Categorised | Fall 2006

Tags | None

Review: Criminal Minds 2.1

Posted on September 21, 2006 | Post a comment |

Criminal Minds

In the US: Wednesdays, 9pm ET/PT, CBS
In the UK: Season one currently on Five. Will probably air on Living in 2007.

Characters re-cast: 0
Major characters gotten rid of: 0 (1 soon)
Major new characters: 0
Format change percentage: 0%
Cast members looking seriously older: 1

Criminal Minds was one of those shows I rejected as stupid over a year ago when I saw the screener. I've caught an episode here and there since, and while it's not that bad, it combines massive over-seriousness with completely preposterous storylines.

The thing is, most serial killers, psychopaths and sociopaths are really dull. They're not like the serial killers in books and movies. So when you make a TV series about them, you either have to come up with some completely unrealistic serial killers or produce a dull show.

So I tuned into the premiere episode of the second season, which picks up from last season's finale, The Fisher King (Part One). My, they've gone for “interesting” killers in a big way, haven't they?

Clearly, since this is a two-parter, I won't spoil things for UK viewers by revealing what's going on. I will say you don't have to be too nervous about anyone dying off (although there are a couple of close calls) and the Fisher King is eventually tracked down. The motivation is typically silly, but masked with so much psychological jargon, you could almost believe it true.

The characters are the same, the set-up's the same. Mandy Patinkin is criminally under-used, however, in favour of nerdy bloke, which is clearly a mistake since Patinkin is absolutely the only reason to watch the show. Although the ratings say otherwise, I think they're mistaken in retreading the path used by NBC's Profiler during the 90s. And if you can't get me to watch a crime show featuring psychologists, you know you're doing something wrong.

New viewers: stay away
Old viewers: you'll probably love it, but it's still not very good.

Related entries

  • October 13, 2006: US TV news from Mr Ausiello
    Criminal Minds is now beating Lost in the ratings.
  • September 28, 2007: Five brief reviews for things that don't deserve an entire entry to themselves
    Reviews of Criminal Minds 3.1, Flight of the Conchords 1.1, Shark 2.1, Bionic Woman 1.1 and Highlander: The Source
  • March 13, 2009: Review: Castle 1x1
    A review of the first episode of ABC's Castle, starring Nathan Fillion and Stana Katic

No Comments

Leave a comment

Your comment


Comment preview

Subscribe to comments
You can subscribe to comments using one of the methods below:

Comments feed for this entry

Comments feed for the blog

Allowable comments
You can leave just about any kind of comment you like. You can argue, suggest I am (or anyone else is) wrong, leaving general messages of love – anything. However, you absolutely can't leave messages that are general insults or abusive: your comment will either be edited or deleted and you'll be barred from leaving any further comments. We want to keep it civil here.

Spoilers
If you're going to put something you think is a spoiler into one of your comments, put <spoiler> in front of it and </spoiler> after it; if your spoiler is long, remember to put the tags before and after every paragraph. Your spoiler will then only appear if anyone highlights it with their mouse. Remember: your comments also show up in the sidebar at the side of every page!

HTML and user pics
For details of what HTML you can use and how you can get a picture next to your comments, please read the comment guidelines, first.

Featured Articles

Justified 1x1

Like Walker: Texas Ranger but better, thanks to Elmore Leonard and Timothy Olyphant
Credit Counseling - Arizona Landscaping - Debt Consolidation - Renegade Motorhomes