Categorised | None

Tags | None

Why is Five bringing back Superstars?

Posted on June 24, 2008 | 3 comments |

Anyone know why Five is bringing back classic 70s sports show Superstars?

Not only has BBC1 tried it and failed – perhaps because they had Johnny Vaughn as the main host and he's best at armchair comedy – they're bringing it back and messing around with the format. This time it's going to be teams (three men and one woman in each).

Anyone going to watch it? Anyone got any ideas about why they're bringing it back?

3 Comments

  1. espedair wrote:
    June 24, 2008 | Reply

    Channel 5 is the king of cheese tv... I mean this is a channel who ran Fort Boyard for 4 series.. (apparently.. I mean I don't know or anything....?!) I am constantly amazed when the show something which is NOT total shash.. this is perfect teatime family fodder.. although I am holding out for a re-make of Junior Kick start! (think of the music).

    http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=3J9uOmWuKr0

  2. stu-n LiveJournal wrote:
    June 25, 2008 | Reply

    They're bringing it back because of the nostalgia factor, but it won't work because it can't be the same programme. Original Superstars was brilliant because it was current top sportsmen competing and making complete tits of themselves (Kevin Keegan falling off the bike, that cheating bastard Jody Schecter putting oil on his soles in the gym tests so he could do faster squat thrusts) — and the following week Keegan would be turning out for Liverpool and Schecter would be trying to drive someone off the track in Monza. You couldn't do that these days, because no top sportsman would risk getting injured doing something trivial.

    (Unless you're Rio Ferdinand, and you knacker your ankles by putting your feet up to play video games.)

    So they're only going to be able to use retired sportspeople, and even then, they can't get many of them, so they have to keep using the same ones. Which means this is Dad TV, so it's competing with Top Gear, so it's doomed.

  3. MediumRob MT replied to stu-n's comment:
    June 25, 2008 | Reply

    Anything competing with Top Gear should be doomed.

Leave a comment

Your comment


Comment preview

Subscribe to comments
You can subscribe to comments using one of the methods below:

Comments feed for this entry

Comments feed for the blog

Allowable comments
You can leave just about any kind of comment you like. You can argue, suggest I am (or anyone else is) wrong, leaving general messages of love – anything. However, you absolutely can't leave messages that are general insults or abusive: your comment will either be edited or deleted and you'll be barred from leaving any further comments. We want to keep it civil here.

Spoilers
If you're going to put something you think is a spoiler into one of your comments, put <spoiler> in front of it and </spoiler> after it; if your spoiler is long, remember to put the tags before and after every paragraph. Your spoiler will then only appear if anyone highlights it with their mouse. Remember: your comments also show up in the sidebar at the side of every page!

HTML and User pics
For details of what HTML you can use and how you can get a picture next to your comments, please read the comment guidelines, first.

Featured Articles

Rupert Penry-Jones tells all

Gone but not Forgotten