Categorised | TV reviews

Tags | None

Review: John from Cincinnati 1.1

Posted on June 15, 2007 | Post a comment | Bookmark and Share

John from Cincinnati

In the US: HBO, Sundays, 9pm ET
In the UK: Not yet acquired.

Repeat after me: “I'm sorry. Did I miss something?”

Go on.

I'm sorry. Did I miss something?

Easy huh?

That's lucky, because you'll need to use this phrase a lot if you choose to watch John from Cincinnati, the new show from Deadwood creator David Milch. It could well be the most brilliant hour of television yet devised. Or it could be the most awful. I'm really not sure.

Ostensibly, it's a show set against the community of Imperial Beach, California, based on the “surf noir” books of Kem Nunn. But that's like saying that Deadwood is about the Wild West or The Wire is about cops.

We have Bruce Greenwood as a pro surfer now past his prime thanks to a knee injury. He has a rubbish marriage with his wife (I think. I'm sorry, I might have missed something), Rebecca de Mornay. His son wants to follow in his footsteps as a surfer and Luke Perry wants to be the kid's manager; his other son (I think. I'm sorry, I might have missed something) is too busy dealing drugs (I think. I'm sorry, I might have missed something).

This is where the weirdness begins. Greenwood thinks he has a brain tumour because he imagines he can float. Except other people can see him floating.

Then there's the guy who's just bought Greenwood's old hotel (I think. I'm sorry, I might have missed something). He won his money on the lottery, but has a feud with Greenwood's druggie son, because he accidentally beat him with a broomstick and gave him epilepsy. Never mind: teddy will keep him company.

Then there's Ed O'Neill, Greenwood's retired cop father. He's just mental.

Then there's John. He might be from Cincinnati, but unless I missed something, we don't know that for sure. All we know is that he's very mysterious and repeats everything you say to him very enthusiastically. He might even be Jesus.

I'm really just not sure if it's brilliant or stupid. It's like watching some distilled essence of one of Hal Hartley's slightly pacier movies. I'm not entirely sure it's my cup of tea, but it has a great theme and some great surfing moments and is probably going to grow on me. I suspect we have the beginnings of a cult on our hands though.

Here's a stonking great big ten minute “Making of” YouTube video that hopefully explains everything. I doubt it though (I'm sorry, I might have missed something).

Related entries

  • June 26, 2007: Third-episode verdict: John from Cincinnati
    My third-episode verdict on John from Cincinnati
  • May 7, 2011: Review: The Shadow Line 1x1
    A review of the first episode of BBC2's The Shadow Line
  • May 10, 2013: Your handy guide to true religions on TV
    Your handy guide to true religions on TV
  • May 13, 2013: Your handy guide to true religions on TV - Judaeo-Christianity
    All the scripted shows on Western, English-language TV that have not just featured Judaeo-Christianity but have actually shown it to be true in some way or other
  • May 25, 2016: Preview: Preacher 1x1-1x3 (US: AMC; UK: Amazon Prime)
    A review of the first three episodes of AMC/Amazon Prime's Preacher
  • October 30, 2016: Review: Chance 1x1-1x3 (US: Hulu)
    A review of the first three episodes of Hulu's Chance

Allowable comments

You can leave just about any kind of comment you like. You can argue, suggest I am (or anyone else is) wrong, leaving general messages of love – anything. However, you absolutely can't leave messages that attack other commenters (or me), are simple variations of "your review sucks" or that are misogynistic, racist, homophobic, etc: your comment will either be edited or deleted and you'll be barred from leaving any further comments. We want to keep it civil here.

Spoilers

You can hide a spoiler by putting <spoiler> before it and </spoiler> after it. Hover over a spoiler to reveal it!

Featured Articles

Famous In Love

A slap in the face to aspiring actresses