Categorised | US TV reviews

Third-episode verdict: Elementary (CBS/Sky Living)

Posted on October 22, 2012 | Post a comment | Bookmark and Share

BarrometerElementary.jpgA Barrometer rating of 3

In the US: Thursdays, 10/9c, CBS
In the UK: Tuesdays, 9pm, Sky Living. Starts tomorrow

Three episodes into CBS's Elementary and I can conclusively report that Steven Moffat has nothing to fear from CBS's modern-day Sherlock Holmes retelling. Now this isn't just because the two are so radically different that beyond the names Holmes and Watson, there's very little in common. No, it's because although Sherlock is itself flawed, Elementary just isn't as good.

The show's biggest problem, as I remarked in my first episode review, is that it's a procedural. Nothing wrong with that in itself, because in a sense, the Sherlock Holmes stories were procedurals. But problematically for Elementary, which is a crime procedural, the Holmes stories were mystery procedurals: a mystery that needs solving - strange behaviour, a secret code, etc - rather than a killer that needs to be found. A lot of the time, the perpetrator of the crime is known in the Holmes stories - it's what he wants and how he's doing the crime are what have to be revealed, and that are the unusual and interesting aspects of the story.

Elementary, however, mostly just uses Holmes' headline inductive/deductive powers to work out what happened at a crime scene so that the not-especially-interesting killer can be revealed. Not always - the second episode is more of a mystery than a crime procedural - but largely this is the same old CBS police show with a twist, in the same vein as The Mentalist.

The show is also very Holmes-lite. Apart from his deductive skills and his drug-addiction, there's very little of the man himself in this Holmes, with the writers adding a little reference or quote each episode from the original, just to reassure you that this still is Holmes, even though there's been nothing quite as brilliant as even Conan Doyle's weakest observations in the originals.

Disappointingly, just as Jonny Lee Miller isn't an especially charismatic Holmes, albeit one who takes his top off a lot to show his tattoos, Lucy Liu is a somewhat bland Watson, the producers giving her very little to do beyond talk about Holmes' drug addiction. Attempts to make them a sort of Odd Couple really just aren't working. And the supporting cast are practically non-existent, with even Aidan Quinn's Captain Gregson largely there just to say 'Yes, Holmes' and, more frequently, 'No, Holmes.'

But it's not terrible. It's no worse than any random given episode of any other CBS procedural. If all you want to do is unwind at the end of the day in front of the tele, you could do far worse. But don't expect to have your brain challenged in any way.

Barrometer rating: 3

Related entries

  • January 26, 2015: What have you been watching? Including Backstrom, Young Drunk Punk, 19-2, Spiral and Galavant
    A review of the TV and films I watched in the week ending January 26 2015
  • January 12, 2015: What have you been watching? Including Empire, Togetherness, Taken 3, Engrenages (Spiral) and Banshee
    A review of the TV and films I watched in the week ending January 12 2015
  • January 19, 2015: What have you been watching? Including Hindsight, Elementary, Banshee, Spiral and Constantine
    A review of the TV and films I watched in the week ending January 19 2015
  • February 2, 2015: What have you been watching? Including Gone Girl, Suits, Spiral, The Blacklist and The Americans
    A review of the TV and films I watched in the week ending February 2 2015
  • February 9, 2015: What have you been watching? Including Hiding, Winter, One Man, Two Guvnors and Agent Carter
    A review of the TV and films I watched in the week ending February 9 2015

Read other posts about: ,

Allowable comments

You can leave just about any kind of comment you like. You can argue, suggest I am (or anyone else is) wrong, leaving general messages of love – anything. However, you absolutely can't leave messages that attack other commenters (or me), are simple variations of "your review sucks" or that are misogynistic, racist, homophobic, etc: your comment will either be edited or deleted and you'll be barred from leaving any further comments. We want to keep it civil here.


You can hide a spoiler by putting <spoiler> before it and </spoiler> after it. Hover over a spoiler to reveal it!

Featured Articles

The Bold Type

Journalism for people who can't read more than a Tweet