often, it seems they just want to tear down the star, film, show or performance instead of being constructive ~ positive or negative.

You are a rare one, Rob! Thank you :)

Take Care ~
Kandye