Archive | Fall 2007

These entries previewed the new shows that were set to appear on US TV screens in the Fall of 2007, some of which arrived in the UK or were promptly cancelled.


October 30, 2007

Third-episode verdict: Samantha Who?

Posted on October 30, 2007 | Post a comment |

The Carusometer for Samantha Who?2-Partial-Caruso

So, on the one hand, I like Christina Applegate, I like chick-lit (within reason) and I like tales of redemptive amnesia. On the other, I'm not especially wowed by Samantha Who?, a Christina Applegate vehicle that mixes romance, shoe addiction, bitchy friends, a man to be re-won, female failings, female strengths and comedy.

I can't seem to work out why that is. Despite losing some of its 'sitcom-ness' since the first episode, making it a better watch altogether, it's still not grabbing me. The characters are only okay, since they're not especially well drawn. Most of the cast are hamming it up, too. But the scripts have some good lines and the plots are pretty good, although occasionally veer towards cringe comedy when they shouldn't.

Maybe my oestrogen level isn't high enough, but as much as like Samantha Who? in theory, in practice, it's just not coming together for me. It is, to quote the great Joey, 'gentle comedy'. Nothing belly-shaking, just smile-raising.

On the other hand, it would be quite good if it considered itself a romance with comedic moments, rather than an American Bridget Jones. If it ups its game and gets funnier or more romantic, that would just be peachy, too.

At the moment though, The Medium is Not Enough declares Samantha Who? a two or 'Partial Caruso' on The Carusometer quality scale. A Partial Caruso corresponds to “a show with two walk-on cameos by David Caruso as the boyfriend of an amnesiac. However, the producers fire him after he claims he would never have gone out with his on-screen girlfriend because he 'can see from her face that she's a thinker'.”

October 29, 2007

Fifth-episode verdict: Moonlight

Posted on October 29, 2007 | Post a comment |

The Carusometer for Moonlight4-Major-Caruso

I thought, at first, that I'd spoken too soon. After a dismal first episode that mined every previous vampire story going for any clichés it could find, Moonlight started to show signs of promise. There was some originality in its second and third episodes. The story developed, with the season-long arc you might have expected suddenly coming to fruition straight away. If you've been raised on a diet of Angel and Forever Knight, you'd have thought you'd have known what was coming - and you'd have been wrong.

But things started to drop off in the fourth and fifth episodes. While the fourth episode was still no slouch, it had more than trace amounts of stupidity flowing through its veins, as well as a rock video director to mess things up. And the fifth episode was just ridiculous. Not truly abysmal, but certainly full of blatant absurdities that make no sense to anyone who hasn't been up all night listening to Marilyn Manson records.

The cast are pretty good, although Jason Dohring lacks presence and Shannyn Sossamon is thankfully not present most of the time. It has some niceish moments from time to time, and Mick St John is thankfully not as whiney a git as Angel and Nick Knight were. But it's still a bit dull, a bit stupid and taking a hell of a lot of time getting to the point.

The Medium is Not Enough hereby declares Moonlight is a 4 or “Major Caruso” on The Carusometer quality scale. A Major Caruso corresponds to “a show that David Caruso might exec produce or star in after reading an Anne Rice novel in an airport waiting lounge. After declaring it the 'best story ever writen by a woman', he goes on to cast himself as an immortal Irish vampire with a comb-over. After discovering that he can no longer move fast enough to convince people he has 'human speed', let alone 'vampire speed', he tries to get into character by biting his own thumb. Discovering it hurts too much, he decides that his character will feed on blood through chocolate straws instead, 'a major new innovation in vampire mythology'.”

Read other posts about:

October 19, 2007

Fifth-episode verdict: Back To You

Posted on October 19, 2007 | 1 comment |

The Carusometer for Back To You5-Full-Caruso

In retrospect, it was must have been pure masochism that led me to hold out for a fifth episode verdict on Back To You. Maybe it was Kelsey Grammer's presence. Maybe the third episode caught me in a good mood. Whatever it was, it was a mistake, and now I've wasted 50 minutes more of my life.

This is awful. It is unoriginal, unfunny, over-acted, unlikeable rubbish. Do not watch it unless you like the idea of being placed in the village stocks and having rotten tomatoes thrown in your face - because that's how enjoyable it is. Even the retro “filmed in front of a live studio audience” voiceover at the beginning à la Cheers cannot redeem it. If there's any justice in the world, it would be cancelled right now, all surviving copies placed in a bin and then incinerated.

So The Medium Is Not Enough has great pleasure in declaring Back To You has scored a five or 'Full Caruso' on The Carusometer quality scale. A Full Caruso corresponds to “a show in which David Caruso might be responsible for every aspect of production, including starring, directing, producing and writing it. After casting himself as a veteran newscaster who snarls every story and can't read the prompter because he's wearing sunglasses, he's forced first to bribe the audience to laugh at his frequent blonde jokes then to threaten to have them put in jail for 'all the crimes they've no doubt committed' if they don't so much as giggle. However, when the show is aired in Eastern Europe and its frequent jokes about Albanians are translated, the country declares war on Caruso, forcing him to to change his identity and pretend to be an Alpaca breeder in Patagonia. The show is cancelled in his absence, and peace and goodwill once again return to the Earth.”

Third-episode verdict: Carpoolers

Posted on October 19, 2007 | Post a comment |

The Carusometer for Carpoolers4-Major-Caruso

Oh, it's just arse. I said just about everything that needed to be said back with episode one. There's the germ of a good idea in there - four guys sharing a car and talking about life – and when the show does raise laughs, which it does infrequently, it's always through the scenes set in the car.

It's just when it steps out of the car and into the carpoolers' home life, it becomes complete rubbish. With the slight exception of TJ Miller as the son of one of the carpoolers, there's just no comedy in the ridiculous situations that the writers have created. There could be, but there isn't.

Three episodes are enough. I'm out. I'm not watching it any more.

The Medium is Not Enough hereby declares Carpoolers is a 4 or “Major Caruso” on The Carusometer quality scale. A Major Caruso corresponds to “a show that David Caruso might exec produce or star in after sitting in his SUV for a few hours. After he insists one episode be entirely about the pine-scented air-freshner that hands from the rearview mirror, the cast will rebel, phoning for an ambulance claiming that he's got carbon monoxide poisoning. They'll be gone by the time he returns, leaving him to conduct a 25-minute long monologue instead about the need for capital punishment for anyone who forgets to indicate before changing lanes on the freeway.”

Review: Samantha Who? 1.1

Posted on October 19, 2007 | Post a comment |

Samantha Who?

In the US: Mondays, 9.30/8.30c, ABC
In the UK: Not yet acquired

Christina Applegate's one of those actresses that people seem to love or hate. The haters generally remember her as the teenage daughter in Married With Children? The lovers are the ones who've seen her in something since - maybe as one of Rachel's sisters in Friends or in Anchorman: The Legend of Ron Burgundy.

With such a divided audience, it seems a little strange to create a vehicle for her talents/'talents' (delete according to your attitude towards her). It seems stranger still when you consider the show's obvious creative ancestor: The Bourne Identity.

While Applegate doesn't exactly start kicking people in the head at a moment's notice or start speaking numerous foreign languages, her character Samantha Newly (ooh, a pun, just like Bourne/Born) does wake up one day with no recollection of who she is. As she slowly struggles to piece together her life, she finds out her former self wasn't exactly the nicest person in the world, and occasionally the old Sam's special skills in catty put-downs emerge from the recesses of her mind.

Sam not only has to find out who she was, she has to decide if she wants to be it again or start afresh. And to take out the Treadstone project.

Whoops. Didn't mean that last bit. Sorry.

Continue reading "Review: Samantha Who? 1.1"

October 17, 2007

Third-episode verdict: Aliens in America

Posted on October 17, 2007 | Post a comment |

The Carusometer for Aliens in America1-Caruso-Free

For me, Aliens in America has been the surprise show of this year's Fall season. A programme about a Pakistani exchange student who comes to middle America and encounters prejudice and ignorance wherever he goes? Sounds… great, huh?

However, it's actually been the funniest new comedy of the season so far, and surprisingly touching as well. Much of the comedy stems from Raja's failure to understand the local townspeople's War on Terror-induced fear of him. But it's also his friendship with Justin, the host family's son, and the meaner rules of American High School culture that provide the laughs. Raja can't really get to grips with lying, holding back on declaring his love for his friend in case people think him gay and all the other lessons Justin's already learnt the hard way at High School.

Although we haven't quite re-attained the highs of the first episode, the second and third episodes have been almost as funny and often cut quite near the knuckle, with the third episode in particular raising a few eyebrows with its daring, post-9/11. While Raja is really a little too good to be true, achieving near-Angelic status in his attitudes and behaviour, he's still sufficiently complex to avoid becoming a simple liberal counter-stereotype.

If you fancy a laugh and don't mind watching a show that's mostly about teenagers, I heartily recommend Aliens in America.

The Medium is Not Enough scored a 1 or “Caruso free” rating on The Carusometer. A “Caruso free” rating corresponds to a show that David Caruso might accidentally get sent a script for. After failing to persuade the producers that his acting talents are more than capable of convincing people that he's a 16-year-old Pakistani student, he declares the show un-American and tries to have it banned. The notoriety only makes the show's ratings increase, something that happens even more when he tries to randomly search the cast for 'weapons-grade fertilizer' as they go home each evening.

October 15, 2007

Review: Women's Murder Club

Posted on October 15, 2007 | 8 comments |

Women's Murder Club

In the US:
Fridays, 9/8c, ABC

In the UK: Not yet acquired. Any bets on Living?

“Ah, women,” the senior network executive thought to himself. “So beautiful, yet their heads are filled with thoughts of pink things and butterflies. Yet they are an important demographic since so few of them have jobs, and therefore spend their time in front of the television all day.”

He smiled benevolently at the young male network executives gathered around him at his Private Men's Club For Private Men. They were there to learn the important arts of programme development.

Leaning forward, he began to impart his wisdom. “Fortunately, there is a simple Formula for creating a television programme that all women everywhere will want to watch. Do not deviate from it. Do not change it. It must be the same. If we can fill an entire network like Oxygen full of shows made to this single recipe, we can do the same with ABC. The Formula is strong.”

He looked from eager face to eager face. “Take a genre, any genre. Women love crime, so that's always good. Take a group of friends, all of them excellent at their jobs, yet somehow not properly respected in their workplace by their male superiors and colleagues. Give them relationship issues then insist that they discuss their relationships at all times, even when working, to the extent they'd probably get fired in the real world. Women like the idea of female solidarity. They can identify with women who are practically perfect in every way, yet have problems just like you and…” He paused and smiled, “…well, not like me.”

Sycophantic laughter echoed round the room, opening up holes in the cloud of cigar smoke that surrounded them all.

“Then,” he said pointing dramatically and paused yet again for effect. “Make them work so hard that soon, all the men will realise their mistakes and learn to love them for the wonderful, beautiful, strong women that they are. Women love that rubbish.”

He reclined into his chinchilla skin armchair. His computer had already generated the next show to use the formula: Women's Murder Club. It was pure genius. Just like the last 70 shows to use the Formula.

Continue reading "Review: Women's Murder Club"

Third-episode verdict: Moonlight

Posted on October 15, 2007 | Post a comment |

Sophia Myles might not be coming home just yet. Despite an exceedingly poor first episode, Moonlight has been steadily improving over the last few episodes and its ratings have been holding up, too. There are a few touches of originality creeping in and the format is still undergoing plenty of mutations.

So The Carusometer and I are holding off until the fifth episode for now. We'll let you know the final verdict in a fortnight.

Read other posts about:

October 13, 2007

Third-episode verdict: Dirty Sexy Money

Posted on October 13, 2007 | 10 comments |

The Carusometer for Dirty Sexy Money2-Partial-Caruso

Does a show that aspires to be intelligent need to have a message? Does the author/auteur behind it need to tell us something about life, the universe and everything and does that need to be something we probably wouldn't have worked out for ourselves?

There's a considerable camp that thinks the answer to both questions is 'yes'. Is it true though? Can't we just enjoy a show without being told something? If the audience is looking for intelligent drama and therefore likely to be composed of intelligent people, is there likely to be a message that an intelligent drama could bring to the audience that it doesn't know already?

It's a vexing issue, probably best solved by a man of letters such as Christopher Hitchens, rather than me, someone who's watched too much television for his own good and has probably got brain rot by now. I can tell which cycle of America's Next Top Model is on Living TV, simply through the set decoration and end theme music of the episode. Mr Hitchens I am not.

I think it's also fair to say that the producers of Dirty Sexy Money are not peers of Christopher Hitchens either, because they're not sure of the answers. They're fudging the issue. They want to imply there's a message to the show. Maybe it's that rich people are complicated and weird and different and spoilt. Maybe it's that they're just like you and me. Maybe it's learn to accept yourself and others' eccentricities if you want to achieve nirvana.

Whether they're pointing they're finger like gawpers at a trust fund freak show or simply Buddhist playwrights in disguise, the producers are hoping that by sticking with some of the conventions of intelligent drama and hoping we'll stick around while they try to work out their message or lack thereof, that they will be producing an intelligent drama that smart, advertiser-friendly, affluent people want to watch. As Hannibal Lecktor used to say in Manhunter, if one does as God does enough times, one will become as God is - that is, if you act like you're producing an intelligent drama for long enough, you will actually end up producing an intelligent drama. Of course, good old Hannibal was talking about killing people because God clearly enjoys doing it so much Himself, but the principle applies.

Whether Dirty Sexy Money is actually an intelligent drama or not is unclear. It's certainly not stupid. It has a good cast, with Donald Sutherland particularly fine as you'd expect, BrianPeter Krause doing a good job of holding everything together, and William Baldwin now scaring me with how similar he is to his brother Alec when playing rich people. It has relatively interesting plots, even if does seem like each episode is like a serialised version of Treasure Hunt, with BrianPeter Krause getting a new clue at the end that takes him off on another exploration of his dad's possible murder the following week. It's also quite funny, with good dialogue and the occasional twist of farce.

But I'm just not sure if there's much point to it. None of the characters are ones you can really identify with, with the possible exception of Krause's. They're not really representative of real rich people or in fact any other human beings on this planet, as far as I can work out. And as of yet, there's no real exploration of these fake people anyway: we're just supposed to marvel at their antics, rather than find out what truly makes them tick.

It's like a comedy-drama sudoku, a puzzle that needs to be solved for no real reason other than it passes the time. It's a well-executed puzzle, but it doesn't really grab me emotionally. I'm probably going to carry on watching for a while, since I like BrianPeter Krause and I like sudokus, but I could quite easily drop it from schedules without missing it, I suspect.

So it turns out there needs to be a point to drama, but only as long as it's because you don't care enough about the characters to watch because of them. Blimey. I am Christopher Hitchens after all. Where's the gin?

The Medium is Not Enough declares Dirty Sexy Money a two or “Partial Caruso” on The Carusometer quality scale. A Partial Caruso corresponds to “a show with two walk-on cameos by David Caruso as a family lawyer. However, when faced with a cast that includes transgender prostitutes, adulterers and professional divorcees, he will storm off, citing 'creative differences' and claiming that he 'thought ”family lawyer“ meant something else'.”

October 11, 2007

Third-episode verdict: Cavemen

Posted on October 11, 2007 | 3 comments |

The Carusometer for Cavemen4-Major-Caruso

It's a special, custom Carusometer for Cavemen, thanks to ABC's somewhat interesting choice of shooting a pilot, deciding they didn't like it that much and getting a load of other episodes shot to precede it. The pilot's airing fifth, but since I've now seen three episodes with The Carusometer, I'm going to pass a third-episode verdict. This way, I'm not going to have to watch any more episodes.

The show's simply not that funny. It occasionally has a few moments of intelligence, when it exposes stereotypes and racist behaviour through people's attitudes to the cavemen - as well as the cavemen's own attitudes. The characters are affable enough. But for the most part, it just doesn't make you laugh. It's just people chiselling away the word “black” in the scripts, replacing it with “cavemen”, and hoping we laugh at the cleverness of it all - and not notice that there aren't any actors from ethnic minorities playing any significant parts, despite the show being about racism.

And yes, it's another show about slackers. Why this sudden craze in programming, I wonder? And will anyone find a decent way of making it funny?

The Medium is Not Enough hereby declares Cavemen is a 4 or “Major Caruso” on The Carusometer quality scale. A Major Caruso corresponds to “a show that David Caruso might exec produce or star in after seeing an advert on television featuring cavemen. However, after deciding that cavemen are too dirty and too likely to vote Democrat, he changes the format of the show to be about a hard-working Polish actor, played by himself, who fights the terrible prejudice that exists in society towards people with red hair and who can't act.”

1 2 3 4 5

Featured Articles

Rupert Penry-Jones tells all

Gone but not Forgotten