Categorised | UK TV reviews

Tags |

Third-episode verdict: Stan Lee's Lucky Man (UK: Sky1)

Posted on February 11, 2016 | Post a comment | Bookmark and Share

BarrometerLuckyMan.jpgA Barrometer rating of 2

In the UK: Fridays, 9pm, Sky1

Stan Lee's Lucky Man's biggest asset is also its biggest problem - Stan Lee. He came up with the idea for the show, it's his name that probably got the show made and it's that name that will get most viewers tuning in.

Trouble is, as soon as you stick the name Stan Lee in the title, there's a certain expectation there'll be superheroics and super-fun. Unfortunately, in the hands of series writer Neil Biswas (The Take), there's neither.

The show sees James Nesbitt play a cop with a gambling problem who suddenly gets a mystical lucky bracelet that helps him both to win big at the casino and to solve crimes, but at a price to others. There's the occasional bit of supernaturalness thanks to said bracelet, but we're largely talking about things falling on the floor at opportune moments so that Nesbitt can spot there's something under a table, rather than Final Destination-style domino effects resulting in bags of money to fall into Nesbitt's lap. Not at all the time - there's a speedboat chase in episode one and an impressive sprint across a busy motorway in episode two, for example, but that's as superheroic as the show has managed to get.

Rather than superheroics, what we've had in spades instead is Nesbitt moping around, getting upset by his good luck's flipside effects on others, and investigating murders, all while leather-clad motorcylist Sienna Guillory drops by to provide the occasional hint about the bracelet's powers and various members of the police grouch about Nesbitt's supposed corrupt tendencies. An interesting character study mixed with a bit of fantasy and a police procedural? Yes. Something to rival Daredevil? Not in the slightest.

If you keep that in mind, chances are you might enjoy the show. There's a decent enough supporting cast, even if Nesbitt is miscast; the story's not bad and is even a bit edgy; and what supernatural qualities the show does have it does well. It's even got Banshee's 'Albino' (Londoner Joseph Gatt) as the big bad who's after Nesbitt's jewellery. 

It's just not the new superhero show you might have been looking for.

Barrometer rating: 2
Would the show be better with a female lead? Yes
TMINE's prediction: Unlikely to get a second series unless it gets any overseas sales

Related entries

  • February 14, 2016: What have you been watching? Including The Man From UNCLE, Sicario
    The TV I watched in the week ending Saturday 12th February 2016
  • February 20, 2016: What have you been watching? Including Vinyl, Wanted and Vikings
    The TV I watched in the week ending Saturday 19th February 2016
  • March 14, 2016: What have you been watching? Including Flaked, The Intern, Lucifer and Billions
    The TV I watched in the week ending Monday 14th March 2016
  • March 4, 2016: What have you been watching? Including Ófærð (Trapped), The Shannara Chronicles, Lucifer and The X-Files
    The TV I watched in the two weeks ending Friday 4th March 2016
  • March 21, 2016: What have you been watching? Including Spotlight, The Americans, Second Chance, The Magicians,
    The TV I watched in the week ending Monday 21st March 2016
  • April 2, 2016: What have you been watching? Including Banshee, Blå Ögon (Blue Eyes), The Catch, Supergirl and The Americans
    The TV I watched in the week ending Saturday 2nd April 2016

Read other posts about:

Allowable comments

You can leave just about any kind of comment you like. You can argue, suggest I am (or anyone else is) wrong, leaving general messages of love – anything. However, you absolutely can't leave messages that attack other commenters (or me), are simple variations of "your review sucks" or that are misogynistic, racist, homophobic, etc: your comment will either be edited or deleted and you'll be barred from leaving any further comments. We want to keep it civil here.

Spoilers

You can hide a spoiler by putting <spoiler> before it and </spoiler> after it. Hover over a spoiler to reveal it!

Featured Articles

Twin Peaks

Lynch at his best in years