Categorised | British TV

Questions and realisations from television last month

Posted on February 16, 2008 | 5 comments |

After a long absence, here are my latest questions and realisations that my brain has generated over the last month that I couldn't be arsed to put into individual entries. Actually, I didn't have any questions, just realisations

  1. Realisation: There's nothing more disconcerting than a first-run Christmas episode in January.
  2. Realisation: The 80s were small and blurry
  3. Realisation: Sayid is the most interesting character in Lost
  4. Realisation: It's now possible to spot a Groundhog Day episode within its first three seconds

1 Realisation: There's nothing more disconcerting than a first-run Christmas episode in January.
This realisation came about from watching House. Now we're all probably used to watching a Christmas episode re-run at the wrong time of year and thinking to ourselves, “Oh, that was probably on at Christmas when it first aired.” There's a similar effect when you're watching a show from another country (eg UK viewer watching US show): “Oh, that was probably on at Christmas when it first aired in the US.”

But when you're watching a new episode of a show as it airs, if it's Christmas in their world and it's not in yours, it's very strange. You start looking for plot explanations (Is it a flashback? A time travel episode? Someone going mad?). Why are they celebrating Christmas in January?

And then you realise it's because they've been holding over episodes because of the writers' strike. Yet, you remain strangely disturbed by the whole experience.

2 Realisation: The 80s were blurry
I realised this while watching Ashes to Ashes this week. A much better episode than the first, I thought. The characters felt more real, the plot was less jumbled and it's clear you're really not supposed to like Alex in the slightest - you're supposed to be rooting for Gene Hunt - and that she really is going to be the snooty bint who gets to find her humanity through bickering with a sexist git (à la Moonlighting), who will be similarly tamed.

Nevertheless, despite the numerous anachronisms (the Met having desktop PCs with hard drives in 1981, etc) and the disturbing revelation that I had 75% of the songs from the episode's soundtrack in my iTunes collection ('We Fade to Grey' by Visage, 'Money' by the Flying Lizards: yey!), the thing that stuck with me most was the direction, which was so 1980s at times, I was having serious flashbacks to Edge of Darkness. The compositions, choice of mid-shots, etc were almost identical.

Yet… it wasn't quite right. Thanks to the magic of DigiBeta, everything was too widescreen, too crystal sharp. The 80s was 4:3, dim and slightly blurry thanks to the lighting and film stock used (we're not talking 16mm miseries like The Adventurer, mind). So even though '80s shows' were being homaged and the direction is spot on, it doesn't quite feel right.

Still, I hear Kudos tried to get the Beeb to let them shoot Life on Mars as 4:3, etc, but the Beeb was worried everyone would think it was a repeat, so you can't really blame the producers for that. I wonder if the US version will be able to make the leap (remember Police Squad 'in color'?) when it eventually arrives.

3 Realisation: Sayid is the most interesting character in Lost
Well, he just is, isn't he? None of the tediousness of Jate and Skate. He's just a hard Indian-Iraqi. I hope that the final Oceanic Six will include him, Desmond and Locke, purely so they can have their own spin-off detective agency show afterwards.

4 Realisation: It's now possible to spot a Groundhog Day episode within its first three seconds
Seriously, music and a close up of an alarm clock is all it takes. This revelation came thanks to Supernatural, which for a teenie show about some pretty-boy ghost hunters living the greatest hits of every horror movie you're ever seen, is having a surprisingly good third season. It's going into some surprisingly dark places, the goodies really don't always win and it's pretty original as well. Plus it can be really really funny, too.

Related entries

  • February 29, 2008: Review: Ashes to Ashes 1x4
    My review of the fourth episode of Ashes to Ashes

Read other posts about: , , ,

5 Comments

  1. Toby OB wrote:
    February 16, 2008 | Reply

    Not sure whether you should have cloaked that "Lost" hope reference for your UK readers or not, but I'll hide my response, just in case.....

    Desmond couldn't be part of the Oceanic Six because he wasn't in the original manifest. That's not to say that he won't make it off-island - I'd like to see that happen, so that he could be reunited with Penny, but 'Lost' can be such a downer sometimes - but the Six should be passengers from the flight.

    I don't think Locke is one either. I just can't see him leaving the island. And we have enough of the Six who want to go back already.

    I would have strung out a theory that Kate wasn't one of the Six either, but did get off the Island and had to go underground. However, next week's promos seem to negate that idea.

    So we have two left to be revealed....

  2. Toby OB wrote:
    February 16, 2008 | Reply

    Dang. I screwed it up. Closed it too early.

  3. MediumRob MT replied to Toby OB's comment:
    February 16, 2008 | Reply

    Don't worry, I fixed it. Wasn't your fault - it was an HTML/MT limitation.

    As for spoilers on Lost, Sky currently airs the episode that's on in the US on the following Sunday, so the UK is only three days behind now.

  4. Marie wrote:
    February 16, 2008 | Reply

    I like Alex. Seriously.

  5. MediumRob MT replied to Marie's comment:
    February 16, 2008 | Reply

    Why? And did you like her after the first episode or after the second? I can understand why if it were the latter, but I'd be hard pressed to understand the former...

Leave a comment

Your comment


Comment preview

Subscribe to comments
You can subscribe to comments using one of the methods below:

Comments feed for this entry

Comments feed for the blog

Allowable comments
You can leave just about any kind of comment you like. You can argue, suggest I am (or anyone else is) wrong, leaving general messages of love – anything. However, you absolutely can't leave messages that are general insults or abusive: your comment will either be edited or deleted and you'll be barred from leaving any further comments. We want to keep it civil here.

Spoilers
If you're going to put something you think is a spoiler into one of your comments, put <spoiler> in front of it and </spoiler> after it; if your spoiler is long, remember to put the tags before and after every paragraph. Your spoiler will then only appear if anyone highlights it with their mouse. Remember: your comments also show up in the sidebar at the side of every page!

HTML and user pics
For details of what HTML you can use and how you can get a picture next to your comments, please read the comment guidelines, first.

Featured Articles

Justified 1x1

Like Walker: Texas Ranger but better, thanks to Elmore Leonard and Timothy Olyphant
Credit Counseling - Credit Consolidation - Credit Card Consolidation - Phoenix Landscaping