In the US: Sundays, AMC, 10pm/9c
In the UK: Not yet acquired
Brace yourself. In just five paragraphs' time, I'm going to be using the word Chekovian.
Okay, science geeks. Who here among us has never considered using their terrible knowledge for evil instead of good? Come on, fess up. You know you want to.
Only me, hey? Oh well... Woo ha ha.
Nevertheless, as you can probably tell from films like Revenge of the Nerds and Falling Down, there's a whole lot of rage pent up in the nerdlier parts of the US population. And here's comes a TV show from Vince Gilligan, former producer of The X-Files, about a high school chemistry teacher who decides to get rich by making crystal meth.
At this point, you might be tempted to switch off the show or not even tune in. But I think that would be a mistake.
For one thing, while it's by no means an easy show - in many ways it could be described as Chekovian - it is darkly comic in multiple joyous ways.
But secondly, it's from AMC. This is the channel's second scripted drama series, the first being Mad Men and you know how good that is.*
Plot (copied from your partner's exercise book while he wasn't looking)
Break Bad (v.) 1. to challenge convention 2. to defy authority 3. to raise hell
Chemistry: the study of change. Meet Walter White, a high school chemistry teacher sleepwalking through life when, boom, a terminal diagnosis changes everything. Liberates him. Empowers him to use his chemistry skills anew: to man a rolling drug lab and finance the future for his struggling family. It's an uncontrolled experiment with the American dream. And it finally wakes him up. Breaking Bad: Change the Equation.
Is it any good?
It's clear that AMC has a winning template for its new dramas. Just like Mad Men, everything about Breaking Bad screams quality. It's beautifully shot and directed. It has fantastic performances, particularly from Bryan Cranston. It has moments of dark comedy as well as full on, unfiltered drama and deft little character touches. And it does this without any real ostentation.
Sure there are little knowingly clever touches, like the title sequence that highlights letters in the cast names that correspond to elements in the Periodic Table (and yes, they are all real elements). And if you've seen Falling Down and similar films (even Love Potion No. 9), you'll notice similar themes: the frustration with irritating parts of everyday life; the desire to open up a can of whoop ass on the cool kids; the desire to demonstrate that all that knowledge isn't geeky but is really very valuable; how taking a walk on the wild side can make you feel more of a man. And so on.
But it does deal with things not commonly shown on TV: coping with terminal cancer; how crime can pay; middle Americans trying to live on tiny budgets, sometimes holding down two jobs to do it; having a disabled child. It's clearly not been designed by committee, something in keeping with AMC's 'auteurs only' policy for its new dramas.
It's a little bit too surreal, a bit too "heightened reality" to really resonate or touch the level of Mad Men. But it's still a fascinating bit of work.
Here's a YouTube trailer.
Cast
Bryan Cranston - Walter White
Anna Gunn - Skyler White
Aaron Paul - Jesse Pinkman
Dean Norris - Hank Schrader
Betsy Brandt - Marie Schrader
RJ Mitte - Walter White Jr.
* If you haven't watched Mad Men, get AMC if you're in the US or BBC4 in the UK, because it's top stuff
Related entries
- March 11, 2009: Review: Breaking Bad 2x1
A review of the first episode of the second season of AMC's Breaking Bad - June 30, 2009: Review: Hung 1x1
A review of the first episode of HBO's Hung
January 25, 2008 | Reply
No no no! It's "Bwahahaha!"
Bryan Cranston is a very under-appreciated actor but I'm sure that will all change with this series. I just hope the fact that it's AMC doesn't mean it will go unnoticed come Emmy time....
January 26, 2008 | Reply
I'm new to this world domination lark. I need practice: thanks for the tip!
Mad Men did well at the Emmys, didn't it?
January 26, 2008 | Reply
Not yet. Emmys for which 'Mad Men' can be considered will happen in September. I think you're confusing it with the Pamelas - er, the Golden Globes....
January 27, 2008 | Reply
I thought I was, but I wasn't sure.
Just read Slate's review of this and the next episode. Bloody hell! That's Malcolm in the Middle's dad! I just did not recognise him with those glasses and the moustache. What a chameleon.