Archive | Featured articles

Some of the best articles on the blog. Typically, these have a picture. It's a low entrance requirement, I know.

May 25, 2016

Preview: Preacher 1x1-1x3 (US: AMC; UK: Amazon Prime)

Posted on May 25, 2016 | Post a comment | Bookmark and Share


In the US: Sundays, 9pm (8c), AMC
In the UK: Episodes available on Amazon Prime the day after US airing

Maybe I just found Garth Ennis at the wrong time. Hellblazer had been one of my favourite comics at university, thanks to Jamie Delano's unique blend of horror, politics and a UK setting. When he left the title, I expected more of the same. Instead, I got Garth Ennis.

For many, Ennis was the best writer of John Constantine, combining horror with a knowing playfulness that undercut the action. For me, I was losing amoral tussles with hunger demons as a metaphor for Western consumption and Ethiopia in favour of tricks on the Devil involving transmuted holy water. Horses for courses, but Ennis was definitely not my 3.15 from Aintree.

That's probably why I never read Preacher, Ennis' magnum opus. Even to tell you what it was about, I'd have to look at Wikipedia. To a lot of comics fans, that's tantamount to not being able to explain the plot of Hamlet, but I don't care - Garth Ennis stole my student Constantine, wah, wah, it's not fair.

So is AMC's Preacherwritten and exec-produced by (of all people) Seth Rogen and his childhood pal Evan Goldberg, a faithful adaptation of this esteemed comic? Don't know and don't care, either. Ennis - pphhtt. Wah.

What I can tell you is that it stars Dominic Cooper (Captain America, Fleming) as the improbably named Texan, Jessie Custer, a bad-as-they-come criminal who returns to become the preacher in his home town when his father dies. Trouble is he's a very bad preacher who's not really convinced there is a God. Then one day, just as he's planning to give it all up and return to his bad, bad ways, he asks one last time for a sign from God of His existence… and, surprisingly, he receives it. And now, whenever he tells someone to do something, they do it - often more literally than Jessie intended. It's almost like the Preacher now speaks the very word of God.

And that's basically episode one, which you might have already seen. I've left out Tulip (Ruth Negga from Marvel's Agents of SHIELD), Jessie's former partner-in-crime, who's got 'one last job for him' and isn't going to take no for an answer. I've also left out Cassidy (Joseph Gilgun from This is England and Misfits), the century-old Irish vampire who's being chased by a group of religious fanatics. 

We can talk about them and the next two episodes after the jump.

Continue reading "Preview: Preacher 1x1-1x3 (US: AMC; UK: Amazon Prime)"

Read other posts about:

May 12, 2016

Review: Raising Expectations 1x1 (Canada: Family)

Posted on May 12, 2016 | Post a comment | Bookmark and Share

Raising Expectations

In Canada: Sundays, 7:30pm ET/PT, Family

Some shows just invite you to slate them, simply by their names. Remember Bonekickers? Even if it hadn't been absolutely dreadful in and of itself, there was that name, begging for me to hate the show.

Raising Expectations isn't in Bonekickers' league, in that sense, but it's definitely an invitation to pre-emptively reply "Yes, but you're still absolute sh*te. Who told you you were above average?" After all, most Canadian comedies are dreadful. There's about one good one a decade.

Yet here's one that stars, wait for it, not just Jason Priestley from Beverly Hills 90210 and Tru Calling but also Molly Ringwald. Yes, Molly Pretty in Pink Ringwald.

We're talkin' 'bout my generation here - raising expectations indeed. 

So I was prepared to give Raising Expectations the benefit of the doubt, despite airing on Canada's Family channel and having the following plot:

The Wayneys are an amazing family. They’re good looking, smart, talented, athletic, and popular. Paige Wayney is a best-selling author, and her husband Wayne is an architect. They have worked hard at raising their five children to be “multi-exceptional”, and they succeeded… four times. Adam is an honours students and football quarterback. Bentley is a brilliant poet and cellist. Conner is a gifted dancer and actress. Derek is a master of gadgets. Their youngest son, Emmett, is a work in progress. Emmett may not be the most academic, athletic, or artistic of the Wayneys, but he makes up for that with his “street smarts”.

If I could punch a plot, I would. But I really wanted to like it, all the same.

Unfortunately, the show isn't funny. There's a mild titter every so often and the show saves its sole actual laugh for literally the final line of dialogue, but the humour's generally of the order of background radiation, rather than Silicon Valley

In part, that's because it's Canadian intended for a family/young audience, and the show isn't pushing any boundaries. It's not even aware there are boundaries to be pushed, it's so young and innocent. It's coming to this humour thing as though its audience is as equally young and innocent that they've never heard any jokes before and so all the old ones can still be used. You might as well be watching early 90s Canadian-British co-production Spatz for all the differences: 

Perhaps that's a little unfair, since so much of this first episode is as down with modern kids' social media obsession as The CW's Containment, with Ringwald's online lecture garnering troll comments that not only are mean about Ringwald, but expose Priestley as having lied to her on one of their first dates. The children then use their 'unique, character-defining, all other characteristics-excluding' skillsets to organise a SWATing (well, pizza- and poo-ing) the trolls in revenge, while Priestley has to re-retroactively disprove the lie by climbing up a rope with an egg in his pocket (don't ask).

It's a bit hard to like any of the kids, though. Apart from the odd choice of three sons, one daughter, all with stereotypical interests and abilities, it's hard not to look at both Priestley and Ringwald and think "These look like normal people" and then to look at the kids and think, "These look like they're made of plastic." Times have changed and standards of on-screen pulchritude have unfortunately increased, but I was genuinely surprised when any of them managed to have a facial expression.

If you've got to watch something with your kids, Priestley and Ringwald are a sufficient draw in themselves - and, in fact, toghether - that you could probably make your way through an episode or two without your brain revolting.

Otherwise, stear clear of Raising Expectations and always rememberCaroline laughs and it's raining all day, she loves to be one of the girls, she lives in the place in the side of our lives, where nothing is ever put straight. She turns herself round and she smiles and she says, "This is it that's the end of the joke," and loses herself in her dreaming and sleep, and her lovers walk through in their coaches.


April 21, 2016

Review: Containment 1x1 (US: The CW; UK: E4)

Posted on April 21, 2016 | Post a comment | Bookmark and Share

The CW's Containment

In the US: Tuesdays, 9/8c, The CW
In the UK: Acquired by E4 for Summer airing

Normally, the way this blog works is that I scour the world looking for TV shows that you all might want to watch (or avoid) and review them. Then, at some indeterminate point in the future, maybe a few months later, maybe not at all, eventually they'll arrive on some UK TV channel or Internet service and, maybe you'll look back and read what I said about them, to see if they're worth watching (or avoiding).

As you can imagine, with that kind of top editorial USP and universal appeal, TMINE has become one of the top traffic destinations on the Internet, as well as a veritable ad magnet, and I've become famous. Normal people can hardly spend a day without mentioning how much they like TMINE in regular conversation down the pub, launderette or wherever. Why just today, I was talking to someone I've worked with for about four years about top US TV shows and I mentioned that I always watched the first three episodes of any TV show to see whether it's good or bad.

"Do you?" she said, obviously bewildered why anyone would do that. 

That's how famous the Carusometer and Barrometer have made me.

Anyway, with Containment, most of you will probably be able to turn the tables on me. The CW's latest show - its third and final new one this year - sees the outbreak of a lethal new disease in Atlanta that can be communicated by bodily fluids or contact. So quickly does it spread, the government decides that everyone walking four to six feet apart from one another isn't enough and it needs to quarantine the outbreak, so sticks a great big fence round it.

Some people, most of them young and pretty, get stuck on the outside; some people, most of them young and pretty, get stuck on the inside - usually, relationship partners get stuck on the opposite sides of the fence (what are the odds of that?). Is that going to be enough to stop the virus? Will everyone be reunited after a couple of days when the fence comes down, as the government promises? And just how many relationships will get started or ended by the quarantine?

Well, if the flashforward to Day 3 at the start and end of the first episode is anything to go by, it'll be just three small notches down the Bad Things scale from 'Zombie Apocalypse' by that point.

So why will you be able to turn the tables on me? Well, what if I give you the hint that everyone keeps talking about a 'cordon sanitaire' and 'inside the cordon'?

Yes, that's right. It's an adaptation of Belgian drama Cordon, which you all probably watched on BBC Four last year:

I didn't. I'd tried Salamander. That was the best Belgium had to offer. It was rubbishCordon was second choice, so why bother with that, hey?

So was it good then? Does it end well? I've read Wiki about it now, and this seems pretty close to it so far, which means you probably know better than I do whether Containment is going to be good, as I've only seen the first episode.

Anyway, this is semi-pants, semi-good, and I say this as someone with a repeatedly self-professed love for the 'killer virus' genre. Despite largely having a cast of Brits, Australians and Canadians all struggling to survive, it's basically a CW/American-isation of a more adult Euro-thriller.

David Gyasi (Apparitions, Cloud Atlas, Interstellar) is the noble cop struggling to keep his community and his relationship together, while he tries to work out the true agenda of the ambivalent and strangely stern government doctor running things, Claudia Black (Stargate, Farscape); Chris Wood (The Vampire Diaries) is his pal cop, oddly resentful he's trapped inside the hot zone with cute single parent teacher Kristen Gutoskie (Beaver Falls, Republic of Doyle); Hanna Mangan Lawrence (Spartacus) is the pregnant teenager on the run who's now trapped in the city; and George Young (The Brian Jackson Show) is the plucky Brit doctor trying to come up with a cure.

The show is often at pains to do the least interesting, most soapiest thing possible, cutting away as soon as "the science part" begins to have someone sulking like a teenager who's not allowed to play on the XBox again until they've done their homework because killer viruses are, like, just so unfair, dad. Vectors and proteins aren't anywhere near as interesting as wondering how this 100% fatal killer virus outbreak makes you feel about your relationship, is it, not when those relationships are so 100% completely predictable?

There is a slightly offensive part (imported and translated into 'merican from Cordon's Afghan) that has the killer virus, which turns out to have been weaponised, being brought into the US by a Syrian refugee. From both Wiki and the show's own production notes, which reveal that journalist Trevor St John (One Life To Live) is going to pop up in later episodes, suspicious of the government's story, it seems this is a bit of a ruse, so I'm not going to get too het up about it, but it's notable that the muslim family are the first ones under suspicion and carted off to quarantine.

But those problems aside, it's not as much of a clunker as it could have been, certainly not compared to Between, the almost platonic CW ideal of Containment. It's a bit more gruesome and death-filled than you might expect; it is actually filmed in Atlanta and while it's not quite 54% black and no one's doing a Georgia accent, the cast is reasonably diverse; there is some science in there; some of the dialogue is occasionally pretty good; and there's the occasional scene that touches on the frightening. I'm sure the conspiracy theory is going to turn out to be insanely ridiculous, but we've not had to endure that yet, and it all seems moderately enticing at the moment.

If there's nothing better on and you've not seen Cordon, give Containment a go to see if it's to your liking - it's a 'limited series' so hopefully won't take up too much of your life if you decide to stick with it, too. But Containment is a low-rent US adaptation of a low-rent Belgian TV show in the scheme things, so don't have great expectations going in - especially not if you already know how the original ends.

  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402  

Featured Articles

The Bold Type

Journalism for people who can't read more than a Tweet