Archive | Featured articles

Some of the best articles on the blog. Typically, these have a picture. It's a low entrance requirement, I know.


November 1, 2016

Review: Pure Genius 1x1 (US: CBS; UK: Universal)

Posted on November 1, 2016 | Post a comment | Bookmark and Share

Pure Genius

In the US: Thursdays, 10/9c, CBS 
In the UK: Wednesdays, 9pm, Universal. Starts 16th November

Healthcare research is an important topic. It is literally life-saving - or life-destroying if done wrong. It's no surprise that billions of dollars are spent around the world to develop novel techniques and medicines, but always subject to strict ethical controls and procedures to ensure as few problems occur as possible.

Of course, if you're from a completely different industry sector, such as computing, this speed of innovation can seem problematic, and Pure Genius gives us the somewhat odd scenario of a Silicon Valley tech genius setting up his own hospital, packed full of top doctors, so they can try out cutting edge procedures - all with the bare minimum of ethical oversight. Of course, the rules are there for a reason, and the entire first episode is almost a cautionary tale of why those rules are there. Fancy giving someone an experimental ingestible piece of technology without a control group and while she's pregnant? Let's just see what happens when that goes wrong then…

Indeed, the show feels like someone recently went to a blue sky healthcare tech show, saw all manner of whizzy gadgets being simulated and tried to work out a TV show where all these things could be demonstrated in the (more or less) here and now, no matter how impossible it would be in practice unless every patient were a billionaire, too.

There's certainly very little attention paid to any of the characters. We have a plethora of female doctors famous from other TV shows, including Royal Pains' Reshma Shetty and House's Odette Anable, picked because presumably it's easier for us to assume they're the same characters as before than to actually give them lives, proper histories, or relationships. Dermot Mulroney (Crisis) gets most of the attention, as a genius surgeon wondering if he should take a job in the hospital and then being persuaded by a 3D printer that prints out plastic hearts he can practise surgery on before dealing with the real thing - you can buy them down the shops now, Dermot, so don't be so hasty.

But even Dermot is there just to show off the whizzy things. Likewise Augustus Prew (The Borgias), the show's surprisingly stupid genius, who'll Google something on the Internet that sounds like an epic white elephant (brain to brain communication technology) and buy the entire company for millions. He may be a bit poorly himself and have built the hospital largely to fund research that will save himself, but he'd really be more at home at Comdex 2016 on stage demonstrating a smartphone than talking to another human being about the prognosis following a radical but failed new course of treatment, which is where he starts to get a bit sad. Maybe you should have read up about double-blind treatments first, Augustus, hey?

By the end of the first episode, I'm surprised the whole bunch of them haven't been sued and the hospital shut down due to serious malpractice, but given the levels of reality-warping needed for some of the things that take place to be realistic, I wouldn't be surprised if the FDA is now a bowl of petunias and a very surprised sperm whale. 

Pure Genius? Pure nonsense more like it.

Read other posts about:

November 1, 2016

Review: The Great Indoors 1x1 (US: CBS; UK: ITV2)

Posted on November 1, 2016 | Post a comment | Bookmark and Share

The Great Indoors

In the US: Thursdays, 8.30/7.30c, CBS
In the UK: Acquired by ITV2

For those not in the know, CBS is a channel largely watched by older folk. The home of numerous procedurals and family sitcoms, it does, however, try to attract a younger audience from time to time, often with comedies such as The Big Bang Theory. And The Great Indoors is an interesting example of a comedy pitched at both the young and old - interesting in the sense that you can probably tell whether you're young or old based on which characters you most empathise with.

Community's Joel McHale (45) is a craggy magazine journalist, used to filing his copy from out in the field following close encounters with mountains, bears, Indian yogis and death. He's summoned back to the office by proprietor Stephen Fry - yes, STEPHEN FRY (59) - where in common with untold numbers of other journalists around the world, he's told the print version of the magazine is being shut but it'll continue online. The slight hitch is that he'll be office-bound and working with Christopher Mintz-Plasse (27), Shaun Brown (29) and Christine Ko (don't ask) - the millennials that run the digital division of the company and whose idea of an experience is watching a YouTube video of an experience. Compounding the discomfort caused by his complete lack of experiental overlap with these mere foetuses is the fact that he'll be working for Fry's daughter, Susannah Fielding (31) (I Want My Wife Back, The C-Word), whom he probably slept with relatively recently, despite there being a slightly icky age gap.

Now, given it's CBS - the home of cheap laughs at other people's expenses, as well as of old people - you'd be forgiven for expecting The Great Indoors to be an excuse for the network to marry two disparate but related strands of humour: older, wiser people laughing at callow youth; and rugged manly types laughing at nerds. You'd also be forgiven for thinking that the show would know next to nothing about journalism or magazines, and that it would have the IQ and literacy of an angry letter to a local newspaper.

But, despite the trailer below suggesting just that, surprisingly The Great Indoors is more of a meeting of minds. While most laughs are at millennials' behaviour, ranging from the speed at which they take offence at things through to their need to selfie their every waking moment, this is a meeting of minds in which McHale learns to be a better person and to understand online while the millennials learn how to put their smartphones down for a moment or two. Fry isn't the usual stereotypical Englishman and his dialogue is often erudite and subversive. There's even a suggestion that there has been some actual research done into magazine journalism, with job titles such as 'digital curator' and listicles about surviving the Zombie Apocalypse hinting that a day or two may have been spent at Buzzfeed at some point.

Of course, the show is creating a false dichotomy between the digeratti and the digital illiterate: I started working on newspaper web sites back in 1995 and any journalist my - and McHale's - age will have been well acquainted with online publishing for years, if not decades. I've also seen that video featuring the bears in the swimming pool, too, and I have four Twitter accounts, a LinkedIn account and a Facebook account. Millennials working in journalism can still talk to sources and go outdoors; 40-somethings aren't the same as 60-somethings. But, hey, it's a multi-camera sitcom - you might as well critique mistakes in the maths in Big Bang Theory.

On the plus side, the pilot episode also features Stephen Fry nursing a bear cub and both McHale and Fry deliver the goods; on the minus side, the live studio audience seems to make Fielding think she's in a pantomime and the millennials don't really work as individual characters, rather than personifications of ideas of millennials.

If you like Fry and McHale, The Great Indoors might not wow you, but you certainly won't come out of it feeling like you've been robbed of a great comedic opportunity. If you're a millennial, you might not see yourself in the show, but what are you doing watching TV rather than Snapchats anyway?

Read other posts about:

October 31, 2016

Review: Chance 1x1-1x3 (US: Hulu)

Posted on October 31, 2016 | Post a comment | Bookmark and Share

Chance

In the US: Wednesdays, Hulu

For most people in the UK, Hugh Laurie is Hugh Laurie. He may have played Gregory House in House for umpteen seasons, but he's also the guy from Blackadder, Bertie Wooster in Jeeves and Wooster, and Stephen Fry's comedy writing partner for most of the 80s and early 90s.

For most Americans, though, he's House. He is the grumpy, misanthropic, genius American doctor from House. End of. So you can kind of understand why Laurie would take on a two-season role as an eponymous doctor again, if only to cleanse American viewers' memories by playing something similar, but crucially different in one big regard: he's nice.

Based on the novel by Ken Humm (John from Cincinnati), Chance sees Laurie playing a consultant psychologist, who tries to sort out treatment for people who have neurological problems. When Gretchen Mol (Life on Mars) is referred to him with disassociative personality disorder, which she says started after her cop husband Paul Adelstein (Prison Break) began to abuse her, he tries to help her but soon the husband is coming after him.

Meanwhile, the non-confrontational Laurie is in the middle of a no-fault divorce from his wife Diane Farr (Numb3rs) and needs money. When he takes his antique desk to Clarke Peters (The Wire) to be sold, Peters tells him he could get nearly twice as much money if it still had the metalwork on it. Fortunately, Ethan Suplee (My Name is Earl) works for him and could add the missing metalwork if Laurie doesn't mind a little deception. In turn, Suplee doesn't mind a little bit of ultra-violence and is potentially willing to help Laurie out with his other problem…

I'll play a little game now. I'll list a few things and you have to say at which word you realised what the show's biggest influence is.

San Francisco. Psychiatry. Blonde. Femme fatale. Different personalities. Hitchcockian strings.

Well, if you haven't got it already, the answer's Vertigo, one of Alfred Hitchock's finest, in which Jimmy Stewart falls for Kim Novak who plays two women who turn out to be just the one. Certainly, Chance has huge ladels of both Vertigo and film noir spread all over it. There's also lashings of Woody Allen's Crimes and Misdemeanours, with Suplee and Peters leading the normally ethical Laurie towards a life of escalating moral infractions towards possibly even murder.

But Chance is certainly a lot more than that and knows that you know what its references are. Certainly, Laurie doesn't do anything massively stupid, instead doing all manner of smart, prudent things rather than leaping in at the deep end. There's also a certain House of Cards - David Mamet's, that is - quality to it all which the show is also keen to highlight. Is maths tutor Mol really disassociative or is she faking it? Is Adelstein really doing all the things that he seems to be doing or is the surprisingly bright Suplee actually doing it all to lure Laurie into a huge con? Could they even all be in league with one another?

Chance wants you to be wondering all of these things, which is why, despite its depressing qualities, it's also compelling, very tense and claustrophobic (rather than vertiginous). The double meaning in the title, which becomes hugely important in the second episode, makes you wonder exactly how much of what's going on is genuine coincidence and what's not - or even if Laurie's character is facing a Sixth Sense discovery that he's had a brain injury himself. Even if you're not exactly sure what the trap is, you can feel the jaws slowly closing around Laurie, who's a good guy who wants to do the right thing.

It's a good, smart, well-paced thriller that's definitely worth a try.

Barrometer rating: 2
Would it be better with a female lead? No
TMINE's prediction: Commissioned for two seasons

Read other posts about: , , , ,

  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402  

Featured Articles

The Bold Type

Journalism for people who can't read more than a Tweet