Categorised | Fall 2008

Tags | None

Review: Crusoe 1x1-1x2

Posted on October 23, 2008 | 6 comments |

Crusoe

In the US: Fridays, 9/8c, NBC

Setting's very important to a story. Stick Crusoe on Saturday evening in a teatime slot in the UK and it would be a whole load of family fun. Sure, the purists would be complaining that this adaptation of Robinson Crusoe plays extremely fast and loose with the book - and indeed starts halfway through it - and seems to have been crossed with Pirates of the Caribbean and The Admirable Crichton along the way.

But this is a post-Merlin age and we'd have been quite happy with a big budget escapist bit of tatt that might at least get a couple of kids reading books and thinking about history and issues.

However, it's not going out on Saturday night ITV1. It's Friday night NBC fun in the US. They're aiming it at adults, the fools. That's never going to work.

Plot
From Power, Muse and Moonlighting Films comes an ambitious adaptation of Daniel Defoe's masterpiece, "Crusoe," a new primetime series for a 21st Century audience. Following the novel and its treasured tale of adventure, this high-action, fast-paced, thirteen-part series will combine for the first time the pace and energy of network television while remaining faithful to the author’s original classic story.

The drama explores the perils and challenges facing the world’s most famous castaway as Crusoe (Philip Winchester, "Flyboys," "Thunderbirds") and his native friend Friday (Tongayi Chirisa) struggle to survive on a desert island with little more than their wits. Overcoming marauding militias, hungry cannibals, wild cats, starvation and apocalyptic lightning storms, Crusoe dreams of the day he will be reunited with his beloved family.

Allowed to develop away from the bonds of 17th Century life, the ingenious Crusoe builds a breathtaking and altogether modern home high up in the trees to elude his enemies. Friday and Crusoe’s deep friendship is pushed to the limit as opportunities to escape their island paradise, and the people they meet there, consistently challenge them to choose between loyalty and freedom.

As the series develops, the love story between Crusoe and his wife Susannah (Anna Walton, "The Mutant Chronicles," "Hell Boy II: The Golden Army") left behind in England will unfold from meeting to marriage, as will his relationship with his mentor and patron, the mysterious Jeremiah Blackthorn (Sam Neill, "The Tudors," "Jurassic Park").

"Crusoe" is being executive produced by Justin Bodle for Power, Jeff Hayes for Bluewater Productions, Michael Prupas for Muse, Genevieve Hofmeyr and Phillip Key for Moonlighting and Stephen Greenberg and Jean Bureau for Incendo Productions.

Is it any good?
On the one hand, I feel I should be flying the flag of patriotism for this show. It's the first time in 40 years (allegedly) that a US network has gone directly to a British production company directly and asked it to make a show. Crusoe has a predominantly British cast - although since he has an amazing sixth sense that enables him to smell international co-production funding at anything up to 6,000 miles' distance, Sam Neill's in it, too. All the flashback scenes are filmed in York. And it's written by British people, too.

But for a primetime US show aimed at adults - and obviously we're also living in a post-Knight Rider remake age - it's a bit daft.

Essentially, Crusoe is all about the japes and fun a shipwrecked Englishman and a bright 'savage' (who can speak 13 languages, etc) can have together on an 18th century desert island when facing Spaniards, pirates, girl pirates, and other assorted fairground ride attractions, while living it up in a Heath-Robinson-esque tree house of tomorrow together.

So there's lots of sword-fighting, bizarre inventions, people going 'arr', running through jungles, Crusoe taking his shirt off to show off his pecs, etc.

To convince people this isn't really just like one of those 1950s ITC shows of admirably bad quality and minimal literary input (The Adventures of Robin Hood, Ivanhoe, The Count of Monte Cristo, The Adventures of Sir Lancelot, The Buccaneers, Sir Francis Drake), interspersed throughout are Crusoe's flashbacks to a normal life back in England, with his wife, Sean Bean (as Crusoe's dad!) and Sam Neill. These are all very, very worthy, anachronistic, etc, just as you'd expect, but do at least break-up the scenes with the Johnny Depp impersonators.

Everything's slightly painful but not too awful, as you might expect given that Steven Gallagher, creator of The Eleventh Hour is behind it all. Winchester and Chirisa are acceptable enough leads, although aren't especially charismatic. The action's good, but not especially engrossing, since there's no real depth to it.

For adult television, it leaves a lot to be desired. Watch it with the kids and it'll probably be okay though.

Here's a YouTube promo

6 Comments

  1. stu-n LiveJournal wrote:
    October 23, 2008 | Reply

    Crusoe is all about the japes and fun a shipwrecked Englishman and a bright 'savage' can have... living it up in a Heath-Robinson-esque tree house of tomorrow together.

    The slashfic writers are going to love this.

    Crusoe taking his shirt off to show off his pecs

    Oh, yes they are.

  2. MediumRob MT replied to stu-n's comment:
    October 23, 2008 | Reply

    Tee hee. I know!

  3. Cindylover1969 wrote:
    October 23, 2008 | Reply

    It's the first time in 40 years (allegedly) that a US network has gone directly to a British production company directly and asked it to make a show.

    With a little help from Canada (Muse) and the Bulgaria of equatorial low-budget film production, South Africa (Moonlighting). I think I might just decide to finally see that '50s version instead.

  4. Jane Henry wrote:
    October 24, 2008 | Reply

    Yup. Kids would definitely go for that. So would Spouse, and I probably wouldn't care nearly as much about the liberties played with the text as I do watching Merlin, because despite being the first novel in the English Language (or not if you take the feminist interpretation that Aphra Behn's Orinooko was) it is fearfully dull, so it looks as though they've spiced it up a tad. And I have a feeling the version I watched as a kid wasn't exactly true to the original.

  5. MediumRob MT replied to Cindylover1969's comment:
    October 24, 2008 | Reply

    Well, they did go to the British company first. They then took one look out the window and said "We might need to do some foreign filming on this one" and went co-prod.

  6. Cindylover1969 wrote:
    October 24, 2008 | Reply

    Yep, that sounds about right.

Leave a comment

Your comment


Comment preview

Subscribe to comments
You can subscribe to comments using one of the methods below:

Comments feed for this entry

Comments feed for the blog

Allowable comments
You can leave just about any kind of comment you like. You can argue, suggest I am (or anyone else is) wrong, leaving general messages of love – anything. However, you absolutely can't leave messages that are general insults or abusive: your comment will either be edited or deleted and you'll be barred from leaving any further comments. We want to keep it civil here.

Spoilers
If you're going to put something you think is a spoiler into one of your comments, put <spoiler> in front of it and </spoiler> after it; if your spoiler is long, remember to put the tags before and after every paragraph. Your spoiler will then only appear if anyone highlights it with their mouse. Remember: your comments also show up in the sidebar at the side of every page!

HTML and User pics
For details of what HTML you can use and how you can get a picture next to your comments, please read the comment guidelines, first.

Featured Articles

Rupert Penry-Jones tells all

Gone but not Forgotten