Categorised | US TV 2016

Tags |

Third-episode verdict: The Great Indoors (US: CBS; UK: ITV2)

Posted on November 14, 2016 | Post a comment | Bookmark and Share

BarrometerTheGreatIndoors.jpgA Barrometer rating of 3

In the US: Thursdays, 8.30/7.30c, CBS
In the UK: Acquired by ITV2

The worst that can truly be said about The Great Indoors - in which rugged manly outdoor activities journalist Joel McHale (Community) is summoned back to an office job by boss Stephen Fry when his magazine goes online-only, forcing him to have to work with a bunch of digital-literate millennials - is that it's a CBS multi-camera sitcom. And not in a bad way.

When I saw the trailer and before I watched the first episode, I assumed I was going to have to condemn the show in the strongest possible terms for all the usual reasons reserved for CBS multi-camera sitcoms.

But, actually, it's all right. Not totally hysterical, not having the cutting edge insight into its subject matter of Veep, not possessed of well drawn out characters, for sure. But it's still more like a lighter, nicer version of The Big Bang Theory than a nastier, more predictable version of Mike and Molly. It's a studio comedy with an audience that's designed to make you laugh.

Three episodes into the show and although it's clear that its heart is really with McHale and his desperate attempt to de-nerd an entire generation, it's also clear that times have changed and there ain't no going back - McHale has to learn from his juniors, too.

Episode two focused on the Brave New World of dating apps, and while McHale's ability to randomly speak with strangers in real-life is something of an asset that he can teach the youngsters, it's also clear it's now perceived as also a bit creepy. Most of the episode therefore dedicated to teaching him how to navigate this new, more formal aspect of dating life. 

Meanwhile, episode three is a lecture in urban apartment-hunting, with McHale discovering that for millennials, there's a clear choice between having money to live off and having a decent place to live in - you can't have both.

The show also manages to avoid turning everyone's favourite uncle, Stephen Fry, into yet another quaint Englishman. Here, he's erudite, funny, travelled and a man's man, happier drinking whisky with McHale and trading war stories, than bedding down with the millennials in their indoor tents. 

Where the show doesn't quite gel - at least, not yet - is Susannah Fielding, who plays Fry's daughter/McHale's one-time girlfriend. While she's clearly supposed to be something of a translator, able to speak both millennial and middle-aged, she's not well served by the scripts and her delivery is reminiscent of 'Pantomime Dame 3' from last year's Jack and the Beanstalk. 

Similarly, the millennials themselves are more ideas of millennials than developed characters in their own rights - this one's sexually fluid, this one's deadpan and inexpressive, this one's computer-literate and so on. While each of those traits is more nuanced than you'd expect, there's still no real background for any of them, no stories that are really about them rather than McHale.

But we're at episode three of a multi-camera sitcom that could be on for the next decade, given it's CBS. There will be time for The Great Indoors. Thankfully, it does at least have a good foundation to start with.

Rating: 3
Would it be better with a female lead? Different, not better
TMINE's prediction: Could last a good few seasons, given 2 Broke Girls is still on

Related entries

  • November 14, 2016: What have you been watching? Including Frontier, People of Earth, Stan Against Evil and Ghostbusters
    The TV I watched in the week ending Monday 14th November 2016
  • November 28, 2016: What have you been watching? Including Goliath, Finding Dory, Chance and Frequency
    The TV I watched in the week ending Monday 28th November 2016
  • November 21, 2016: What have you been watching? Including The Grand Tour, Hypernormalisation, Doctor Doctor and Travelers
    The TV I watched in the week ending Monday 21st November 2016
  • December 5, 2016: What have you been watching? Including פאודה (Fauda), Incorporated
    The TV I watched in the week ending Monday 5th December 2016
  • December 12, 2016: What have you been watching? Including Jason Bourne, Dirk Gently's Holistic Detective Agency and Ash vs Evil Dead
    The TV I watched in the week ending Monday 12th December 2016
  • December 19, 2016: What have you been watching? Including Rogue One, Nobel, The OA and Chance
    The TV I watched in the week ending Monday 19th December 2016
  • December 16, 2016: When's that show you mentioned starting again, TMINE? Including Search Party, The Whispers, Legion and The Great Indoors
    What acquisition premiere dates have been announced in the week ending Friday 16th December 2016
  • January 23, 2017: What have you been watching? Including The Magnificent Seven, Shooter, Lucifer and The Man in the High Castle
    The TV I watched in the week ending Monday 23rd January 2017
  • January 16, 2017: What have you been watching? Including Workin' Moms, Sherlock and The Great Indoors
    The TV I watched in the week ending Monday 16th January 2017
  • February 27, 2017: What have you been watching? Including Doubt, Patriot, Training Day and Billions
    Reviews of 13/2/17-27/2/17's episodes of 24: Legacy, Cardinal, DC's Legends of Tomorrow, The Flash, Fortitude, The Great Indoors, Lethal Weapon, The Magicians, Man Seeking Woman, Powerless, Son of Zorn, Timeless, Billions, Doubt, Patriot and Training Day
  • February 13, 2017: What have you been watching? Including Fortitude, The Great Indoors, The Magicians, Powerless and Son of Zorn
    Reviews of 7/2/17-13/2/17's episodes of DC's Legends of Tomorrow, The Flash, Fortitude, The Great Indoors, Lethal Weapon, The Magicians, Man Seeking Woman, Powerless, Son of Zorn, and Timeless

Read other posts about:

Allowable comments

You can leave just about any kind of comment you like. You can argue, suggest I am (or anyone else is) wrong, leaving general messages of love – anything. However, you absolutely can't leave messages that attack other commenters (or me), are simple variations of "your review sucks" or that are misogynistic, racist, homophobic, etc: your comment will either be edited or deleted and you'll be barred from leaving any further comments. We want to keep it civil here.

Spoilers

You can hide a spoiler by putting <spoiler> before it and </spoiler> after it. Hover over a spoiler to reveal it!

Featured Articles

Famous In Love

A slap in the face to aspiring actresses