Categorised | US TV reviews

Review: Girls (HBO) 1x1

Posted on April 17, 2012 | Post a comment | Bookmark and Share

HBO's Girls

In the US: Sundays, 10.30pm, HBO

And so HBO's quest for the new Sex and the City continues. Take four women, stick them in a city, let them talk to each other a lot, particularly about sex. Hey presto! You have a new Sex and the City. Magic or what?

Clearly, it's not as easy as all that, though, or Cashmere Mafia, Lipstick Jungle, Women's Murder Club, and all the other SatC knock-offs US TV has thrown at us over the past half-decade or so all would be hit TV shows and movies by now.

However, HBO's Girls has a lot better chance of being the new Sex and the City. I think. Trouble is, unlike Sex and the City which really was a truly universal show (if you took the trouble to watch it), Girls is a show that maybe only girls will watch. And I mean girls - or at least young women, here - because this is a show that (probably) has its finger so close to the pulse of young American women's lives (or at least East Coast, white, straight, middle to upper-middle class women's lives) that if it gets any closer, there'll be arterial spray hitting the walls in thousands of houses. And by girls, I also mean girls who love indie movies since this is effectively Sex and the City if it had been written by Ibsen on one of his cheerier days.

But I'm not a girl, so how should I know?

If you're in the US, you can see for yourself with the whole of the first episode on YouTube:

Otherwise, you'll have to make do with this trailer:

About
Created by and starring Lena Dunham ("Tiny Furniture"), the show is a comic look at the assorted humiliations and rare triumphs of a group of girls in their early 20s. Dunham wrote and directed the pilot of the series, which she executive produces along with Judd Apatow and Jenni Konner. The cast also includes Jemima Kirke, Allison Williams, Adam Driver and Zosia Mamet. Episodes were shot in New York. The ten-episode season debuts in 2012.

Is it any good?
Written by, directed by, starring and executive produced by Lena Durham who made the rather similar Tiny Furniture

…this is a show that tries to depict the problems of modern life for (a certain demographic subset of) young women in a semi-humorous fashion. It faces two problems here:

  1. It's trying to do all of these problems at the same time
  2. It makes the same mistake as early Sex and the City by essentially making all the female characters thoroughly unlikable.

Take. for example, unpaid interning. This is a terrible problem that's afflicting the job markets in both the US and the UK. But Girls has Lena Durham's unpaid intern being possibly the biggest ingrate imaginable, demanding that her parents pay her over $1,000 a month for over two years so that she can finish writing her memoirs (she's 24), rather than get an actual job and/or skills that her English literature degree didn't provide her with. You kind of wish Erica from Being Erica would turn up from behind a door to help her fix her life and herself.

And it's all like that. With every possible problem for Durham and her friends that arises, be it pregnancy, bad boyfriends or a dinner party, you end up wishing hellfire to rain down on all of them because they're all so insufferably spoilt. It's like a female indie version of Whit Stillman. Yes, an indie version of Whit Stillman - that's how indie this is.

Now, this could all be very well observed stuff and it's all a lot more watchable than HBO's Enlightened, which trod a similar path with Laura Dern's older character. There's wit and intelligence in practically every line. Like Sex and the City, there's also sex and a good percentage of the first episode looks at young women's (and men's) attitudes to sex, which it handles in a relatively humorous way.

But, again, the desperate need for fire and brimstone to rain down upon the characters will fill your every thought as you watch this. If you can take that, particularly if you're a girl, this could be the show for you. After all, there are plenty of shows and movies with spoilt, douchebag male characters as their leads. Archer, for example, is awesome. But then Archer is funny. Girls isn't. It's witty. It's not funny.

At the moment, though, I can only marvel at the talent of Lena Durham, wonder how she managed to surround herself with so many non-descript other actresses who make no impression beyond their accent (in the British character's case), and hope that she goes on to give us something better, either in later episodes or in a completely different project.

By the way, Judd Apatow is another exec producer on this. Yes, the producer of The Hangover, Bridesmaids, etc. How odd.

Related entries

  • April 18, 2012: Nepotism on Girls
    A pastiche of HBO's Girls' poster, looking at nepotism
  • April 23, 2012: Question of the week: do you need to be in it?
    Do you feel the need to be represented in drama?
  • July 30, 2012: Boys - not Girls, but similar
    A parody of Girls called Boys
  • February 16, 2013: On the ubiquity of advertising for TV shows in the US
    How to advertise TV shows the US way
  • October 1, 2013: Tina Fey parodies Girls
    Tina Fey's parody of Girls from Saturday Night Live
  • September 2, 2014: Mini-review: The Cosmopolitans 1x1 (Amazon Prime)
    A review of the first episode of Amazon Prime’s The Cosmopolitans
  • October 31, 2016: Third-episode verdict: Insecure (US: HBO; UK: Sky Atlantic)
    A review of the first three episodes of HBO/Sky Atlantic's Insecure
  • November 24, 2016: Review: Search Party 1x1-1x2 (US: TBS)
    A review of the first two episodes of TBS's Search Party

Read other posts about:

Allowable comments

You can leave just about any kind of comment you like. You can argue, suggest I am (or anyone else is) wrong, leaving general messages of love – anything. However, you absolutely can't leave messages that attack other commenters (or me), are simple variations of "your review sucks" or that are misogynistic, racist, homophobic, etc: your comment will either be edited or deleted and you'll be barred from leaving any further comments. We want to keep it civil here.

Spoilers

You can hide a spoiler by putting <spoiler> before it and </spoiler> after it. Hover over a spoiler to reveal it!

Featured Articles

Snatch

Not properly pukka