Categorised | US TV

Tags | None

Third-episode verdict: Eyewitness (US: USA)

Posted on November 9, 2016 | Post a comment | Bookmark and Share

BarrometerEyeWitness.jpgA Barrometer rating of 3

In the US: Sundays, 10/9c, USA

On the face of it, Eyewitness isn't a hard show to understand. An adaptation of NRK Norway's Øyevitne (Eyewitness), it sees two teenage boys witness a horrible murder of a gang of criminals out in rural New York state. The killer gets away but knows someone witnessed his crime. However, the two boys would rather no one know what they saw or that they were even together, so don't tell anyone.

And that's basically the plot for the first three episodes. It's complicated somewhat at the end of episode two by the revelation that the murderer is actually (spoiler alert) the new local head of the FBI and that the foster mother of one of the boys is the local sheriff. It's also diluted by a side-plot about the fact the two boys are gay, but only one of them has really come to terms with this. But that's more or less the show.

Which is what's hard to understand. So used am I to big twists, plots within plots, hugely serial storylines involving large ensemble casts that something so ordinary, so regular, so meat and potatoes is hard to fathom. What's the selling point? What's the big reason for watching? I can't see it.

Sure, it's a bit edgy, with some nice direction by Twilight's Catherine Harwicke. The evil, unstoppable, Terminator-like bad guy in a position of authority from whom the boys are trying to escape is also a hebephile - because he wasn't evil enough - which is unusual. There's a LGBT storyline that for a change is not about pretty lesbians but pretty boys, which is also unusual. There's an obvious The Killing vibe to the whole piece, with just a touch of No Country For Old Men, with the community grieving and the sheriff in particular struggling to cope while El Terminator cuts a swathe through the population of local teenagers with ruthless efficiency. There's also a bit of moral compromise, with a local FBI agent having to cover up her sister's involvement in the case.

And all of this would work very nicely with a Norwegian accent and two hours of daylight, but in a sunnier, more hopeful American context, everything feels very vanilla and apple pie rather than claustrophobic and exposing of the horror deep in the core of the human spirit. It's not bad, but it's also not a huge step above the average episode of Law & Order.

I might keep watching for the prettiness of the direction, but Eyewitness is probably a show that worked a whole lot better as Øyevitne than as Eyewitness.

Barrometer rating: 3
Would it work better with a female lead? N/A
TMINE's prediction: It's an anthology show, so everything changes at the end of the season, so it might get a second chance if it's lucky.

Related entries

  • November 14, 2016: What have you been watching? Including Frontier, People of Earth, Stan Against Evil and Ghostbusters
    The TV I watched in the week ending Monday 14th November 2016

Allowable comments

You can leave just about any kind of comment you like. You can argue, suggest I am (or anyone else is) wrong, leaving general messages of love – anything. However, you absolutely can't leave messages that attack other commenters (or me), are simple variations of "your review sucks" or that are misogynistic, racist, homophobic, etc: your comment will either be edited or deleted and you'll be barred from leaving any further comments. We want to keep it civil here.

Spoilers

You can hide a spoiler by putting <spoiler> before it and </spoiler> after it. Hover over a spoiler to reveal it!

Featured Articles

Marvel's Iron Fist

Season two of Daredevil but done right