Categorised | British TV

Tags | None

Review: Doctor Who 3x14 - Time Crash

Posted on November 19, 2007 | 9 comments |

Time Crash

So what are you all thinking about Time Crash, the sort-of, maybe official fifth and tenth Doctor meet-up on Children in Need? It was a bit short to warrant a full review and it would be a tad odd to do a full review anyway, but I liked it – with a couple of reservations.

On the one hand, it was rather a touching love letter from Steven Moffat (and David Tennant) to the Peter Davison era of Doctor Who. It was also rather lovely to get probably the only Doctors meet-up we'll ever get from the RTD era of new Who.

On the other, it was a tad Blinkish in its “the future creates the past” plot and it was perhaps a little too super-textual, with all that love implausibly coming out of the Doctor's mouth directly from Moffat.

All the same, good fun, very likeable and I'll probably re-watch it a couple of times in the immediate future. Plus it was for charity so let's not quibble too much.

What did everyone else think though? I know Anna liked it, but everyone else has been silent (post links to your blog below if you haven't been silent and I've lazily/blindly missed your comments elsewhere).

Incidentally, my wife, on the strength of this and implausibly enough Learners (which SHE WATCHED WITHOUT ME), has decided she's falling in love with David Tennant and would quite like him to move in with us. Him and Peter Jones from Dragons' Den.

I've put my foot down and said no.

In case you missed it, here it is on YouTube.

Related entries

  • May 19, 2008: Review: Doctor Who 4x7 - The Unicorn and the Wasp
    My review of the Doctor Who episode 'The Unicorn and the Wasp'

9 Comments

  1. Toby OB wrote:
    November 19, 2007 | Reply

    http://toobworld.blogspot.com/2007/11/five-ten-will-get-you-plenty.html

    So I bought into it completely. I liked especially the explanation as to why previous incarnations of the Doctor always look older when meeting up with the present version. There's hope yet then for Tom to come back! (Still would hope he had to wear a shaggy wig though, rather than that look he sported in Dimensions In Time.)

    At least Tennant as Ten qualified his statement as to why Five was his Doctor, because he emulated many of his precedent's traits. But otherwise I wasn't keen on that little goodbye line.

    Still not sure if all of that technobabble actually made sense or not. I guess I'd actually have to read it. But maybe the AMPTP should kidnap Moffatt and bring him to America to write Trek technobabble. (Hell, we've got all of your actors already anyway!)

    Now if only I could find the 'Hotel Babylon'/Sybil Fawlty bit online......

  2. Marie wrote:
    November 19, 2007 | Reply

    OK, I have posted!

  3. MediumRob MT replied to Marie's comment:
    November 19, 2007 | Reply

    There now. Doesn't that feel better?

  4. Marie wrote:
    November 19, 2007 | Reply

    I know. It was unnatural.

  5. AnnaWaits wrote:
    November 19, 2007 | Reply

    Yeah, I did kind of adore it... *but* I have to agree that the 'You were my Doctor' line seemed totally odd. I just thought 'no you weren't. Tom Baker was. You were *Moffat's* Doctor, maybe....' But I didn't care. The fact is that no current Doctor Who writer except Moffat and RTD could write a sketch set entirely in the TARDIS with no time for any sort of plot and make it THAT entertaining.

    (Moffat does need to stop referencing his own episodes - and pretty much *solely* his own episodes - though....)

  6. Rullsenberg wrote:
    November 19, 2007 | Reply

    Your wife: smart woman* (we'll forgive her the Dragon's Den love) and send her a welcome-to-our-DT-loving-gang hug from Me, Anna, Marie... etc etc


    *After all, she married you! (Decides flattery of bloghost never hurts...)

  7. Mark H Wilkinson wrote:
    November 19, 2007 | Reply

    'Twas a pleasantly amusing few minutes. Can't really ask for more than that, can you, (even if Moffat laid on the hero worship a bit thick)?

  8. Stuart wrote:
    November 19, 2007 | Reply

    http://iriswildthyme.blogspot.com/2007/11/timey-wimey-crashy-stuff.html

    Although my blog post on Time Crash is almost shorter than the URL...well there's not a great deal beyond 'that was good' (or not) you can say about 7 minutes of telly, is there?

Leave a comment

Your comment


Comment preview

Subscribe to comments
You can subscribe to comments using one of the methods below:

Comments feed for this entry

Comments feed for the blog

Allowable comments
You can leave just about any kind of comment you like. You can argue, suggest I am (or anyone else is) wrong, leaving general messages of love – anything. However, you absolutely can't leave messages that are general insults or abusive: your comment will either be edited or deleted and you'll be barred from leaving any further comments. We want to keep it civil here.

Spoilers
If you're going to put something you think is a spoiler into one of your comments, put <spoiler> in front of it and </spoiler> after it; if your spoiler is long, remember to put the tags before and after every paragraph. Your spoiler will then only appear if anyone highlights it with their mouse. Remember: your comments also show up in the sidebar at the side of every page!

HTML and user pics
For details of what HTML you can use and how you can get a picture next to your comments, please read the comment guidelines, first.

Featured Articles

Justified 1x1

Like Walker: Texas Ranger but better, thanks to Elmore Leonard and Timothy Olyphant
Arizona Landscaping - Internet Marketing - Debt Consolidation - Renegade Motorhomes