Categorised | Reviews

Tags | None

Third-episode verdict: The Sarah Silverman Program

Posted on February 19, 2007 | Post a comment | Bookmark and Share

The Carusometer for The Sarah Silverman ProgramPartial Caruso

Bottoms. Ha, ha!

Flaps. Hee, hee!

Repeat for 20 minutes and you've pretty much got The Sarah Silverman Program. That's maybe a little unfair — but only a little.

The show's one of those programmes you want to like. The idea of a successful and talented comedienne not getting a cookie cutter sitcom in which she's just the regular girl next day looking for love (cf Jenny McCarthy and Jenny, et al) is one that I applaud.

Instead, Silverman's put together something that's a third It's Garry Shandling's Show, a third Beavis and Butthead and a third concentrated Ricky Gervais. At times, it's pretty funny.

But most of the time it's something that, if I were 18, I would love but since I'm getting on for twice that age now, I can't help but think is a little childish.

So for being uniformly not awful, not boring but still not that great, The Medium is Not Enough declares The Sarah Silverman Program to be a two or 'Partial Caruso' on The Carusometer quality scale. A Partial Caruso corresponds to a show with two walk-on cameos by David Caruso. Despite not being given one-liners by the script writer, he will attempt to ad lib his own. Fortunately, network censors delete them on quality and taste grounds, leaving behind just a vague rictus grin by Caruso before each commercial break.

Allowable comments

You can leave just about any kind of comment you like. You can argue, suggest I am (or anyone else is) wrong, leaving general messages of love – anything. However, you absolutely can't leave messages that attack other commenters (or me), are simple variations of "your review sucks" or that are misogynistic, racist, homophobic, etc: your comment will either be edited or deleted and you'll be barred from leaving any further comments. We want to keep it civil here.


You can hide a spoiler by putting <spoiler> before it and </spoiler> after it. Hover over a spoiler to reveal it!

Featured Articles

Twin Peaks

Lynch at his best in years