Categorised | Featured articles

Questions and realisations from television last week: Everything

Posted on October 8, 2007 | 7 comments |

Street Hawk

Question: Why were most episodes of all the new and returning US shows better in their second week this year?

It's quite a list of shows this season that had better episodes than their premieres: House, Heroes, The Unit, Big Bang Theory, Bionic Woman, and Moonlight. A few were about as good (Numb3rs, Journeyman) and there was one that was worse (Chuck).

But on the whole, the second episodes were better than the first. Which is odd, because as Ken Levine points out (thanks Toby!), normally the second episode of a series is rubbish or at least pretty bad compared with the first. So why is it that the second episodes have been so good this time round?

Realisation: Second episodes are the new first episodes, thanks to the demise of the “feature-length opening episode”. No spoilers for any current shows, I promise.

Back in the day, every show started with a feature-length episode or movie. All those lovely action series of the 80s ?¢‚Ǩ‚Äú Airwolf, Street Hawk, Knight Rider, Manimal ?¢‚Ǩ‚Äú all had memorable feature-length episodes and that's just to name a few. Even regular-type shows like LA Law began with feature-length pilot episodes. The idea was that even if the show didn't manage to become a series, it could be sold or re-used as a TV movie.

Then along came the mighty power of syndication, with its demands for every episode to be the same length and soon these feature-length pilots started to be written so that they could easily be chopped in two. Star Trek: The Next Generation, of course, started off in syndication, free of network interference, so had an easily snippable double-length episode movie that had extra footage for episode two in which Riker gets to look over the Enterprise archives to see what happened in episode one. CSI began with a double-length episode and Five US didn't even realise it was a two-parter so only showed the second episode when it launched.

In fact, proper feature-length launches are now so rare that the announcement last week that NBC's planned revival of Knight Rider was going to start with a TV movie caused Variety to raise its (virtual) eyebrows in surprise.

The plan these days seems to be to wow them with cash, stars and concepts in episode one

Even though the double-length episode/TV movie has virtually disappeared from the schedules, with only minor networks able to find the time in the schedules for such special events (cf The USA Network and Burn Notice), that doesn't mean the needs of series have changed any. Yes, pace has sped up over the years, but a pilot still needs to introduce characters, situation, et al and give viewers the time to find things they can like about the show ?¢‚Ǩ‚Äú like enough to keep watching it.

With the increasing number of ad breaks in US TV reducing total programme time to 40 minutes or less and shows needing to make much more of an impact in a multi-channel world, that means most of the otherwise 'dull' stuff is having to be shunted off into the second episode rather than being dispersed throughout the length of an entire TV movie. The plan these days seems to be to wow them with cash, stars and concepts in episode one, then give the viewers the frippery, characterisation, character development and natural evolution of relationships that will keep the viewers coming (assuming they make it as far as episode two). The second episode is, in effect, the proper first episode since it's the one that's re-establish the boundaries and style of the show.

Every season opener is a mad grab for audiences, both new and old

This is true not just for new shows, but also for returning shows. Every season opener is a mad grab for audiences, both new and old. It needs to introduce or re-introduce the show, establish the format again - or demonstrate what the changes are going to be this time. Sometimes that's too much for it and it needs to spread out into the second episode as well. Either way, if the audience is tuning in for episode two, there's a certain gamble they'll be more patient than others and they'll be prepared to put up with less pyrotechnics and more, erm, quality.

But why is it so true this year? Well, I reckon it's simply the ultimate logical conclusion of this trend. With so much competition from other networks, cable, the Internet, et al, producers are now front-loading their shows just about as much as it's possible to do without totally destroying the plot of the first episode - you can see many of the shows heaving under the strain of the various weights placed on them. That means about as much first-episode quality as possible is being shunted into the second episode, making the second episode the new first episode.

This does, of course, mean that The Carusometer is even more important than it used to be - if you could ever have described it as indispensable, that is. The third episode of any show is now little more than the second episode of an old show, so that extra bit of patience is now needed more than ever to find the shows that need time to establish themselves. If you want to be sure what shows to watch, value The Carusometer.

Related entries

Read other posts about: ,

7 Comments

  1. espedair wrote:
    October 8, 2007 | Reply

    Ok I don't want to show my age or anything but I remember discussing at school the likelihood that you couldn't get away from the laser on the STREETHAWK. I mean it took AGES to open... I'm sure they would have whooped him before it did.

    Can I find a Youtube clip for it hum....

    ok go to about 2.09

    http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=vfn-G1TW4xk

    Actually that's much faster than I remember!
    Ah misspent youth.

  2. Toby OB wrote:
    October 8, 2007 | Reply

    Although I enjoyed it - I'm easy to please! - I know a lot of people were disappointed in the second episode of 'Chuck'. One of my friends in fact refuses to ever watch it again. I'm hearing though that the third episode is supposed to be really quite good. I guess I'll find out once I get home in the morning....

  3. Stu wrote:
    October 9, 2007 | Reply

    Perhaps one of the reasons that second episodes are almost always inferior is because there's suddenly a drop in budget. Pilots and opening episodes always have money thrown at them because as well as being a standard episode the budget also includes construction of the permanent sets, initial cast stipends, hiring a safe pair of hands -- who are then replaced in the following ep by a cheaper rookie. ST:TNG is a classic example -- the reason that I think Picard walks through engineering in Encounter at Farpoint is so that the could actually have a reason and therefore a budget to build an engineering set early on.

    Then again, The Naked Now is hardly a prime example of the 2nd ep rule since E.A.F. was pretty patchy and it took ages before a decent ST:TNG ep turned up. I think it was The Long Goodbye but some disagree.

  4. Cindylover1969 wrote:
    October 9, 2007 | Reply

    the double-length episode/TV movie has virtually disappeared from the schedules, with only minor networks able to find the time in the schedules for such special events (cf The USA Network and Burn Notice),

    And Monk. Let's not forget the pilot for Lost (probably the most recent example on a broadcast network).

  5. MediumRob MT wrote:
    October 10, 2007 | Reply

    All good points. Except for yours, Mr Espedair. Street Hawk could have used his rubber bullet if necessary.

  6. espedair wrote:
    October 12, 2007 | Reply

    True true Mr B but how many bullets rubber or otherwise could you fit in that bike.. I mean it doesn't even have panniers!
    I still think one gang of hoods could just flatten him. IMHO.

  7. MediumRob MT replied to espedair's comment:
    October 13, 2007 | Reply

    You're probably right. If young George Clooney could take out Street Hawk, anyone could.

    It's no coincidence that when Viper, the obvious product-placement Knight Rider rip-off had its Street Hawk rip-off episode, they gave it a force-field that repelled bullets.

Leave a comment

Your comment


Comment preview

Subscribe to comments
You can subscribe to comments using one of the methods below:

Comments feed for this entry

Comments feed for the blog

Allowable comments
You can leave just about any kind of comment you like. You can argue, suggest I am (or anyone else is) wrong, leaving general messages of love – anything. However, you absolutely can't leave messages that are general insults or abusive: your comment will either be edited or deleted and you'll be barred from leaving any further comments. We want to keep it civil here.

Spoilers
If you're going to put something you think is a spoiler into one of your comments, put <spoiler> in front of it and </spoiler> after it; if your spoiler is long, remember to put the tags before and after every paragraph. Your spoiler will then only appear if anyone highlights it with their mouse. Remember: your comments also show up in the sidebar at the side of every page!

HTML and user pics
For details of what HTML you can use and how you can get a picture next to your comments, please read the comment guidelines, first.

Featured Articles

Justified 1x1

Like Walker: Texas Ranger but better, thanks to Elmore Leonard and Timothy Olyphant
Credit Counseling - Renegade Motorhomes - Debt Consolidation - Phoenix Landscaping