Categorised | TV reviews

Review: Brotherhood

Posted on July 13, 2006 | Post a comment | Bookmark and Share

Jason Isaacs in Brotherhood
In the US: Sunday, 10 pm ET/PT, Showtime
In the UK: Not acquired yet

Jason Isaacs likes to do hard. His first big UK role was in Civvies, Lynda La Plante's everyday story of former paratroopers trying to get jobs that don't involve breaking and entering. He's over in the US now in Brotherhood, a Showtime drama about two brothers, one on the right side of the law, the other on the wrong side.

Guess which side Jason's on.

At first glance, Brotherhood isn't particularly inspiring. Isaacs is a serious crim who's been missing for seven years. Australian actor Jason Clarke plays his brother, who's now a respectable politician. Brotherhood ostensibly looks at how you can have a family member you want to love but who will ruin everything you've done if you allow them to get close to you.

But there is a slight twist to this. Clarke isn't actually very respectable. His vote is buyable, he's in league with all sorts of bad elements, including corrupt unions (oh what a surprise. A US drama series where a union is corrupt). He only wants Isaacs out of his life so that people don't realise he's actually about as criminal as they come, too. The show's most interesting moments deal with the corruption of the political process.

Isaacs' character isn't as evil as everyone thinks though. Although a 'three-in-one' hit man (judge, jury and executioner), not adverse to extreme amounts of brutality and mutilation, he's all doing it with the best intents: he takes action against a man who threatens to rape a woman by cutting of the man's ear and sending it to her as a gift along with some new earrings (it's supposed to reassure her); instead of killing people, he pays them to disappear so he won't have to.

And the 'brotherhood' of the title doesn't just mean the two Jasons' brotherhood; it also means the brotherhood between criminals in the same gang.

At the moment though, Brotherhood is pretty unappetising. There's none of the great writing of The Sopranos. There's no character - major or minor - who isn't criminal or unpleasant in one way or another, right down to Clarke's nine-year-old daughter.

It's heavy going and not especially enjoyable. The strength of Isaacs' and Clarke's performances make it an interesting character piece, but there's going to need to be more plot and development to make it more than just a tale of two brothers - something we've seen many times before.

Related entries

  • July 26, 2006: Third-episode verdict: Brotherhood
    Brotherhood (which I now belatedly realise is probably a bad play on words: brotherhood, brother hood. It's about gangsters. Get it?) has improved a bit since its first episode, which was a bit of mish-mash. The trouble is it's...
  • September 18, 2006: Other TV news from last week
    Brotherhood's been picked up by FX in the UK.
  • May 18, 2010: Clips and details of Fox's new shows for Fall 2010
    What new shows do Fox have for Fall 2010? Details and videos.
  • October 21, 2010: Series finale: Rubicon
    A review of the whole first season of Rubicon
  • February 20, 2012: Preview: Awake (NBC) 1x1
    A preview of the first episode of NBC's Awake, starring Jason Isaacs

Read other posts about:

Allowable comments

You can leave just about any kind of comment you like. You can argue, suggest I am (or anyone else is) wrong, leaving general messages of love – anything. However, you absolutely can't leave messages that attack other commenters (or me), are simple variations of "your review sucks" or that are misogynistic, racist, homophobic, etc: your comment will either be edited or deleted and you'll be barred from leaving any further comments. We want to keep it civil here.


You can hide a spoiler by putting <spoiler> before it and </spoiler> after it. Hover over a spoiler to reveal it!

Featured Articles

Twin Peaks

Lynch at his best in years