Categorised | US TV 2016

Tags | None

Review: Timeless 1x1 (US: NBC; UK: E4)

Posted on October 4, 2016 | Post a comment | Bookmark and Share

Timeless

In the US: Mondays, 10/9c, NBC
In the UK: Acquired by E4

Time and tide wait for no man, but that's not going to stop US TV networks trying this season. There's at least three time travel shows on the radar, with Making History hitting Fox in 2017, Frequency on The CW later this week and last night we got Timeless on NBC. 

Making a TV show about time travel shouldn't be too hard - and indeed all those shows are as different from each other as they are from Doctor Who - but Timeless arrives on our screens already bearing a lawsuit from the creators of El ministerio del tiempo (The Ministry of Time) for being just a tad too similar in concept. To be honest, though, I reckon the show's a Ron Silver or a Jean Claude Van Damme away from an equally valid suit from the creators of Time Cop.

Lots of black British actors are saying the only route to a good career these days is to head to the US. Certainly, everyone's favourite 'should have been Doctor Who' Paterson Joseph had to head over to the States to be able to have his own time machine. Although being the US where everything is bigger, better and available in more colours, he got two.

Trouble is the mega-wealthy Joseph didn't realise that time travel creates paradoxes, and although he kept his shiny time machines to himself, everyone's favourite handsome East European villain, Goran Višnjić (Extant, Practical Magic) has a book from the future telling him all about where the time machines are now, and he goes and steals one.

Joseph calls in the government for help, and the government calls in Delta operative Matt Lanter (Star Crossed, 90210) and professor of so much history Abigail Breslin (Rectify) to help them. Before you know it, Lanter, Breslin and one of Joseph's techies (Better Off Ted's Malcolm Barrett) are heading back into the past in the remaining time machine to prevent Višnjić from stopping America before it gets started. First stop, 1937 to ensure Višnjić can't… prevent the Hindenburg disaster? Hang on, that doesn't seem right.

Here's a trailer.

About
From Eric Kripke ("Revolution," "Supernatural"), Shawn Ryan ("The Shield") and the producers of "The Blacklist" comes this thrilling action-adventure series in which a mysterious criminal steals a secret state-of-the-art time machine, intent on destroying America as we know it by changing the past. Our only hope is an unexpected team: a scientist, a soldier and a history professor who use the machine's prototype to travel back in time to critical events. While they must make every effort not to affect the past themselves, they must also stay one step ahead of this dangerous fugitive. Can this handpicked team uncover the mystery behind it all and end his destruction before it's too late?

The cast includes Abigail Spencer, Matt Lanter, Malcolm Barrett, Goran Visnjic, Paterson Joseph, Sakina Jaffrey and Claudia Doumit.

Eric Kripke and Shawn Ryan serve as writers and executive producers. John Davis, John Fox, Marney Hochman and Director Neil Marshall also executive produce. "Timeless" is produced by Davis Entertainment, Kripke Enterprises and MiddKid Productions in association with Sony Pictures Television.

Is it any good?
It's brainless fun, the kind of show you'd have loved when you were 12 years old, but oddly, it's not as much fun as it should be.

For starters, there are all kinds of rules about not changing the past, not going to a time where you already exist in case you meet yourself and bits fall off you, and so on. That's a downer.

Then there's the acknowledgement that Barrett is basically the Kenny from South Park of the piece. They're going to go back in time to the 1960s and earlier, and he's black. What could go wrong? Even Barrett is upset at the prospect and spends most of the first episode attracting glares, having to lurk outside shops, sitting in the back of buses and bracing himself for police abuse, rather than play with the others. That's definitely not fun.

Lantner is very pretty but a Delta he is not and he's too busy moping about his dead wife to spend time developing a character. That just leaves Spencer to be the heroine of the piece. Now Spencer's always good, reliable and solid (cf SuitsMad Men), and her role has the potential to be the true source of fun here. After all, we have a history professor getting to go back in time and experience everything first hand. True, experience everything first hand then dick it all up, but she should be having a ball. She should be a gushing nerd of excitement all the time.

Instead, although she gets a moment or two, when she's not busy moping about her dying mum or her sister, she's mainly there to be mum. She's there to tell the naughty boys who haven't done their homework what the history is in remarkably dull detail - she literally knows the time of every single thing that leads up to the Hindenburg disaster - and then to tell them off as they start dicking it up.

Also, the Hindenburg disaster. Really? Is that a budget thing or did Shawn Ryan and Eric Kripke really think that the most exciting destination for a time travel show's first episode was an exploding Nazi balloon? They had the whole of history for Višnjić to sabotage and they have him go to 1937?

So not as much fun from the characters as there should be and not as much fun from the locales as there should be. The ongoing plot - why Višnjić is doing all this and where he got the book from - is a bit dull, too, although there is at least some nuance to it. More or less the only thing about the show that is fun is Joseph, who seems to be having a whale of a time being an eccentrically English Steve Jobs - although not as eccentrically English as guest star Matt Frewer.

Not the worst time travel show there's ever been and the fact there are at least repercussions to actions in the past that enable our history to be changed does at least make it slightly different from others. However, unless there's a distinct perking up in subsequent episodes, Timeless is going to be anything but.

Related entries

  • October 7, 2016: Review: Frequency 1x1 (US: The CW)
    A review of the first episode of The CW's Frequency
  • October 19, 2016: Review: Travelers (Canada: Showcase; UK: Netflix)
    A review of the first episode of Showcase/Netflix's Travelers
  • October 18, 2016: Third-episode verdict: Timeless (US: NBC; UK: E4)
    A review of the first three episodes of NBC/E4's Timeless
  • October 31, 2016: What have you been watching? Including Doctor Strange, Central Intelligence and X-Men: Apocalypse
    The TV I watched in the week ending Monday 31st October 2016
  • October 10, 2016: What have you been watching? Including Luke Cage, Arrow, The Flash and Westworld
    The TV I watched in the week ending Monday 10th October 2016
  • October 17, 2016: What have you been watching? Including Supergirl, Halt and Catch Fire and DC's Legends of Tomorrow
    The TV I watched in the week ending Monday 17th October 2016
  • November 7, 2016: What have you been watching? Including Falling Water, Hyde and Seek, Lucifer, Supergirl and Timeless
    The TV I watched in the week ending Monday 7th November 2016
  • November 28, 2016: What have you been watching? Including Goliath, Finding Dory, Chance and Frequency
    The TV I watched in the week ending Monday 28th November 2016
  • November 21, 2016: What have you been watching? Including The Grand Tour, Hypernormalisation, Doctor Doctor and Travelers
    The TV I watched in the week ending Monday 21st November 2016
  • November 25, 2016: When's that show you mentioned starting again, TMINE? Including Travelers and Timeless
    What acquisition premiere dates have been announced in the week ending Friday 25th November 2016
  • December 5, 2016: What have you been watching? Including פאודה (Fauda), Incorporated
    The TV I watched in the week ending Monday 5th December 2016
  • December 12, 2016: What have you been watching? Including Jason Bourne, Dirk Gently's Holistic Detective Agency and Ash vs Evil Dead
    The TV I watched in the week ending Monday 12th December 2016
  • December 19, 2016: What have you been watching? Including Rogue One, Nobel, The OA and Chance
    The TV I watched in the week ending Monday 19th December 2016
  • January 30, 2017: What have you been watching? Including Fortitude, The Magicians, The Flash and DC's Legends of Tomorrow
    Reviews of 24/1/17-30/1/17's episodes of DC's Legends of Tomorrow, The Flash, Fortitude, Lethal Weapon, Lucifer, The Magicians, Man Seeking Woman, Six and Timeless
  • January 23, 2017: What have you been watching? Including The Magnificent Seven, Shooter, Lucifer and The Man in the High Castle
    The TV I watched in the week ending Monday 23rd January 2017
  • February 6, 2017: What have you been watching? Including Detroiters, Amadeus and Cardinal
    Reviews of 31/1/17-6/2/17's episodes of Cardinal, DC's Legends of Tomorrow, The Flash, Fortitude, Lucifer, The Magicians, Man Seeking Woman, Riverdale and Timeless
  • February 27, 2017: What have you been watching? Including Doubt, Patriot, Training Day and Billions
    Reviews of 13/2/17-27/2/17's episodes of 24: Legacy, Cardinal, DC's Legends of Tomorrow, The Flash, Fortitude, The Great Indoors, Lethal Weapon, The Magicians, Man Seeking Woman, Powerless, Son of Zorn, Timeless, Billions, Doubt, Patriot and Training Day
  • February 13, 2017: What have you been watching? Including Fortitude, The Great Indoors, The Magicians, Powerless and Son of Zorn
    Reviews of 7/2/17-13/2/17's episodes of DC's Legends of Tomorrow, The Flash, Fortitude, The Great Indoors, Lethal Weapon, The Magicians, Man Seeking Woman, Powerless, Son of Zorn, and Timeless
  • March 8, 2017: Review: Making History 1x1 (US: Fox)
    A review of the first episode of Fox's Making History
  • March 9, 2017: Review: Time After Time 1x1-1x2 (US: ABC)
    A review of the first two episodes of ABC's Time After Time

Allowable comments

You can leave just about any kind of comment you like. You can argue, suggest I am (or anyone else is) wrong, leaving general messages of love – anything. However, you absolutely can't leave messages that attack other commenters (or me), are simple variations of "your review sucks" or that are misogynistic, racist, homophobic, etc: your comment will either be edited or deleted and you'll be barred from leaving any further comments. We want to keep it civil here.

Spoilers

You can hide a spoiler by putting <spoiler> before it and </spoiler> after it. Hover over a spoiler to reveal it!

Featured Articles

Twin Peaks

Lynch at his best in years