In the US: Fridays, 9pm, Fox. Starts February 22 2008
In the UK: Not yet acquired
Ah, the Danes. What a bunch of wrist-slashers hey?
Okay, bit of a dodgy cultural stereotype*, but I'm pretty sure someone in a US casting office somewhere thought to themselves: “Script about a clinically depressed immortal who's yearning to meet the love of his life just so he can die? Get Denmark on the line, now!”
Hence the casting of Nikolaj Coster-Waldau in New Amsterdam, in which a Dutch settler of the region that was to become New Amsterdam and then New York does a good deed, ends up immortal and then mopes around a lot for four centuries.
No news tomorrow since it's my birthday and I'm not working for any amount of money then. But the news will be back on Monday. Incidentally, happy birthday to Kev for today!
In the US: Thursdays, 9/8c, Fox. Starts January
In the UK: Not yet acquired
You may be aware of the phenomenon of “TV a-holes”. There's a lot of them about. We're talking about TV shows, such as House and Shark, that revolve around brilliant but obnoxious professionals. They get the job done better than anyone, but not before they've told you that your mother was a hamster and your father smelled of elderberries.
In all these cases, you'll notice two things
They're still the hero and you still kind of like them
They're all blokes
Now we have what looks like a prima facia case of “you've come a long way baby, but just how far?”. Canterbury's Law stars ex ER star Julianna Margulies as a defence attorney prepared to do whatever it takes to prove her client's innocence, even if that involves breaking the law herself. And she's a complete a-hole. The question is, will we like her as well?
Here's novel. It's the middle of winter and I'm doing a season finale. Even more novel, I'm doing a season finale for Heroes and I've already done one this year for the first season, and that only aired on the BBC last night.
That last point is very useful because I did have visions of a spoiler-free review of this finale for UK viewers that basically went along the lines of “some stuff happened involving some people”. As it is, I've had to use this generic picture from the finale (is she alive? I“m not saying, but remember time travel, etc are all possible in Heroes, so assume nothing, UK viewers) to avoid any real spoilers. Fingers-crossed, I won't be spoiling anyone when I get down to the details.
As we all know, the new series of Torchwood is just around the corner. It starts in January in fact, maybe the 18th. The publicity machine is starting up in earnest and the interviews are being ground out in various media.
Top of the list of questions asked of the stars seems to be “Why do you think fans reacted so badly to the first series?” Now, I'm thinking of compiling the great big list of “Really Stupid Reasons Why People Who Like Torchwood Think People Who Don't Like Torchwood Don't Like It” aka The RSRWPWLTTPWDLTDLI List because I'm seeing loads of theories from people who loved Torchwood (or work on it) that don't at the very least square with my reasons and at the very worst seem to be utterly divorced from reality.
Torchwood seems to be the Marmite of television shows: you either love it or you hate it. However, my reasons for generally not liking Torchwood, bar the first episode, the PJ Hammond episode and a few towards the end, were:
It was illogical, implausible and made no sense most of the time
It wasn't big or clever but thought it was
It was completely inconsistent even on its own terms, with people swearing like troopers in one episode and not swearing at all the next. See also point 4
It had appalling characterisation, with a date rapist turning all sensitive the next episode before reverting back to form and Ianto trying to kill Jack for killing his girlfriend in one episode then having a timed wank off with him within the next couple of episodes
The characters were mostly quite dull
Some of the plots were a bit threadbare
It seems to be written at times by people who have never spoken to other human beings
It's supposed to be for adults, but it seems aimed at teenagers who have heard about this sex thing but haven't yet “done it”
I can enjoy a silly show, a fantasy show and all sorts of other shows. I just don't really enjoy appallingly badly written ones.
But already on The RSRWPWLTTPWDLTDLI List, we have some of the following reasons why most people don't like Torchwood
They're alienated by the overt sexuality in the show (shag who you like, as often as you like - just shag them convincingly, I say. That's not over sexuality I see, though, that's just dialogue points on a demographics board)
It's because it's not Doctor Who (in common with over 99% of other TV shows, quite a lot of which are better than Torchwood)
The only people who don't like Torchwood are closed-minded and homophobic (see the first item on the list)
They're jealous of the Range Rover (it's killing the planet)
As I said, I'm building a list, so if you've seen any really unconvincing arguments about why people might not like Torchwood, leave them below.
Equally, let us know why you love Torchwood, if you do. Fancying Ianto, Jack or whomever is a valid reason, although you're putting yourself through a lot of pain for the sake of love, my friend. If you talk about its excellent writing quality, however, I know two doctors licensed under section five of the Mental Health Act 1983 who'll want to have a word.
Read more on What have you been watching this week? (w/e 3 July)