So I finally made my way through The Shakespeare Code after missing it on Saturday and then finding my PVR hadn't bothered to record it (that's Bastard the PVR for you).
Not bad, was it? Definitely in the upper echelons of new Who. But I'm struggling to find things to say about it other than the usual. You see it all felt a bit mechanical. I don't why. I liked it. It wasn't full of cringe-inducing awfulness. There were some very nice touches to it, and some good characterisation and dialogue for everyone involved. Some of the make-up was a bit rubbish and Freema had a few duff moments, I suppose, but that's the upper limit of my severe criticisms of the piece. Not very severe, were they?
But there was nothing to lift it to the level of Girl in the Fireplace or The Impossible Planet. It was just good, not excellent. But for the life of me, I can't work out what was wrong with it. Was it the hint of “Will be used in schools in future as course material” quality to it? Was it the way the baddies were stopped with just a not very good, Charmed-esque rhyme? Was it the ever so slightly wrong-looking Elizabethan backdrops? I don't know.
How very very strange. Anyone got more of a clue than me?
Hmm, did I just open myself up to something there?
- May 19, 2008: Review: Doctor Who 4x7 - The Unicorn and the Wasp
My review of the Doctor Who episode 'The Unicorn and the Wasp'
- July 30, 2008: Third-series nu-Who re-evaluation
We're re-evaluating the third series of nu-Who
- November 3, 2008: Review: The Sarah Jane Adventures 2x6
A review of the sixth episode of the second series of The Sarah Jane Adventures
- January 7, 2010: The writers for series five of Doctor Who
The writers of series five of Doctor Who
- June 7, 2010: Review: Doctor Who 5x10 - Vincent and the Doctor
A review of the Doctor Who story Vincent and the Doctor, starring Matt Smith and Karen Gillan