Categorised | US TV 2016

Tags |

Third-episode verdict: Designated Survivor (US: ABC; UK: Netflix)

Posted on October 6, 2016 | Post a comment | Bookmark and Share

BarrometerDesignatedSurvivor.jpgA Barrometer rating of 3

In the US: Wednesdays, 10/9c, ABC
In the UKNetflix. New episode every Thursday

Hindsight is a beautiful thing. It's also annoying.

Three episodes into Designated Survivor, ABC's new political thriller in which lowly US cabinet member Kiefer Sutherland gets promoted to president after a terrorist incident kills every member of the US government, and it's becoming clear that it's essentially a great big what if: 'What if a smart, liberal, circumspect Democrat were President following 9/11, rather than George W Bush? Would we still have invaded Afghanistan or Iraq? Would civil liberties still have been trampled? I bet not!' Married with West Wing and Dave-based optimism, the show effectively then shows us how everything should have been done.

Except it's not quite as simple as that. While the whole show does have a certain fluffiness to it, despite thousands of people having been killed, it also wants to demonstrate that such naivety won't get you very far in politics. Try to organise a heroic photo shoot in front of scared plebs and chances are you'll end up rushed away by your protective detail when the crowds turn ugly. Tell your one main political rival (Virginia Madsen) the truth and chances are it'll be used against you before she's even out the room. There's a dark underbelly of realpolitik to the show, with no good deed of Kiefer's ever going truly unpunished - only when his intelligence and compassion are married with a certain ruthless and deceptiveness does he manage to achieve what he wants.

Nevertheless, all that fantasising and 'we know better' is pretty irritating. The world doesn't work like that. That's why everything happened the way it did. The realpolitik only covers the fluffiness, not replace it.

On top of that, Designated Survivor's additional problems are small but numerous: Kiefer's family, including wife Natasha McElhone, are an endless drain on screen time, with the writers not having anything much to say about them other than "It's difficult being in the spotlight"; the supporting cast, including Kal Penn, are less political animals, more political poodles; there's minimal excitement in the FBI (principally Maggie Q)'s hunt for the terrorists, who from the end of the first episode were obviously going to be homegrown or working with elements in the US government; a repeated focus on administrative paperwork and how exactly you form a government when everyone's dead doesn't make for great TV; and not allowing Sutherland to go full Jack Bauer at every opportunity is clearly insane.

Combined with that omnipresent hindsight, Designated Survivor is less exciting, less dark than it should be, and watching it less than mandatory. I'll stick with it for a little longer, but unless they let Kiefer hulk out properly soon, this might a classic case of a promising idea that ends up mired in irrelevant detail.

Barrometer rating: 3
Would it be better with a female lead? Yes, if it were anyone except Kiefer 
TMINE's prediction: Could go either way. Might last more than a season, might not

Related entries

  • October 31, 2016: What have you been watching? Including Doctor Strange, Central Intelligence and X-Men: Apocalypse
    The TV I watched in the week ending Monday 31st October 2016
  • October 10, 2016: What have you been watching? Including Luke Cage, Arrow, The Flash and Westworld
    The TV I watched in the week ending Monday 10th October 2016
  • October 17, 2016: What have you been watching? Including Supergirl, Halt and Catch Fire and DC's Legends of Tomorrow
    The TV I watched in the week ending Monday 17th October 2016
  • November 14, 2016: What have you been watching? Including Frontier, People of Earth, Stan Against Evil and Ghostbusters
    The TV I watched in the week ending Monday 14th November 2016
  • November 21, 2016: What have you been watching? Including The Grand Tour, Hypernormalisation, Doctor Doctor and Travelers
    The TV I watched in the week ending Monday 21st November 2016
  • December 5, 2016: What have you been watching? Including פאודה (Fauda), Incorporated
    The TV I watched in the week ending Monday 5th December 2016

Read other posts about:

Allowable comments

You can leave just about any kind of comment you like. You can argue, suggest I am (or anyone else is) wrong, leaving general messages of love – anything. However, you absolutely can't leave messages that attack other commenters (or me), are simple variations of "your review sucks" or that are misogynistic, racist, homophobic, etc: your comment will either be edited or deleted and you'll be barred from leaving any further comments. We want to keep it civil here.


You can hide a spoiler by putting <spoiler> before it and </spoiler> after it. Hover over a spoiler to reveal it!

Featured Articles

The Bold Type

Journalism for people who can't read more than a Tweet