Categorised | International TV

Tags | None

Third-episode verdict: The Doctor Blake Mysteries (ABC1/ITV)

Posted on February 18, 2013 | Post a comment | Bookmark and Share

BarrometerDrBlake.jpgA Barrometer rating of 2

In Australia: Fridays, 8.30pm, ABC1
In the UK: Will air on ITV. No air date yet
In the rest of the world: Not yet acquired

Time to pass a judgemental eye over the first three episodes of ABC1's Doctor Blake Mysteries, in which former Neighbours stalwart Craig McClachlan proves that's he's actually now a pretty good actor, while healing the sick and solving murders in a small town in Victoria, Australia, c1959. 

The first episode was pretty good, giving us all the elements of the show, including an intriguing and strong lead character, a decent supporting cast, a proper mystery that needed to be solved and some fine period details. Dr Blake was perhaps implausibly liberal, always on the right side of impending historic arguments, and the show really hammered that point home, but that was a minor niggle really.

Episode two was even an improvement, building up all the characters, giving us police beatings in a Life On Mars "things were different back then" style. The background to Blake and his days in military intelligence and Singapore was well handled (a call-out to McClachlan's Heroes II?), and the final scenes with the Anzacs were actually very moving. We also got a little on the history of Luminol, which was a clever CSI touch that CSI has never brought up.

Which takes up nicely to episode three, which while otherwise excellent, was slightly undermined by a snigger-worthy murder weapon - an Asian pit viper - that our doctor was able to handle perhaps a little too easily and with perhaps a little too silly a directorial choice to indicate he was thinking about snakes.

Nevertheless, we once again had some good period details, ranging from the use of Australian pounds and the ubiquity of the vacuum salesman (the vacuum being an expensive household purchase) to attitudes towards homosexuality at the time. Again, Blake turns out to be on the right liberal side of the argument, but at least the show comes up with an explanation this time. We also again had a moving ending to the piece, this time between Blake and his housekeeper, which is becoming a touching love story of sorts.

As a piece, the show is a mix of the conventional murder mystery and historical commentary. As a murder mystery, it's surprisingly good, being complex without being complicated, the eventual solution potentially guessable and Blake coming to his own conclusions without mysterious hunches at the last moment. It certainly beats the BBC's Father Brown

Not being Australian, I can't really say just how attentive to period detail the show is, and unlike Mad Men, say, it certainly has that knowing hindsight that enables everyone to come out likable and with modern day-compatible prejudices. But it still feels like the 1950s, from the cars and people's attitudes to the stories themselves.

All in all, if you do like a historic murder mystery, then this is up there with the top of the current worldwide crop, including The Murdoch Mysteries, Whitechapel and Endeavour. One to seek out.

Related entries

  • March 5, 2014: Review: Janet King 1x1 (ABC1)
    A review of ABC1’s Janet King
  • April 3, 2014: Review: Friends With Better Lives 1x1 (CBS)
    A review of the first episode of Friends With Better Lives
  • February 16, 2015: What have you been watching? Including Gallipoli, The Slap (US) and The Doctor Blake Mysteries
    A review of the TV and films I watched in the week ending February 16 2015
  • February 23, 2015: What have you been watching? Including Hostages, The Odd Couple, X Company, Living With Models and Bosch
    A review of the TV and films I watched in the week ending February 23 2015
  • March 30, 2015: What have you been watching? Including Bloodline, The Good Witch, 19-2 and Fortitude
    A review of the TV and films I watched in the week ending March 30 2015
  • March 9, 2015: What have you been watching? Including Dig, Maximum Choppage, The Americans, Fortitude, 12 Monkeys and Vikings
    A review of the TV and films I watched in the week ending March 9 2015
  • March 16, 2015: What have you been watching? Including The Producers, Divergent, Dig, Gallipoli, Fortitude and Vikings
    A review of the TV and films I watched in the week ending March 16 2015
  • March 23, 2015: What have you been watching? Including Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt, Community, The Flash and 19-2
    A review of the TV and films I watched in the week ending March 23 2015
  • April 13, 2015: What have you been watching? Including American Odyssey, Daredevil, Olympus and Silicon Valley
    A review of the TV and films I watched in the week ending April 13 2015
  • February 14, 2016: What have you been watching? Including The Man From UNCLE, Sicario
    The TV I watched in the week ending Saturday 12th February 2016
  • February 20, 2016: What have you been watching? Including Vinyl, Wanted and Vikings
    The TV I watched in the week ending Saturday 19th February 2016
  • March 14, 2016: What have you been watching? Including Flaked, The Intern, Lucifer and Billions
    The TV I watched in the week ending Monday 14th March 2016
  • March 4, 2016: What have you been watching? Including Ófærð (Trapped), The Shannara Chronicles, Lucifer and The X-Files
    The TV I watched in the two weeks ending Friday 4th March 2016
  • March 21, 2016: What have you been watching? Including Spotlight, The Americans, Second Chance, The Magicians,
    The TV I watched in the week ending Monday 21st March 2016
  • April 2, 2016: What have you been watching? Including Banshee, Blå Ögon (Blue Eyes), The Catch, Supergirl and The Americans
    The TV I watched in the week ending Saturday 2nd April 2016

Allowable comments

You can leave just about any kind of comment you like. You can argue, suggest I am (or anyone else is) wrong, leaving general messages of love – anything. However, you absolutely can't leave messages that attack other commenters (or me), are simple variations of "your review sucks" or that are misogynistic, racist, homophobic, etc: your comment will either be edited or deleted and you'll be barred from leaving any further comments. We want to keep it civil here.

Spoilers

You can hide a spoiler by putting <spoiler> before it and </spoiler> after it. Hover over a spoiler to reveal it!

Featured Articles

Famous In Love

A slap in the face to aspiring actresses